Pakistan’s Khan says had good ties with Trump, laments Biden ‘never got in touch’

Former Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan speaks to CNN in an interview on May 23, 2022. (Screengrab from the interview posted on PTI's Facebook account)
Short Url
Updated 24 May 2022
Follow

Pakistan’s Khan says had good ties with Trump, laments Biden ‘never got in touch’

  • Ex-PM says US official who allegedly communicated to Pakistan envoy to Washington that Khan be ousted should be fired
  • Khan was voted out of power by parliament last month in a no-trust motion and PMLN leader Shehbaz Sharif became PM

ISLAMABAD: Former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan said in an interview broadcast on Monday that he had a “perfectly good relationship” with the US administration of President Donald Trump but did not understand why the new government of Joe Biden “never got in touch” with him.

Khan has said friction seemingly began between Pakistan and the US after Biden assumed office in January 2021. Khan’s government, while in power, had repeatedly complained thereafter that the new US president had not contacted the Pakistani PM.

In June last year, Khan said the US had asked Pakistan if it could use its military bases for counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan after international forces pulled out of the war-torn country in August 2021. According to Khan, he had refused, further straining ties. American officials have variously denied the US made such a request.

In recent months, Khan has also accused Washington of working with his political opponents in Pakistan to orchestrate his ouster through a no-confidence motion. The US has repeatedly denied the accusation. Khan was voted out of power by parliament last month in the no-trust motion and Shehbaz Sharif, a leader of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz party, was voted into power.

“I had a perfectly good relationship with the Trump administration,” Khan said in an interview to CNN. “It’s only when the Biden administration came, and it coincided with what was happening in Afghanistan [withdrawal of US forces], and for some reason, which I still don’t know, I never, they never got in touch with me.”

“There was no US ambassador to Pakistan,” he added.

New US ambassador to Islamabad, Donald Bloom, took charge today, Monday.

In the interview, Khan repeated allegations that the US had plotted to oust him, saying US Assistant Secretary of State for Central and South Asia, Donald Lu, who allegedly communicated to Pakistan’s ambassador to the US that Khan needed to be ousted, should be fired.

“He [Lu] tells our Ambassador in an official meeting … he tells the ambassador that unless you get rid of your Prime Minister Imran Khan in a vote of no confidence … he said, unless you get rid of him, Pakistan will suffer consequences,” Khan said. “And then goes on to say, of course, if you get rid of him through the vote of no confidence, all will be forgiven. Such arrogance.”

“This guy should be sacked for bad manners and sheer arrogance. Imagine telling a country, ambassador of a country of 220 million people, that you can get rid of your prime minister.”


Pakistan’s Afghan salvo risks turning ‘open war’ into long crisis

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan’s Afghan salvo risks turning ‘open war’ into long crisis

  • Nuclear-armed Pakistan has a formidable military of 660,000 active personnel, backed by a fleet of 465 combat aircraft
  • But the Taliban have the option to lean on insurgent groups like the TTP and the BLA to move beyond border skirmishes

KARACHI: Weeks after the Taliban’s lightning offensive in 2021 wrested control of Afghanistan from a US-led military coalition, Pakistan’s then intelligence chief flew into the capital Kabul for talks, where the serving lieutenant general told a reporter: “Don’t worry, everything will be okay.”

Five years on, Islamabad — long seen as a patron of the Taliban — is locked in its heaviest fighting with the group, which Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif described on Friday (February 27) as an “open war.”

The turmoil means that a wide swathe of Asia — from the Gulf to the Himalayas — is now in flux, with the United States building up a military deployment against Afghanistan’s neighbor Iran even as relations between Pakistan and arch rival India remain on edge after four days of fighting last May.

At the heart of the conflict with Afghanistan is Pakistan’s accusation that the Afghan Taliban provides support to militant groups, including the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), that have wreaked havoc across inside the South Asian country.

The Afghan Taliban, which has previously fought alongside the TTP, denies the charge, insisting that Pakistan’s security situation is its internal problem.

The disagreement is a reflection of starkly incompatible positions taken by both sides, as Pakistan expected compliance after decades of support to the Taliban, which did not see itself beholden to Islamabad, analysts said.

“We all know that the government in Pakistan supported the Taliban, the Afghan Taliban for many years, in the 90s and the 2000s, and provided havens to them during the period where the US and NATO were in Afghanistan.

So there’s a very close relationship between the Taliban and Pakistan,” said Jennifer Brick Murtazashvili, a political scientist at the University of Pittsburgh and an Afghanistan expert.

“It’s really surprising and shocking to many of us to see how quickly this relationship deteriorated,” she said.

Although tensions have simmered along their rugged 2,600-km (1,615-mile) frontier for months, following clashes last October, Friday’s fighting is notable because of Pakistan’s use of warplanes to hit Taliban military installations instead of confining the attacks to the militants it allegedly harbors.

These include targets deep inside the country in Kabul, as well as the southern city of Kandahar, the seat of Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzada, according to Pakistan military spokesman Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry.

The clashes are unlikely to end there.

“I think in the immediate aftermath, I think hostilities will subside. There will be, I hope there will be a ceasefire through mediation. But I do not see these tensions subsiding in the foreseeable future,” said Abdul Basit,  an expert on militancy and violent extremism at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

Nuclear-armed Pakistan has a formidable military of 660,000 active personnel, backed by a fleet of 465 combat aircraft, several thousand armored fighting vehicles and artillery pieces.

Across the border, the Afghan Taliban has only around 172,000 active military personnel, a smattering of armored vehicles and no real air force.

But the battle-hardened group, which took on a phalanx of Western military powers in 2001 and outlasted them, has the option to lean on insurgents like the TTP and the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), moving beyond border skirmishes.

Based in Pakistan’s largest and poorest province of Balochistan that borders both Iran and Afghanistan, the BLA has been at the center of a decades-long insurgency, which in recent years has staged large coordinated attacks.

Pakistan has long accused India of backing the insurgents, a charge repeatedly denied by New Delhi, which has retained a robust military deployment along the border since last May.

Although a raft of countries with influence — including China, Russia, Turkiye and Qatar — have indicated an openness to help mediate the conflict, all such efforts have been met with limited success so far.