Yemeni truce ‘broadly holding’: UN envoy

UN special envoy Hans Grundberg gives a press conference at Sanaa's international airport before his departure from the Yemeni capital, on April 13, 2022. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 14 April 2022
Follow

Yemeni truce ‘broadly holding’: UN envoy

  • Hans Grundberg, Security Council members laud $3bn Saudi, UAE aid package
  • Emirati representative welcomes “unprecedented consensus” towards ending war

LONDON: A two-month truce agreed between parties to the Yemeni conflict at the start of April is “broadly holding,” UN Envoy Hans Grundberg told the Security Council on Thursday.

He said no confirmed airstrikes or cross-border attacks had been reported, but he urged all sides to commit to bringing an end to the seven-year conflict.

“I want to thank the Yemeni government for their leadership and for making compromises to reach this agreement,” Grundberg told the UN Security Council, thanking Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Oman for their efforts.

“What we now need is work on the political front. The truce is the result of the parties’ commitment but it is temporary, and we must take this rare moment to pivot towards a peaceful future.”

Grundberg, China, India, Russia, the UK and the US welcomed the $3 billion aid package announced by Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which will see $2 billion put into the Yemeni Central Bank.

A further $1 billion supplied by the Saudis will be put towards projects benefiting the Yemeni people.

Having been agreed on April 1, the truce came into effect the following evening and covers the Houthi militia and the internationally recognized Yemeni government.

Abdullah Al-Saadi, Yemen’s permanent representative to the UN, urged the UNSC to increase efforts to reduce attacks by the Tehran-backed militia.

“The Houthis want to remain a tool in the hand of Iran. They have used ballistic missiles that have killed civilians and destroyed civilian infrastructure, and we urge the council to play its role as a moral authority and exert pressure on them to respect the peace,” he said. “Our country nonetheless is committed to all provisions of the truce.”

Linda Thomas-Greenfield, US ambassador to the UN, urged “movement towards a comprehensive ceasefire,” with her Chinese, Indian and Russian counterparts all echoing her comments to bring the war to an end.

China’s Zhang Jun said: “It is in no one’s interests to resume hostilities in Yemen, and the humanitarian crisis in the country is one of the worst in the world.”

India’s representative TS Tirumurti condemned cross-border attacks against Saudi Arabia last month, saying he “hoped the ceasefire would put an end to the violence and terror.” He added: “India has extended humanitarian aid to Yemen in the past, and we remain committed to this.”

Martin Griffiths, undersecretary-general for humanitarian affairs, said the truce had resulted in civilian casualties falling to their lowest numbers in months, with fuel ships arriving in Hodeidah reducing costs of living.  

But Yemenis are “still struggling to survive,” and increased aid is needed so as not to offset “today’s good news,” he added.

“Furthermore, we call on all parties to facilitate access in line with international humanitarian law, and call on Houthi authorities to release two UN staff members that were arrested earlier this year,” he said.

“On top of which, we are seeking the release of five members of staff abducted in February and who have not been seen for 60 days now.”

Representatives from multiple countries noted the “increased optimism” that the ongoing truce was engendering.

Emirati representative Lana Zaki Nusseibeh said she was pleased to see “unprecedented consensus” towards ending the war.

“We express our gratitude towards the efforts of the secretariat of the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) to bridge the divide between the Yemeni parties… but renew our condemnation of Houthi terrorist attacks,” she added.

“This delicate agreement brings renewed hope, but we call on regional stakeholders to find a peaceful solution.”


International aid groups grapple with what Israel’s ban will mean for their work in Gaza

Updated 58 min 45 sec ago
Follow

International aid groups grapple with what Israel’s ban will mean for their work in Gaza

  • The most immediate impact of the license revocation is that Israel will no longer allow the groups to bring supplies into the Gaza Strip or send international staffers into the territory

