Sri Lanka begins process of electing new president after Rajapaksa quits

An army soldier soldier stands guard outside the parliament building in Colombo, Sri Lanka, Saturday, July 16, 2022. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 16 July 2022
Follow

Sri Lanka begins process of electing new president after Rajapaksa quits

  • President Gotabaya Rajapaksa submitted his resignation on Friday.
  • Political parties to hand in nominations on July 19

COLOMBO: Sri Lankan lawmakers convened on Saturday to begin the process of electing a new leader, after president Gotabaya Rajapaksa fled overseas and resigned following mass protests over the country’s economic collapse.

Rajapaksa submitted his resignation on Friday as he left for Singapore, after he fled to the Maldives earlier in the week to escape a popular uprising over the role his family played in Sri Lanka’s worst economic meltdown since independence from Britain in 1948.

For months, the island nation of 22 million people has suffered through shortages of essential goods and days’-long fuel queues, while foreign exchange reserves dwindled close to zero and headline inflation hit 54.6 percent last month.

Protests over the crisis that began in Colombo in March and rippled across the nation culminated last week, when thousands of demonstrators stormed government buildings to demand the country’s leadership to resign. They continued to occupy the facilities until Thursday afternoon.

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe was sworn in as interim president on Friday, and will serve in the role until the Sri Lankan parliament elects a successor to Rajapaksa, whose term ends in 2024.

Parliament’s secretary general, Dhammika Dasanayake, announced that nominations for the election of a new president will be heard on July 19.

“If more than one member is proposed and seconded, the parliament is required to fix a date and time for the holding of the election,” Dasanayake said during a brief session on Saturday.

“That date should not be later than 48 hours from the time of receiving nominations.”

Dasanayake also read out Gotabaya’s resignation letter, the contents of which were not previously made public.

“I believed that the best possible steps were taken at the time to curb this crisis,” Rajapaksa said in the letter.

“I was born in this country and this is my motherland, and I have been working for the nation with all sincerity and I will continue my services toward the greater good of the country.”

Rajapaksa’s ousting formally ended the rule of his family’s political dynasty over Sri Lanka, where for years members had held top government positions. But protesters are against the idea of electing the current interim president, who they say still works in the family’s interest.

Wickremesinghe was selected as the ruling party’s candidate for president, while the opposition is nominating Sajith Premadasa. Another senior ruling party lawmaker from the Sri Lanka Freedom Party, Dullas Alahapperuma, has also announced his candidacy.

“We have told all the legislators in the parliament not to elect Ranil Wickremesinghe as the president, who is the henchman of the Rajapaksa family,” Namal Jayaweera, one of the protest leaders, told Arab News.

“Gotabaya purposefully planted Ranil as the prime minister to look after his family’s interests. Ranil will be another wolf in sheep’s clothing,” he said.

Wickremesinghe, who has faced calls to step down and whose own house was occupied by protesters last weekend, previously said that he would quit his premiership when a new government is formed.

Security was tight around the Parliament building in Colombo on Saturday, with armed masked soldiers on guard and streets near the building closed to the public.

Mohammed Ihsaan Huzain, a Colombo-based medical student who took part in the mass protests, told Arab News that Sri Lanka needs “dedicated politicians who can work with all sincerity,” after a “heartless government” that was “deaf and blind” to the people’s sufferings.

“Our mission does not end with the expulsion of Gotabaya Rajapaksa,” he said. “We can see the end of the tunnel, which gives us hope and confidence.”


UK veterans are ‘ticking time bomb’ after Iraq war chemical exposure

Updated 59 min 52 sec ago
Follow

UK veterans are ‘ticking time bomb’ after Iraq war chemical exposure

  • Fifteen former RAF personnel were deployed to the Qarmat Ali water plant in 2003, which was contaminated with sodium dichromate
  • Veterans say they were not screened or protected, and are now living with serious health conditions

LONDON: Fifteen British servicemen who worked on a carcinogen-contaminated water treatment site during the Iraq war say they were not offered biological screening despite official guidance saying they should have been.

