Lebanese bank hostage situation ends after partial payout

1 / 2
Members of the Lebanese army secure the area near Federal bank in Hamra, Lebanon. (AN PHOTO/FIRAS HAIDAR)
2 / 2
Crowds gathered outside the Federal Bank of Lebanon as the siege continued. (AN PHOTO/FIRAS HAIDAR)
Short Url
Updated 12 August 2022
Follow

Lebanese bank hostage situation ends after partial payout

  • Civilians gather outside bank in support of gunman
  • Bank's lawyer claims efforts under way to reach a negotiated conclusion

Bystanders praised an armed man who held bank staff hostage for hours on Thursday in Beirut because he could not access funds frozen at the bank after the country’s economic collapse.

The hostage situation in a bank in Lebanon’s capital ended after authorities agreed to grant the gunman partial access to his frozen funds in exchange for releasing all the hostages.

The man — 42-year-old Bassam Al-Sheikh Hussein — surrendered to security forces when the bank agreed to give him $30,000 out of his more than $200,000 in trapped savings.

Al-Sheikh Hussein earlier took more than eight employees hostage at Federal Bank in Hamra, Beirut.

He poured gasoline on the floor and pointed a shotgun at employees, demanding the bank let him withdraw $2,000 from his frozen accounts, in accordance with the central bank circulars to all banks in 2019.

Soldiers and officers from the Internal Security Forces surrounded the bank, which is situated on one of the busiest streets leading to the American University of Beirut and its medical center.

Negotiations began between the gunman and the bank’s management, first led by Hassan Mughnieh, the head of Lebanon’s Depositors Association.

They were later joined by the ISF’s information branch in the negotiations.

Caretaker Minister of Interior Bassam Mawlawi’s media office announced that he was following up the negotiations between the information branch and the Federal Bank from the ISF’s operations rooms.

Footage of Al-Sheikh Hussein first appeared on social media platforms, with the gunman shouting demands for his money to be released.

He told bank employees he wanted money to pay for medical bills for his father, who was receiving treatment in a hospital.

One of the bank employees filmed the scene, when the gunman could be seen carrying a gun.

The man entered the bank around 11 a.m. and asked the bank’s customers to leave while keeping the employees and the bank’s branch manager Hassan Halawi inside the building.

Two customers remained inside by accident, while one employee managed to evade capture as he was on duty outside the bank. The employee told Arab News that he was surprised to see the army and ISF surrounding the bank upon his return.

One of the customers taken hostage was released by the gunman, and handed to the Red Cross who were waiting for him, while the other insisted on staying inside “in solidarity with the armed man.”

Hasan Moghnieh, head of the depositors association, who led the negotiations with the armed depositor, told Arab News that he was negotiating with him from behind the metal bars of the bank’s closed gate.

Moghnieh said the armed man seemed calm and was assured by the security agencies that he would not be harmed.

“He is sitting in a chair, and I do not know how he dares to smoke a cigarette near the gasoline,” he added.

Moghnieh added that the gunman initially demanded to withdraw $2,000 to pay for his father’s medical bills at the Al-Zahraa hospitall, but when this was initially refused he demanded the entire $210,000 balance of his account.

On further conversation with the bank's manager, Moghnieh said the gunman was offered $10,000. However, the armed depositor rejected the offer, demanding his entire balance.

“I do not know the armed man in person. However, while negotiating with him, his threats seemed serious as he told me that he will throw the bank manager out of the window. He did not harm the detainees,” Moghnieh added.

Curious onlookers first gathered near the bank, then were joined by the concerned families of the bank employees.

They were later joined by Al-Sheikh Hussein’s family in Beirut, who began negotiating a settlement for him.

Moghnieh said: “The family wants a written undertaking that the ISF would not assault their son, and that they are ready to lower the demand and deduct a decent amount from the deposit.”

He said the bank first suggested $10,000, and when the armed man insisted on withdrawing his entire deposit, there was no more contact between the bank manager and the central management.

Other people, including customers of the bank chanting their support for the armed man: “Down with the rule of the banks,” one of the slogans of 2019’s mass protests.

Activist lawyer Haytham Azzo told Arab News: “We are following up on the events and we had warned that this would be one of the unjust banking procedures’ implications. As lawyers, we are ready to defend Al-Sheikh Hassan for free.”

Azzo said the banks had compromised national security, which was proven by “what we are seeing today.”

He added: “We called for people to be able to withdraw deposits when necessary, and the banks refused.”

The head of the Federation of Syndicates of Banks Employees in Lebanon, George Al-Hajj, earlier said they wanted the incident to end peacefully.

“We will not resort to a strike because it would be useless.”

A statement from the Depositors Association held the bank owners, government, parliament and the central bank responsible for Thursday’s developments.

