Pakistan FM calls OIC chief, discusses ‘Islamophobic actions’ by Indian government 

This combination of photos shows Pakistan Finance Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari (L) and Chief of Organization of Islamic Cooperation Hissein Brahim Taha. (AFP & SPA)
Short Url
Updated 13 June 2022
Follow

Pakistan FM calls OIC chief, discusses ‘Islamophobic actions’ by Indian government 

  • Development came after two demonstrators were killed in India protests against anti-Islam comments 
  • Islamabad describes footage of Indian forces opening fire on unarmed protesters as ‘horrific beyond belief’ 

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Sunday telephoned the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) secretary-general Hissein Brahim Taha and discussed with him the recent “Islamophobic actions” by the ruling dispensation in India, the Pakistani foreign office said.

The development came amid a crackdown by Indian authorities on Muslim demonstrators protesting insulting remarks against Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) by two officials of India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

The BJP said it had suspended one official and expelled the other, but protests continued in the South Asian country where Muslims took to streets to raise their voice against the derogatory remarks. Clashes erupted after police shot dead two protesters in the eastern city of Ranchi after a demonstration that followed a Friday prayer congregation.

While the Pakistani foreign office described the footage of Indian forces opening fire on unarmed protesters as “horrific beyond belief,” Bhutto-Zardari told the OIC secretary-general the derogatory remarks by high-ranking BJP officials had deeply hurt the sentiments of Muslims around the globe.

“The conversation focused on the series of Islamophobic actions by the ruling dispensation in India, in particular the derogatory remarks against Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him) made by two senior officials of the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP),” the Pakistani foreign office said in a statement.

“He (Bhutto-Zardari) strongly condemned the high-handed treatment by the Indian authorities of the peaceful protests after Friday prayers over the derogatory remarks, which was the latest manifestation of the Indian government’s ongoing persecution of Muslims.”

The foreign minister urged the OIC and its member states to step up their efforts to protect the life, dignity, property, culture, heritage and religious freedoms of Indian Muslims.

“The OIC Secretary General expressed deep concern over the insulting remarks, as well as the unending plight of Indian Muslims,” the Pakistani foreign office said further. “OIC was sensitive to the growing trend of Islamophobia and the need to take collective action to combat it.”

Both sides decided to remain in contact to explore “avenues of combatting Islamophobia in India and mitigating the sufferings of Indian Muslims,” it added.


Sindh assembly passes resolution rejecting move to separate Karachi

Updated 21 February 2026
Follow

Sindh assembly passes resolution rejecting move to separate Karachi

  • Chief Minister Shah cites constitutional safeguards against altering provincial boundaries
  • Calls to separate Karachi intensified amid governance concerns after a mall fire last month

ISLAMABAD: The provincial assembly of Pakistan’s southern Sindh province on Saturday passed a resolution rejecting any move to separate Karachi, declaring its territorial integrity “non-negotiable” amid political calls to carve the city out as a separate administrative unit.

The resolution comes after fresh demands by the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) and other voices to grant Karachi provincial or federal status following governance challenges highlighted by the deadly Gul Plaza fire earlier this year that killed 80 people.

Karachi, Pakistan’s largest and most densely populated city, is the country’s main commercial hub and contributes a significant share to the national economy.

Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah tabled the resolution in the assembly, condemning what he described as “divisive statements” about breaking up Sindh or detaching Karachi.

“The province that played a foundational role in the creation of Pakistan cannot allow the fragmentation of its own historic homeland,” Shah told lawmakers, adding that any attempt to divide Sindh or separate Karachi was contrary to the constitution and democratic norms.

Citing Article 239 of Pakistan’s 1973 Constitution, which requires the consent of not less than two-thirds of a provincial assembly to alter provincial boundaries, Shah said any such move could not proceed without the assembly’s approval.

“If any such move is attempted, it is this Assembly — by a two-thirds majority — that will decide,” he said.

The resolution reaffirmed that Karachi would “forever remain” an integral part of Sindh and directed the provincial government to forward the motion to the president, prime minister and parliamentary leadership for record.

Shah said the resolution was not aimed at anyone but referred to the shifting stance of MQM in the debate while warning that opposing the resolution would amount to supporting the division of Sindh.

The party has been a major political force in Karachi with a significant vote bank in the city and has frequently criticized Shah’s provincial administration over its governance of Pakistan’s largest metropolis.

Taha Ahmed Khan, a senior MQM leader, acknowledged that his party had “presented its demand openly on television channels with clear and logical arguments” to separate Karachi from Sindh.

“It is a purely constitutional debate,” he told Arab News by phone. “We are aware that the Pakistan Peoples Party, which rules the province, holds a two-thirds majority and that a new province cannot be created at this stage. But that does not mean new provinces can never be formed.”

Calls to alter Karachi’s status have periodically surfaced amid longstanding complaints over governance, infrastructure and administrative control in the megacity, though no formal proposal to redraw provincial boundaries has been introduced at the federal level.