The former Royal Air Force members, who have suffered from ailments including cancer, tumors and nosebleeds, told Sky News they were offered no medical assistance or subsequent treatment after having been exposed to toxic sodium dichromate at the Qarmat Ali water treatment plant in 2003.

The channel said it had seen a letter from the RAF’s medical authority stating that senior officers knew of the dangers posed by the substance.

Peter Lewis, 53, was one of 88 personnel deployed to guard the site, which was deemed vital for getting Iraq’s oil industry up and running. He told Sky: “I’ve had eight or nine operations to remove cancer.

“I’ve had so many lumps taken out of my neck, one on my face. This is something I’m literally fighting every year now. It’s constant.”

Qarmat Ali, the former troops say, was covered in ripped bags of bright orange sodium dichromate.

“We were never warned what the bags of chemicals were,” Jon Caunt, another former serviceman, said. “We were breathing this stuff in.”

His former comrade Tony Watters added: “I never thought about what it was. We were told the site is safe.”

Several months after deployment to the site, however, the servicemen were joined by two workers wearing protective gear who placed signs around it reading: “Warning. Chemical hazard. Full protective equipment and chemical respirator required. Sodium dichromate exposure.”

Watters said: “When you left the site, your uniform was contaminated, your webbing was contaminated.

“You went in your sleeping bag, and that was contaminated. And you were contaminating other people with it back at camp.”

Andy Tosh, who has led the group of veterans as they sought answers from the Ministry of Defence, said: “Even with the warning signs going up … they kept us there. They knowingly kept us exposed.”

The RAF gave some of the men a leaflet on their return to the UK, warning of the dangers of the substance, but not all were told.

The letter seen by Sky acknowledging the dangers posed to the veterans made a “strong” link to “increased risk of lung and nose cancer” as well as numerous other issues. It suggested personnel sent to Qarmat Ali should have their medical records altered to mention their exposure to sodium dichromate.

“Offer biological screening. This cannot be detailed until the numbers exposed are confirmed,” the letter also said.

An inquiry into US personnel deployed to Qarmat Ali found that 830 people were “unintentionally exposed” to sodium dichromate, giving them access to support from the US Department of Veterans Affairs. This came after the death of Lt. Col. James Gentry from cancer in 2009, which the US Army determined came “in line of duty for exposure to sodium dichromate.”

There has been no such inquiry by UK authorities despite British personnel being deployed at the site for longer than their American counterparts.

Thirteen of them have suffered from cancer and similar symptoms, including one who developed a brain tumor.

Jim Garth told Sky: “My skin cancer will never go away … It’s treatable, but when the treatment is finished, it comes back, so I’ve got that for life really.”

Lewis added: “I’m actually getting to the point now where I don’t care anymore … sooner or later, it’s going to do me.”

Caunt described his former colleagues’ conditions as a “ticking time bomb.”

He added: “We do not know what’s going to happen in the future."

The MoD insists medical screening was offered to personnel at the time, despite the men stating that it was not. In 2024, several met with Labour MPs about the issue. One, John Healey, who is now the UK defence secretary, said at the time the veterans should have “answers to their important questions.”

In a statement, the MoD said: “We take very seriously the concerns raised by veterans who were deployed to guard the Qarmat Ali Water Treatment Plant in 2003.

“As soon as we were alerted to the possible exposure of Sodium Dichromate, an environmental survey was conducted to evaluate typical exposure at Qarmat Ali. Results showed that the levels at the time were significantly below UK government guidance levels.”

A 2004 letter seen by Sky News suggested, however, that the MoD knew the levels of sodium dichromate were higher.

“Anyone who requires medical treatment can receive it through the Defence Medical Services and other appropriate services,” the MoD said.

“Veterans who believe they have suffered ill health due to service can apply for no-fault compensation under the War Pensions Scheme.”

Watters called on the government to hold an investigation into what happened at Qarmat Ali.

“We are the working class, we are ex-soldiers who have put our lives on the line and you’re turning a blind eye to us,” he said.

Garth added: “We felt let down at Qarmat Ali all those years ago, and we still feel let down now.”