Amid Ukraine crisis, PM Khan on ‘tightrope’ between Russia and West during Moscow visit

The photograph takes on December 31, 2021, shows Pakistan's Prime Minister Imran Khan (center) in Islamabad, Pakistan. (Photo courtesy: Imran Khan/Twitter)
Short Url
Updated 24 February 2022
Follow

Amid Ukraine crisis, PM Khan on ‘tightrope’ between Russia and West during Moscow visit

  • PM Imran Khan is expected to have ‘wide ranging’ discussions with President Vladimir Putin
  • This is the first visit of a Pakistani prime minister to Russia since 1999

ISLAMABAD: Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan’s visit to Moscow on Wednesday put the South Asian country on a “tightrope” as the first meeting between the two nations in over two decades takes place amid an escalating standoff between Russia and Ukraine.

Khan will have “wide-ranging” discussions, including on energy cooperation, with Russian President Vladimir Putin during the two-day visit, according to a statement from Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry.

His visit, the first of a Pakistani prime minister to Russia since 1999, comes as much of the West aligns against Russia amid increasing fears of an invasion of Ukraine.

Ahead of the trip, the Pakistani leader expressed hope for a peaceful resolution of the conflict, but said his trip was unrelated to the crisis.

“This (Ukraine crisis) does not concern us. We have a bilateral relationship with Russia, and we really want to strengthen it,” Khan said in an interview with Russia’s state-owned television network RT.

“Now, what we want to do is not become part of any bloc. We want to have trading relations with all countries,” he added.

Uzair Younus, director of the Pakistan Initiative at the Washington-based Atlantic Council advocacy group, said this week’s visit puts Khan on a tightrope between Russia and the West.

“Pakistani leaders must walk a tightrope that balances the emerging Russia relationship with its historical and economically vital relations with the West,” Younus told Arab News.

He said Khan must only focus on Pakistan-Russia ties, and “refrain from inserting Pakistan into the Russia-Ukraine tensions.”

He added: “The PM and his team must remain cognizant of the fact that Pakistan’s core economic interests are aligned with Western powers.”

Annual exports to the US, UK and EU combined amounted to over $12 billion, Younus said, while exports to Russia amounted to $163 million.

Faisal Karim Kundi from the opposition Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) fears that Khan’s Moscow visit will affect trade relations with the US and Europe.

“Unfortunately, we cannot afford (that) at this time when our economy is already very fragile and under pressure,” Kundi said.

Experts said the visit should be viewed in its bilateral context, especially when such high-level meetings were planned in advance.

Former prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi said it “should not be a problem for any other country.”

“What is happening in Ukraine is a separate issue and should be dealt with in different United Nations forums,” Abbasi said.

Abdul Basit, a research fellow at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore, said it was an important visit for Pakistan, though there was a chance that it could be misconstrued at the international level.

“This can take Pakistan’s relations with Russia from defense ties to trade level ties and also fulfill Pakistan’s growing energy needs,” Basit told Arab News.

Former foreign secretary Tehmina Janjua said the US and other western countries would understand that such a bilateral visit was not related to the Ukraine crisis.

“Pakistan and Russia have been working on this visit since 2020,” she told Arab News. “We should also not worry that it will have an adverse impact on Pakistan’s relations with the US and other western countries.”


Pakistan weighs Trump Gaza board amid expert calls for Muslim allies’ consultations

Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan weighs Trump Gaza board amid expert calls for Muslim allies’ consultations

  • Former diplomats warn board could sideline UN, legitimize US unilateral plans
  • Analysts say Pakistan should assert independent positions if it joins the body

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is weighing an invitation from US President Donald Trump to join a proposed international “Board of Peace” on Gaza, a move that has sparked debate among former diplomats and foreign policy experts who warned Tuesday it could sideline the United Nations and urge Islamabad to consult close Muslim allies.

The White House announced on Friday some members of the board, which is expected to supervise the temporary governance of Gaza under a fragile ceasefire in place since October and continue beyond that transitional phase.

These names included US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump’s special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, former British prime minister Tony Blair and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. Trump himself would chair the board, according to a plan unveiled by the White House in October.

Pakistan’s foreign office confirmed on Sunday that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had also received an invitation to join the proposed body, stressing that “the country will remain engaged with international efforts for peace and security in Gaza, leading to a lasting solution to the Palestine issue in accordance with United Nations resolutions.”

“Since the Trump ‘Board of Peace’ is more like an international NGO now, which would include [Indian Prime Minister Narendra] Modi and [Israel’s Benjamin] Netanyahu, Pakistan should carefully take a decision in consultation with its close Muslim allies like Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, Egypt and Indonesia, and it should be a joint decision of these countries together,” Former federal minister and analyst Mushahid Hussain told Arab News.

“Otherwise, there is no point in being in the queue just to please Trump,” he added.

Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas have agreed that a Palestinian technocratic administration would operate under the oversight of an international board during a transitional period.

Hussain said that if Pakistan did decide to join the board, it should use the platform to clearly articulate its long-held positions.

“Pakistan should play the role of boldly promoting the right of self-determination of the peoples of Palestine and Kashmir, both occupied territories, and oppose any aggression against Iran, as peace and occupation or aggression cannot coexist,” he said.

International affairs analyst and author Naseem Zehra said Pakistan’s participation could still be justified if it allowed Islamabad to assert independent positions on global conflicts.

“Donald Trump has invited 60 heads of states and prime ministers to become part of the peace board, which is more like an alternative to the United Nations,” she said, referring to media reports about the board’s mandate. “If Pakistan is invited among 60 countries, it is acceptable for Pakistan to participate, and with a seat at the table, Pakistan can share its own view of how global issues can be resolved.”

Zehra added that Pakistan’s past diplomatic conduct showed it could maintain principled positions while engaging internationally.

Former ambassador to the United States Maleeh Lodhi took a stronger view, warning that the initiative appeared designed to bypass established international mechanisms.

“Pakistan should not join the Board for many reasons,” she said. “Its aim is for President Trump to get international support and legitimacy for his unilateral plans not just in Gaza but beyond, without member states having any real power.”

“It is being set up to supplant the UN in its primary role of maintaining international peace and security, with Trump effectively calling all the shots,” she added.

When contacted, Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif declined to comment and referred queries to the foreign office.

However, the foreign ministry spokesman Tahir Andrabi did not respond to Arab News requests for comment by the time of filing.

Pakistan has consistently supported Palestinian statehood under United Nations resolutions and has publicly criticized Israeli military operations in Gaza, while also opposing broader regional escalations, including attacks on Iran.