VIENNA: The UN nuclear watchdog’s Board of Governors backed a resolution on Thursday that “deplores” Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and urges it to let Ukraine control all its nuclear facilities, diplomats said.
Russia, which with China voted against the resolution, said it was based on “politically motivated lies and mistakes.”
The resolution was passed at an emergency meeting of the 35-nation Board called by Canada and Poland on Ukraine’s behalf. Its language echoed a resolution backed by the UN General Assembly on Wednesday.
It urges Moscow to “immediately cease all actions against, and at, the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant and any other nuclear facility in Ukraine, in order for the competent Ukrainian authorities to preserve or promptly regain full control.”
Russia has seized the spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste facilities next to the now defunct power plant at Chernobyl, site of the world’s worst nuclear disaster.
Russian troops have also seized the area around the biggest of Ukraine’s four power plants at Zaporizhzhya, north of the Crimean peninsula.
It is the first time war has broken out in a country with such a large and established nuclear program, the IAEA says.
Twenty-six countries backed the resolution, diplomats said. Five nations — Pakistan, India, South Africa, Senegal and Vietnam — abstained. Mexico and Burundi were absent.
“The #IAEA BoG resolution on nuclear security in #Ukraine contains intentional politically motivated lies and mistakes,” Russia’s envoy to the IAEA, Mikhail Ulyanov, said on Twitter.
“Russia is requested ‘to cease all actions against nuclear facilities’. We asked 3 times to provide concrete facts in this regard. Total silence in response,” he said.
The vote comes amid negotiations on reviving Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal, in which Russia is an important player.
Pakistan abstains from vote as IAEA board ‘deplores’ Russian invasion of Ukraine
https://arab.news/nsc5q
Pakistan abstains from vote as IAEA board ‘deplores’ Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Russia, which with China voted against IAEA resolution, said it was based on “politically motivated lies and mistakes”
- Twenty-six countries backed the resolution while Pakistan, India, South Africa, Senegal and Vietnam abstained
Pakistan rules out talks with Afghanistan, says over 330 Afghan fighters killed in clashes
- Clashes between the neighbors erupted after Pakistan’s airstrikes on Afghan territory last weekend
- US voices support for Pakistan, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar says they aim to make Pakistan safe
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has ruled out any talks with Afghanistan until an end to “terrorism” emanating from the Afghan soil, officials said on Friday, following the killing of more than 330 Afghan fighters in cross-border clashes this week.
The latest clashes between the neighbors erupted after Pakistan’s airstrikes on Afghan territory last weekend triggered Afghan retaliatory attacks along the border on Thursday, escalating long‑simmering tensions over Pakistan’s claim that Afghanistan shelters Pakistani Taliban militants. Afghanistan denies this and argues Pakistan is deflecting blame for its own security failures.
Pakistani Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said they had killed 331 Afghan fighters, destroyed over 100 posts and targeted 37 military locations across Afghanistan. Afghan officials have said that more than 50 Pakistani soldiers have been killed and several Pakistan posts have been captured by their forces. None of the casualty figures or battlefield claims from either side could be independently verified.
Meanwhile, Mosharraf Zaidi, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s spokesperson for foreign media, ruled out any talks with Afghanistan until Kabul addresses the issue as the United States (US) expressed his support for what it called Pakistan’s “right to defend itself” against attacks from Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers.
“There won’t be any talks, there is nothing to talk about... Terrorism from Afghanistan has to end,” Zaidi told Pakistani state media, saying Islamabad would continue to target militant havens inside Afghanistan.
“Pakistan’s responsibility is to protect its citizens. If we know that there is a terrorist in point A and we know that there is a terrorist enabler at point A, we will find a weapon to land at point A and eliminate the threat.”
Zaidi said he didn’t expect Pakistan to deviate from this position and that the government had clearly conveyed what it was doing.
“We have clearly articulated what we are doing and what we plan on continuing to do and what it will take for us to stop doing what we are doing,” Zaidi said.
“And we will expect that both the international community and the regime in question, the Afghan Taliban, will come to their senses and will help reduce instability and disorder in this region.”
Pakistan is a major non-NATO ally of Washington, while the US considers the Afghan Taliban to be a “terrorist” group.
“The United States supports Pakistan’s right to defend itself against attacks from the Taliban, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist group,” Reuters quoted a State Department spokesperson as saying. US diplomat Allison Hooker said on X she spoke on Friday with Pakistan Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch.
The State Department spokesperson said Washington was aware of the escalation in tensions and “outbreak of fighting between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban,” adding the US was “saddened by the loss of life.”
“The Taliban have consistently failed to uphold their counterterrorism commitments,” the State Department said, adding that “terrorist groups use Afghanistan as a launching pad for their heinous attacks.”
Meanwhile, Afghan Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid called for talks to resolve the crisis.
“We have always emphasized peaceful resolution, and now too we want the issue to be resolved through dialogue,” he said on Friday afternoon.
Asked what Pakistan desired, Information Minister Tarar said: “Neutralizing the threat and ensuring that Pakistan is safe.”
“Because for us, we’ve been good neighbors, we’ve been very friendly neighbors, we’ve been very, very generous neighbors. Our generosity, unfortunately, has often been seen as our weakness,” he told state media.
“So the objective, aim is to neutralize the threat and make Pakistan safe.”
To a question about a ceasefire, Tarar said it was “too early” to comment on that as it was an evolving situation.
