FM Ismail denies Russia has offered cheaper oil to Pakistan

Pakistani finance minister Miftah Ismail (right) gives interview to CNN’s Becky Anderson on May 31, 2022. (Screengrab taken from CNN interview)
Short Url
Updated 31 May 2022
Follow

FM Ismail denies Russia has offered cheaper oil to Pakistan

  • Ex-PM Khan last week criticized government for not pursuing his administration’s ‘deal’ with Moscow 
  • FM Miftah Ismail says former government wrote letter to Russian federation that was never responded to 

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Finance Minister Miftah Ismail on Tuesday said Russia had not offered cheaper oil to Pakistan, contrary to what was claimed by former prime minister Imran Khan. 

Khan on May 26 criticized the government of PM Shehbaz Sharif for not pursuing his administration’s “deal” for the procurement of oil from Russia on 30 percent cheaper rates. His remarks came in response to Rs30 hike in petroleum prices. 

The former prime minister also gave the example of India, a strategic ally of the United States, saying New Delhi had “managed to reduce fuel prices by PKR25 per liter by buying cheaper oil from Russia.” 

“The previous government wrote a letter to Russia federation that letter was never responded to. Russia has also not offered us any oil and it is now under sanction so it very difficult for me to imagine buying Russian oil,” FM Ismail told CNN’s Becky Anderson in an interview. 

“If Russia were to offer us oil at cheaper rate and there were no sanctions on Pakistan to buy Russian oil sure, we would consider that but at this point I think that it would be not possible for Pakistani banks to open LCs (Letters of Credit) or to arrange to buy Russian oil and nor for that matter has the Russian federation offered to sell us any oil.” 

The minister, however, said Pakistan was willing to buy wheat either from Russia and Ukraine. “We have actually asked, either Ukraine or Russia, whichever country sells us wheat we are happy to buy wheat from them,” he said. 

Cash-strapped Pakistan increased the prices of petroleum products to help revive the $6 billion International Monetary Fund (IMF) loan program it secured in 2019. 

The IMF insisted that Pakistan withdraw around $2 billion subsidies on fuel and electricity prices, which were announced by the former Khan government for the months of April, May and June. The South Asian nation is facing a worsening balance-of-payment crisis due to declining foreign exchange reserves, linked in part with its oil imports. 

The revival of the IMF program will see the release of around $1 billion to Pakistan and help unlock funding from other multilateral donors. 


Pakistan’s transportation strike could cause economic losses of $1 billion, warn analysts

Updated 41 min 22 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan’s transportation strike could cause economic losses of $1 billion, warn analysts

  • Traders, textile mill owners say strike has cost $60 million per day in exports, port demurrages, detention charges
  • Analysts warn 10-day strike could threaten economic stability by deepening inflation, widening current account deficit

KARACHI: Pakistan’s ongoing transportation strike has the potential to cause economic losses of up to $1 billion and threaten macroeconomic stability in the country, a leading economist warned this week. 

Transport unions have been protesting against stricter enforcement of axle-load limits — legal caps on how much weight trucks can carry — as well as increases in toll taxes and what they describe as heavy-handed policing on highways and motorways.

The strike, which began on Dec. 8, is now in its tenth day. It has slowed the flow of goods between ports, industrial centers and markets, raising concerns over supply chains in an economy heavily reliant on road transport for domestic trade and exports. Trucking is the backbone of Pakistan’s logistics system, moving food, fuel, raw materials and manufactured goods. 

“We are expecting a tremendous impact of the ongoing transportation strike,” Ahsan Mehanti, CEO of Arif Habib Commodities, told Arab News on Tuesday. 

“I believe that the major impact could be to the tune of $1 billion. And the reason behind that is primarily Karachi being a business hub will be most impacted with the ongoing strike.”

While a section of the transporters, the All Pakistan Goods Transport Association (APGTA) called off the strike after successful talks with the Punjab government on Friday, the rest of the transporters have vowed to continue the disruption. 

Manufacturers and exporters from the textile industry, which earns Pakistan the highest amount in exports, have estimated their daily losses at more than $60 million. 

Kamran Arshad, chairman of the All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (APTMA), said these losses were on account of disruption to exports as well as demurrage and detention charges that affected traders are bound to pay at local ports.

“I have estimated disruption to as much as $60 million ($540 million for nine-day losses) worth of exports and demurrage and detention charges of up to $300 per container per day stuck at ports,” Arshad said.

Arshad lamented that the textile industry was facing a critical situation as raw materials and essential inputs were stuck at ports and not reaching factories. On the other hand, finished export consignments were also unable to reach ports, he said. 

“Containers are stuck at mills, ports and depots and inventories are building up,” the APTMA chief said. “And backlogs are growing by the day.”

Pakistan Textile Exporters Association (PTEA) Patron-in-Chief Khurram Mukhtar calculated Pakistan’s monthly average textile exports at $1.5 billion.

“An eight-day transport shutdown alone has already caused approximately $400 million in export losses, with severe supply chain disruptions on top,” Mukhtar said. 

’BIG HIT’ TO EXPORTS

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has tasked his government to ensure sustained economic growth through an export-driven economy. However, Pakistan’s exports have shown far from promising results, falling by 15 percent to $2.4 billion in November, according to data by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS). 

From the July-November period of this fiscal year, the country’s exports declined by six percent to $12.8 billion, while imports surged by 13 percent to $28.3 billion. This widened the trade deficit by 37 percent to $15.5 billion.

Arshad said other than financial losses, the trade industry was suffering from “serious reputational damage” when it came to international buyers due to the strike’s disruptions. 

“Missed delivery schedules result in cancelations and loss of future orders,” he told Arab News. “And once a buyer is lost, it is extremely difficult to regain their confidence.”

Rehan Hanif, president of the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI), agreed. 

“Our exports are already in trouble forcing us to run after dollars, so the exports are going to take a big hit,” Hanif explained. 

He urged the government to engage transporters and address their “genuine” demands immediately. 

Information Minister Attaullah Tarar and Finance Adviser Khurram Schehzad did not respond to queries sent by Arab News till the filing of this report. 

Hanif said the prolonged strike had created a huge backlog of cargos at local ports.

“They would have no space for more containers if this strike persisted for a couple of more days,” he said. “Pakistan’s daily losses from the strike are running in billions of rupees.”

POSSIBLE INFLATION SPIKE

However, Karachi Port Trust spokesperson Shariq Amin Farooqui rejected Hanif’s claims, saying that cargo “is coming and leaving” the country’s largest port smoothly. 

Pakistan’s inflation rose by 6.1 percent in November and is expected to fall in the SBP’s target range of 5 to 7 percent this financial year, which is ending in June. 

Pakistan’s current account balance reported a $112 million deficit in October from an $83 million surplus in September, according to the central bank. 

Mehanti warned the strike could pose dangers to Pakistan’s hard-earned macroeconomic stability.

“Inflation will be higher, and the current account deficit will be higher due to challenging economic situation,” he said.