Pakistan teams up with PETA to stop tests and surgeries on live animals

Vets examine the body of a dead female leopard killed by villagers after it reportedly attacked the village people living in Jhelum Valley, Muzaffarabad on February 8, 2022. (AFP/FILE)
Short Url
Updated 23 July 2022
Follow

Pakistan teams up with PETA to stop tests and surgeries on live animals

  • Reforms include replacing animals in medical training, dissection exercises, and biomedical research with superior methods 
  • Move comes after outrage in Pakistan over videos showing animals in states of distress after allegedly being operated upon 

ISLAMABAD: Pakistani authorities and a global animal rights advocacy group, PETA, will be working on replacing animals in medical training, classroom dissection exercises and setting up a national non-animal research method database in the South Asian country, the animal rights group said on Friday. 

The statement came after a meeting of PETA officials and Salman Sufi, head of Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s strategic reforms unit, to discuss several potential collaboration topics relating to animal rights in Pakistan. 

These topics included helping Pakistani provinces and universities transition to using more effective, ethical and economical non-animal simulation models for veterinary education, implementing an education program to help children and adults better appreciate how to share the world with animals, and assisting with repatriation efforts for non-native species who have been cruelly trafficked into Pakistan to be kept as household pets and decorations. 

“PETA will be sending follow-up information to Mr. Sufi for his consideration in implementing other strategic important reforms — including replacing the use of animals in medical training, classroom dissection exercises, and biomedical research with superior, state-of-the art methods, as well as setting up a national non-animal research methods database and working to implement PETA’s Research Modernization Deal in Pakistan,” the animal rights group said in a statement. 

“We look forward to a long and productive collaboration that will benefit animals, advance human health, and boost Pakistan’s status on the world stage.” 

In a rare move to ensure animal rights in Pakistan, the government on June 30 banned testing and surgeries on live animals at veterinary schools and industrial complexes in the federal capital, Islamabad, and announced a 15,000 rupee ($65) fine and jail term for animal cruelty offenders. 

The move came after widespread outrage in Pakistan over videos that went viral in May showing animals in various states of distress after allegedly being operated upon by veterinary students. Activists and members of the public widely condemned the practices and demanded action. 

Arab News last month interviewed about a dozen veterinary students belonging to Arid Agriculture University in Rawalpindi, the University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences in Lahore, Riphah International University in Islamabad and Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam. The students and graduates said they were aware that surgeries and experiments were performed at their institute on live animals but that anesthesia was administered. 

At veterinary schools around the world, the practice of using live animals to teach surgery has been on the decline in the last decade, but an Arab News investigation published on June 10 quoted students and university management saying live animals were being used to teach surgical skills, though they added proper procedures were followed. 

On July 18, PETA also wrote to Riphah International University in Islamabad, citing the June 10 article published by Arab News and seeking a response to the investigation suggesting that the institution required students to obtain stray dogs for harmful surgical practice training. 

The animal rights group urged Riphah International University campuses to immediately implement Sufi’s policy ban on the use of live animals in testing and surgical veterinary training as well as use superior and humane simulation models in veterinary and zoology training. 


Pakistan’s Afghan salvo risks turning ‘open war’ into long crisis

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan’s Afghan salvo risks turning ‘open war’ into long crisis

  • Nuclear-armed Pakistan has a formidable military of 660,000 active personnel, backed by a fleet of 465 combat aircraft
  • But the Taliban have the option to lean on insurgent groups like the TTP and the BLA to move beyond border skirmishes

KARACHI: Weeks after the Taliban’s lightning offensive in 2021 wrested control of Afghanistan from a US-led military coalition, Pakistan’s then intelligence chief flew into the capital Kabul for talks, where the serving lieutenant general told a reporter: “Don’t worry, everything will be okay.”

Five years on, Islamabad — long seen as a patron of the Taliban — is locked in its heaviest fighting with the group, which Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif described on Friday (February 27) as an “open war.”

The turmoil means that a wide swathe of Asia — from the Gulf to the Himalayas — is now in flux, with the United States building up a military deployment against Afghanistan’s neighbor Iran even as relations between Pakistan and arch rival India remain on edge after four days of fighting last May.

At the heart of the conflict with Afghanistan is Pakistan’s accusation that the Afghan Taliban provides support to militant groups, including the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), that have wreaked havoc across inside the South Asian country.

The Afghan Taliban, which has previously fought alongside the TTP, denies the charge, insisting that Pakistan’s security situation is its internal problem.

The disagreement is a reflection of starkly incompatible positions taken by both sides, as Pakistan expected compliance after decades of support to the Taliban, which did not see itself beholden to Islamabad, analysts said.

“We all know that the government in Pakistan supported the Taliban, the Afghan Taliban for many years, in the 90s and the 2000s, and provided havens to them during the period where the US and NATO were in Afghanistan.

So there’s a very close relationship between the Taliban and Pakistan,” said Jennifer Brick Murtazashvili, a political scientist at the University of Pittsburgh and an Afghanistan expert.

“It’s really surprising and shocking to many of us to see how quickly this relationship deteriorated,” she said.

Although tensions have simmered along their rugged 2,600-km (1,615-mile) frontier for months, following clashes last October, Friday’s fighting is notable because of Pakistan’s use of warplanes to hit Taliban military installations instead of confining the attacks to the militants it allegedly harbors.

These include targets deep inside the country in Kabul, as well as the southern city of Kandahar, the seat of Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzada, according to Pakistan military spokesman Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry.

The clashes are unlikely to end there.

“I think in the immediate aftermath, I think hostilities will subside. There will be, I hope there will be a ceasefire through mediation. But I do not see these tensions subsiding in the foreseeable future,” said Abdul Basit,  an expert on militancy and violent extremism at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

Nuclear-armed Pakistan has a formidable military of 660,000 active personnel, backed by a fleet of 465 combat aircraft, several thousand armored fighting vehicles and artillery pieces.

Across the border, the Afghan Taliban has only around 172,000 active military personnel, a smattering of armored vehicles and no real air force.

But the battle-hardened group, which took on a phalanx of Western military powers in 2001 and outlasted them, has the option to lean on insurgents like the TTP and the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), moving beyond border skirmishes.

Based in Pakistan’s largest and poorest province of Balochistan that borders both Iran and Afghanistan, the BLA has been at the center of a decades-long insurgency, which in recent years has staged large coordinated attacks.

Pakistan has long accused India of backing the insurgents, a charge repeatedly denied by New Delhi, which has retained a robust military deployment along the border since last May.

Although a raft of countries with influence — including China, Russia, Turkiye and Qatar — have indicated an openness to help mediate the conflict, all such efforts have been met with limited success so far.