The association said  “the extortion of depositors and theft of their life savings will lead to further unpredictable responses.”

The association held the judicial authorities responsible for any violence on the streets or in the face of banks, due to its determination to protect the “unjust and aggressor against the oppressed depositor.”

The tense situation in Beirut occurred after Lebanese banks resumed work on Wednesday, following a strike last Monday, in protest against the judiciary’s treatment of banks, in light of the depositors’ proceedings against them.

In a general assembly on Wednesday, the Association of Banks in Lebanon called upon the establishment of a banking court, similar to the financial markets tribunal.

The association also demanded the acceleration of adopting legislation related to a recovery plan, noting demands from the International Monetary Fund.


Syrian military tells civilians to evacuate contested area east of Aleppo amid rising tensions

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Syrian military tells civilians to evacuate contested area east of Aleppo amid rising tensions

  • Syria’s military has announced it will open a “humanitarian corridor” for civilians to evacuate from an area in Aleppo province
  • This follows several days of intense clashes between government forces and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces
DAMASCUS: Syria’s military said it would open a corridor Thursday for civilians to evacuate an area of Aleppo province that has seen a military buildup following intense clashes between government and Kurdish-led forces in Aleppo city.
The army’s announcement late Wednesday — which said civilians would be able to evacuate through the “humanitarian corridor” from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Thursday — appeared to signal plans for an offensive in the towns of Deir Hafer and Maskana and surrounding areas, about 60 kilometers (40 miles) east of Aleppo city.
The military called on the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces and other armed groups to withdraw to the other side of the the Euphrates River, to the east of the contested zone.
Syrian government troops have already sent troop reinforcements to the area after accusing the SDF of building up its own forces there, which the SDF denied. There have been limited exchanges of fire between the two sides, and the SDF has said that Turkish drones carried out strikes there.
The government has accused the SDF of launching drone strikes in Aleppo city, including one that hit the Aleppo governorate building on Saturday shortly after two Cabinet ministers and a local official held a news conference there.
The tensions in the Deir Hafer area come after several days of intense clashes last week in Aleppo city that ended with the evacuation of Kurdish fighters and government forces taking control of three contested neighborhoods. The fighting killed at least 23 people, wounded dozens more, and displaced tens of thousands.
The fighting broke out as negotiations have stalled between Damascus and the SDF, which controls large swaths of northeast Syria, over an agreement to integrate their forces and for the central government to take control of institutions including border crossings and oil fields in the northeast.
Some of the factions that make up the new Syrian army, which was formed after the fall of former President Bashar Assad in a rebel offensive in December 2024, were previously Turkiye-backed insurgent groups that have a long history of clashing with Kurdish forces.
The SDF for years has been the main US partner in Syria in fighting against the Daesh group, but Turkiye considers the SDF a terrorist organization because of its association with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK, which has waged a long-running insurgency in Turkiye. A peace process is now underway.
Despite the long-running US support for the SDF, the Trump administration has also developed close ties with the government of interim Syrian President Ahmad Al-Sharaa and has pushed the Kurds to implement the integration deal. Washington has so far avoided publicly taking sides in the clashes in Aleppo.
The SDF in a statement warned of “dangerous repercussions on civilians, infrastructure, and vital facilities” in case of a further escalation and said Damascus bears “full responsibility for this escalation and all ensuing humanitarian and security repercussions in the region.”
Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of US Central Command, said in a statement Tuesday that the US is “closely monitoring” the situation and called for “all parties to exercise maximum restraint, avoid actions that could further escalate tensions, and prioritize the protection of civilians and critical infrastructure.” He called on the parties to “return to the negotiating table in good faith.”
Al-Sharaa blasts the SDF
In a televised interview aired Wednesday, Al-Sharaa praised the “courage of the Kurds” and said he would guarantee their rights and wants them to be part of the Syrian army, but he lashed out at the SDF.
He accused the group of not abiding by an agreement reached last year under which their forces were supposed to withdraw from neighborhoods they controlled in Aleppo city and of forcibly preventing civilians from leaving when the army opened a corridor for them to evacuate amid the recent clashes.
Al-Sharaa claimed that the SDF refused attempts by France and the US to mediate a ceasefire and withdrawal of Kurdish forces during the clashes due to an order from the PKK.
The interview was initially intended to air Tuesday on Shams TV, a broadcaster based in Irbil — the seat of northern Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdish region — but was canceled for what the station initially said were technical reasons.
Later the station’s manager said that the interview had been spiked out of fear of further inflaming tensions because of the hard line Al-Sharaa took against the SDF.
Syria’s state TV station instead aired clips from the interview on Wednesday. There was no immediate response from the SDF to Al-Sharaa’s comments.