Mother of killed pregnant newlywed feels ‘stuck in nightmare’

Fawziyah Javed died after falling from Arthur's Seat in Edinburgh. (Social media)
Short Url
Updated 30 December 2021
Follow

Mother of killed pregnant newlywed feels ‘stuck in nightmare’

  • Fawziyah Javed, 31, allegedly pushed from popular tourist peak in Edinburgh, Scotland
  • Her husband, who she had recently married, has been charged with murder

LONDON: The mother of a newly married and pregnant woman who died after being allegedly pushed off a hill peak by her husband has spoken about her grief over the loss of her daughter.

Fawziyah Javed, 31, fell from Arthur’s Seat, a site popular with tourists for its views over Edinburgh, Scotland, on Sep. 2 this year.

She was pregnant and expecting a baby boy.

Her husband, Kashif Anwar, 27, has been charged with murder. He appeared in an Edinburgh court in September for a short hearing and made no plea.

Javed’s mother, Yasmin Javed, said that the death of her only child had “left a void in her and her husband’s lives.”

She added that she and her husband, Mohammed, had been “not living, just existing” over the past three months, and that she “feels like I’m stuck in a nightmare I’ll never wake up from.”

Her daughter’s death, she said, had “rocked” her West Yorkshire community and left the family “traumatized.”

Yasmin added: “All day I’ve been crying until my tears have run dry. We are devastated, our world has collapsed. She was our only child, and she was pregnant with her first child at the time.

“To lose a child under any circumstances would be painful, but when it’s your only child and your unborn first grandson too, I have no words to describe my pain. We will never, ever get over this. The light is gone from our lives … there is no quality of life for us,” she told The Times newspaper.

The young newlywed worked as a solicitor and was dedicated to her charity work, said her mother.

Fawziyah spent much of her time supporting a wide array of charities working for young people, the homeless and various other causes. Her mother said that she hopes to continue her legacy of charity work by urging the public to make charitable donations in her honor.

The family has also set up a GoFundMe page to raise charitable donations.

Yasmin said: “She was a very caring person, she cared about other people and wanted to make a difference. Helping people gave her so much fulfillment — she was so passionate about it.

“She was a selfless person who wore her heart on her sleeve. She was very kind and considerate.”


Unprecedented gagging order over Afghan data breach should have been avoided, former secretary says

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Unprecedented gagging order over Afghan data breach should have been avoided, former secretary says

  • Ben Wallace tells MPs that he had ordered time-limited injunction to protect lives of Afghan veterans
  • Sensitive details of thousands was leaked via email mistake because ‘someone didn’t do their job’ 

LONDON: The former UK defense secretary has said he would not have proposed a secret gagging order to conceal the catastrophic data breach that threatened the lives of thousands of Afghans.

Ben Wallace told MPs on Tuesday that he had ordered a time-limited injunction to protect the news of the data leak, The Independent reported.

At the time, in mid-2023, the Ministry of Defence had scrambled the learn the source of the leak, which took place when an official accidentally emailed a sensitive spreadsheet containing Afghans’ contact details outside of the ministry.

It led to the publication of the identities of thousands of Afghans who had served alongside British forces during the war against the Taliban, placing them at risk of reprisal.

They were secretly relocated to the UK, and the leak was only revealed to the British public when a High Court judge lifted a superinjunction last year.

It followed a longtime lobbying effort by The Independent and other news organizations to have the details of the leak released.

Wallace told MPs: “We are not covering up our mistakes. The priority is to protect the people in Afghanistan and then open it up to the public. We need to say a certain amount are out of danger.”

On the indefinite injunction, he added: “I didn’t think it was the right thing to do; I didn’t think it was necessary.

“I said, ‘we’re not doing that.’ The only thing we’re going to do, is we need to basically hold off in public until we get to the bottom of the threat these people are under. I said we won’t cover up our mistakes; we’ll talk about them.”

The rules surrounding a superinjunction forbid even mentioning its existence.

Wallace said: “You can have an injunction, I think, without reporting the contents … a superinjunction; my understanding is you can’t even say there’s an injunction. I think I would never have been in that space. Public bodies are accountable. If necessary you could even ring up the journalist and say ‘please hold off, people are at risk.’ Most journalists don’t want to put people at risk.”

The superinjunction was applied by a judge shortly after Wallace had left government.

It came after the MoD applied to the High Court for a regular injunction.

Grant Shapps, the subsequent defense secretary, then maintained the gagging order until the 2024 general election, when the Labour opposition took government.

Wallace blamed the 2022 breach on negligence, adding: “Someone didn’t do their job.”

The former defense secretary had implemented new checking procedures in the ministry after another Afghan data breach, but that “that clearly didn’t happen on this occasion; someone clearly didn’t do their job,” he told MPs.

Wallace said that military and defense spending is not a priority for voters, “partly because they don’t know” the true nature of the threat facing Britain.