TEL AVIV: Israel’s decision to revoke the licenses of more than three dozen humanitarian organizations this week has aid groups scrambling to grapple with what this means for their operations in Gaza and their ability to help tens of thousands of struggling Palestinians.
The 37 groups represent some of the most prominent of the more than 100 independent nongovernmental organizations working in Gaza, alongside United Nations agencies. Those banned include Doctors Without Borders, the Norwegian Refugee Council, Oxfam and Medical Aid for Palestinians.
The groups do everything from providing tents and water to supporting clinics and medical facilities. The overall impact, however, remains unclear.
The most immediate impact of the license revocation is that Israel will no longer allow the groups to bring supplies into the Gaza Strip or send international staffers into the territory. Israel says all suspended groups have to halt their operations by March 1.
Some groups have already been barred from bringing in aid. The Norwegian Refugee Council, for example, said it has not been allowed to bring in supplies in 10 months, leaving it distributing tents and aid brought in by other groups.
Israel says the banned groups make up only a small part of aid operations in Gaza.
But aid officials say they fulfill crucial specific functions. In a joint statement Tuesday, the UN and leading NGOs said the organizations that are still licensed by Israel “are nowhere near the number required just to meet immediate and basic needs” in Gaza.
The ban further strains aid operations even as Gaza’s over 2 million Palestinians still face a humanitarian crisis more than 12 weeks into a ceasefire. The UN says that although famine has been staved off, more than a quarter of families still eat only one meal a day and food prices remain out of reach for many; more than 1 million people need better tents as winter storms lash the territory.
Why were their licenses revoked?
Earlier this year, Israel introduced strict new registration requirements for aid agencies working in Gaza. Most notably, it required groups to provide the names and personal details of local and international staff and said it would ban groups for a long list of criticisms of Israel.
The registration process is overseen by Israel’s Ministry for Diaspora Affairs and Combating Antisemitism, led by a far-right member of the ruling Likud party.
Israel says the rules aim to prevent Hamas and other militants from infiltrating the groups, something it has said was happening throughout the 2-year-old war. The UN, which leads the massive aid program in Gaza, and independent groups deny the allegations and Israeli claims of major diversion of aid supplies by Hamas.
Aid organizations say they did not comply, in part, because they feared that handing over staff information could endanger them. More than 500 aid workers have been killed in Gaza during the war, according to the United Nations.
Israel denies targeting aid workers. But the group say Israel has been vague about how it would use the data.
The groups also said Israel was vague about how it would use the data.
“Demanding staff lists as a condition for access to territory is an outrageous overreach,” Doctors Without Borders, known by its French acronym MSF, said Friday. It said Israeli officials had refused its attempts to find alternatives.
A December report on MSF issued by an Israeli government team recommended rejection of the group’s license. It pointed primarily to statements by the group criticizing Israel, including referring to its campaign in Gaza as genocide and calling its monthslong ban on food entering the territory earlier this year as “a starvation tactic.” It said the statements violated neutrality and constituted “delegitimization of Israel.”
The report also repeated claims that an MSF employee killed in by an Israeli airstrike in 2024 was an operative with the Islamic Jihad militant group. That, it said, suggested MSF “maintains connections with a terrorist group.”
MSF on Friday denied the allegations, saying it would “never knowingly employ anyone involved in military activities.” It said that its statements cited by Israel simply described the destruction its teams witnessed in Gaza.
“The fault lies with those committing these atrocities, not with those who speak of them,” it said.
Aid groups have a week from Dec. 31 to appeal the process.
Medical services could see biggest impact
Independent NGOs play a major role in propping up Gaza’s health sector, devastated by two years of Israeli bombardment and restrictions on supplies.
MSF said Israel’s decision would have a catastrophic impact on its work in Gaza, where it provides funding and international staff for six hospitals as well as running two field hospitals and eight primary health centers, clinics and medical points. It also runs two of Gaza’s five stabilization centers helping children with severe malnutrition.
Its teams treated 100,000 trauma cases, performed surgeries on 10,000 patients and handled a third of Gaza’s births, the group says. It has 60 international staffers in the West Bank and Gaza and more than 1,200 local staff — most medical professionals.
Since the ceasefire began in early October, MSF has brought in about 7 percent of the 2,239 tons (2,032 metric tons) of medical supplies that Israel has allowed into Gaza, according to a UN tracking dashboard. That makes it the largest provider of medical supplies after UN agencies and the Red Cross, according to the dashboard.
Medecins du Monde, another group whose license is being halted, runs another four primary health clinics.
Overburdened Palestinian staff
Aid groups say the most immediate impact will likely be the inability to send international staff into Gaza.
Foreign staff provide key technical expertise and emotional support for their Palestinian colleagues.
“Having international presence in Gaza is a morale booster for our staff who are already feeling isolated,” said Shaina Low, communications adviser for the Norwegian Refugee Council, which is one of the main NGOs providing shelter supplies and fresh water to displaced people.
NRC has roughly 30 international staff who rotate in and out of Gaza working alongside some 70 Palestinians.
While any operations by the 37 groups in the West Bank will likely remain open, those with offices in east Jerusalem, which Israel considers its territory, might have to close.
Halt on supplies
Many of the 37 groups already had been blocked from bringing supplies into Gaza since March, said Bushra Khalidi, Oxfam’s policy lead for Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories.
What changes with the formal license revocation is “that these practices are now formalized, giving Israel full impunity to restrict operations and shut out organizations it disagrees with,” she said.
Some of the groups have turned to buying supplies within Gaza rather than bringing them in, but that is slower and more expensive, she said. Other groups dug into reserve stocks, pared down distribution and had to work with broken or heavily repaired equipment because they couldn’t bring in new ones.
Amed Khan, an American humanitarian philanthropist who has been privately donating medicine and emergency nutrition for children to Gaza, said the impact extends beyond the aid groups.
He relies on NGOs to receive and distribute the supplies, but the fewer groups that Israel approves, the harder it is to find one.
“It’s death by bureaucracy,” he said.