PM's fate in the balance as parliament session begins with no-trust motion on the agenda

Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan arrives to speak during the 74th Session of the General Assembly at UN Headquarters in New York on September 27, 2019. (AFP/FILE)
Short Url
Updated 03 April 2022
Follow

PM's fate in the balance as parliament session begins with no-trust motion on the agenda

  • Pakistani premier has suggested the process was "discredited," he might not accept the vote
  • Interior minister says Khan could be arrested after ouster unleashing new wave of protests

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Imran Khan's political future is at stake today, Sunday, as Pakistan's lower house of parliament will vote on a no-confidence motion against the premier, a move he says has been orchestrated by the United States (US).

Opposition parties filed the no-trust motion against PM Khan on March 8, accusing him of economic meltdown, foreign policy failures and poor governance.

Under the Pakistani constitution, a prime minister is elected by a majority of the lower house, the National Assembly. A candidate needs a simple majority of legislators, 172, to vote for him to become prime minister. That is the same number of votes against him in a no-confidence vote needed to oust him and dissolve his cabinet.

On Sunday, opposition and ruling coalition lawmakers gathered at the National Assembly for a session that was scheduled to begin on 1130am but started shortly after noon.

Outside parliament, a small number of supporters of the PM gathered and shouted slogans. Media reported that police had moved to arrest some protesters who had entered a no-go zone.

“Democracy is in great danger,” Interior Minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmed told reporters ahead of the vote. “When Imran Khan leaves [from PM’s office after no-confidence vote], they [opposition] will not tolerate him, they will arrest him. When they arrest him, a new layer of protests will flow through the whole country.”

On Saturday, the PM suggested in remarks to reporters he might not accept the vote to oust him, saying the process had been "discredited" and the move was a "blatant interference in domestic politics by the United States." In speeches earlier, Khan has also spoken about a purported letter that proved a foreign conspiracy to topple his government. The US has denied the allegations.

"How can I accept the result when the entire process [of the no-confidence vote] is discredited?" Khan told a select group of foreign journalists at his office on Saturday. "Democracy functions on moral authority — what moral authority is left after this connivance?"

Ahead of Sunday's vote, up to 100 members of the opposition filed a no-confidence request against National Assembly speaker Asad Qaiser.

Security has been beefed up in Islamabad, with hundreds of police and paramilitary troops deployed in the capital's Red Zone, a heavily protected area and home to major government offices and foreign embassies.

The opposition collectively had 162 members, while the government had the support of 179 lawmakers, including its coalition partners.  

In recent weeks, however, defections by over a dozen of his party's lawmakers and the exit of coalition partners, including the Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P), Balochistan Awami Party (BAP) and the Jamhoori Watan Party (JWP), have left Khan short of a simple majority.

MQM-P has seven members in the National Assembly, BAP has five and JWP has only one seat. The opposition has said it is now in excess of votes to oust the prime minister.

Khan could survive a no-confidence vote even if he gets fewer votes than the opposition but only if the latter does not secure the 172 votes that make up a majority in the 342-seat house.

If Khan loses the vote, parliament can continue to function until its five-year tenure ends in August 2023, after which a general election is due within 60 days.

There will be a vote in the National Assembly to elect a new prime minister to serve until then. Candidates can be put forward by any party with legislators in the assembly.

The new prime minister can, however, call a general election immediately, without waiting until 2023.

Some constitutional analysts say the assembly can be dissolved and a general election held if no candidate can secure a majority of votes to become the prime minister.


Pakistan condemns Netanyahu’s ‘hexagon of alliances’ plan, says alert to growing India-Israel defense ties

Updated 26 February 2026
Follow

Pakistan condemns Netanyahu’s ‘hexagon of alliances’ plan, says alert to growing India-Israel defense ties

  • Israel’s Netanyahu last week proposed an alliance of countries in and around Middle East against its adversaries
  • Pakistan maintains “robust military preparedness” to deter any potential aggression, says foreign office spokesperson

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s foreign office spokesperson on Thursday condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent statement about forming a “hexagon of alliances” within or around the Middle East, saying Islamabad was alert to growing defense ties between New Delhi and Tel Aviv. 

Netanyahu on Sunday outlined plans to form a new regional bloc, describing it as a “hexagon of alliances” that he said could include Israel, India, Greece and Cyprus, along with other unnamed Arab, African and Asian states. He said the grouping would collectively stand against what he described as “radical” adversaries.

His comments came days before Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in Israel on Wednesday for a two-day trip to bolster ties. The two are expected to discuss cooperation in science and technology, innovation, agriculture, water management, technology, defense and security during the trip. 

The statement drew a sharp response from Pakistan’s Senate, which unanimously passed a resolution on Tuesday rejecting Netanyahu’s remarks.

“I would also like to draw your attention to the recent resolution adopted by the Senate of Pakistan that strongly condemned such remarks and attempts to undermine Muslim unity,” Foreign Office spokesperson Tahir Andrabi told reporters during a weekly press briefing.

“We continue to condemn these provocative steps and statements by the leadership of the occupying power that threaten regional peace and stability,” he added.

Netanyahu had also said Israel’s goal was to create an axis of nations that see eye to eye against what he described as the “radical Shia” and “radical Sunni” axis of nations. 

Andrabi said attempts to divide the Muslim world along sectarian lines were a “nefarious design” on Netanyahu’s part.

India is Israel’s largest arms buyer and second-largest trading partner in Asia, after China. In response to a question on India’s growing defense ties with Israel, Andrabi said Pakistan remained cognizant of the risks posed by such cooperation.

“Yes, we remain seized of the defense ties between Israel and India,” the spokesperson said, noting that certain “systems and platforms” may have been used by India against Pakistan in the past.

“We are alive to the threats they pose to our security, sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as to regional peace and stability.”

Andrabi said Pakistan maintained “robust military preparedness” to deter any potential aggression from hostile forces.

‘UTMOST CAUTION EXERCISED’

Andrabi spoke about Pakistan’s recent strikes against alleged militant camps in Afghanistan, saying Islamabad had conducted them in self-defense and with extreme caution to avoid casualties. 

Pakistan said it carried out airstrikes in Afghanistan against militant camps and hideouts in three provinces on Saturday night, killing over 100 militants. Afghanistan accused Pakistan of violating its territorial sovereignty and killing dozens of civilians. Kabul has vowed to retaliate. 

Andrabi said the strikes were carried out to ensure protection for the lives of the people of Pakistan and to prevent “imminent terrorist attacks.”

“These actions were directed solely against identified terrorist camps and hideouts, and utmost caution was exercised to prevent harm to civilians,” he said. 

He warned Pakistan would take necessary measures under its right to self-defense against “terrorist threats” emanating from Afghan territory.

On the safety of Pakistani nationals in Afghanistan following the strikes, Andrabi said Islamabad had raised the issue with Afghan authorities, adding that Islamabad expected “foolproof security” for Pakistani diplomats and civilians.