For Afghanistan, T20 World Cup match win a symbol of a nation’s will to survive 

Afghanistan's players celebrate the dismissal of Scotland's Mark Watt (not pictured) during Twenty20 World Cup cricket match between Afghanistan and Scotland in Sharjah on October 25, 2021. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 09 December 2021
Follow

For Afghanistan, T20 World Cup match win a symbol of a nation’s will to survive 

  • On Monday, the Afghan team dished out a 130-run shellacking to Scotland in Group II at the Twenty20 World Cup
  • Many residents of Kabul described the victory as a “comeback for the nation” and a signal “Afghanistan still exists”

KABUL: Residents of Kabul on Tuesday rejoiced over Afghanistan’s recent victory against Scotland in a T20 World Cup game, celebrating the win as the first slice of good news to emerge from the war-torn country since a Taliban takeover in mid-August and proof of a nation’s will to survive. 
On Monday, the Afghan team dished out a 130-run shellacking to Scotland in Group II at the Twenty20 World Cup.
The win marks another high point in the remarkable rise of Afghanistan’s cricket team.
Emerging from dusty refugee camps in Pakistan and only officially formed in 1995, the Afghan national team has overcome hurdles — war, terrorism, displacement — unknown to most athletes and now consistently ranks in the world’s top 10.
Despite practicing in often primitive conditions amid the insecurities of daily life, the team, and players like leg spinner Rashid Khan, arguably the most famous Afghan alive, and big-hitting batter Mohammad Nabi, have become the face of hope for a nation long at war. 
Monday’s win cemented that feeling for many Afghans.
“Raising the Afghanistan national flag and the playing of the national anthem in these games indicates that Afghanistan can still breathe,” Kabul resident Abdul Ahad Hassani told Arab News. “Beating Scotland by a huge margin by Afghanistan National Team in the T20 cricket World Cup shows that Afghanistan still exists, and no one can defeat the new generation that we have.”
The optimism is in contrast to the grim outlook for the country, which is in a severe economic crisis and whose interim Taliban-led government has not yet been recognized by any nation in the world. 
Even so, said Ali Khan Shanghai, a shopkeeper in Kabul, Monday’s victory showed “that a country in the name of Afghanistan still exists.”
Due to visa issues, the Afghan team arrived in the UAE late for the tournament and with the experience of having played only three T20 internationals against Zimbabwe since March last year due to the coronavirus pandemic.
But the victory was a “great comeback” for the nation and the team, said Abdul Saboor Atayee, a student at the Al-Azhar University in Kabul.
“We are still here,” he told Arab News. 
While the Taliban are not in favor of public entertainment and banned many forms of it during their previous rule in 1996-2001, officials celebrated the cricket win.
Taliban government spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid took to social media to wish the team more success.
“Congratulations to all Afghans on the victory of the Afghan team in the ongoing World Twenty20,” Mujahid tweeted on Monday. “Congratulations to the team and wish them more success in the future.”
Afghanistan’s permanent representative-designate to the United Nations and former Taliban spokesman, Suhail Shaheen, also tweeted:
“Well done boys! May Allah favor you with future victories.”
Afghanistan Cricket Board (ACB) member Hajji Hassin Zadran told Arab News there was hope for more wins in the tournament.
Afghanistan will next take on neighboring Pakistan on Friday.
“We hope that in this T20 [tournament], we would be one of the major teams,” Zadran said. “Our lions created history, they are the cause of smiles, and we wish them further success.”


Trump takes unconventional approach to communicating to the public about war in Iran

Updated 57 min 58 sec ago
Follow

Trump takes unconventional approach to communicating to the public about war in Iran

  • The communications strategy opened Trump to criticism that he hadn’t done enough to explain the rationale and objectives of the war

Typical of an unconventional presidency, the Trump administration waited more than 48 hours to make any live, public communication to the American people about why it had decided to go to war with Iran.
President Donald Trump discussed why he launched the attack prior to a White House ceremony honoring military heroes on Monday but took no questions from reporters. Earlier in the day, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Caine briefed journalists at the Pentagon.
The two days previous, Trump delivered two pretaped statements that were released on Truth Social, the social media site owned by the president’s media company, and granted telephone interviews to more than a dozen journalists — several of which produced fragmented responses that, to some, clouded as much as they cleared up.
The communications strategy opened Trump to criticism that he hadn’t done enough to explain the rationale and objectives of the war, even as the American military suffered its first casualties. By contrast, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has teamed with the US against Iran, delivered two statements the day the war began and addressed reporters Monday at the site of a missile attack that killed nine people. The Israeli military has held multiple press briefings each day.
“The American people need a commander in chief, and he has been absent in that role,” Rahm Emanuel, White House chief of staff under President Barack Obama, said on CNN Monday. Emanuel, a Democrat, is contemplating a run for the presidency in 2028.
An unconventional strategy leads to criticism
Peter Baker, chief White House correspondent for The New York Times, wrote on social media that “after Trump launched a new war on Iran, he did not rush back to the White House to make an Oval Office address to rally the nation as other presidents have done. He stayed at Mar-a-Lago to attend a glitzy political fundraiser.”
That post provoked a response from Steven Cheung, White House communications director. “Imagine being a reporter so consumed with Trump Derangement Syndrome that he wants President Trump to mimic the failed policies of the past. The truth is that President Trump spent the majority of his time monitoring the situation in a secure facility, in constant contact with world leaders, and made multiple addresses to the nation that garnered hundreds of millions of views. He also took dozens of calls with reporters.”
The calls included one with Baker’s colleague at The Times, Zolan Kanno-Youngs. Trump’s mobile phone number is known to many of the reporters who cover him, and the president often takes their calls for on-the-spot interviews. Besides The Times, he spoke in the aftermath of the attack to journalists for ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, CNBC, Fox News Channel, The Atlantic, The Washington Post, Axios, Politico and an Israeli television station.
Most of the calls were brief and marginally illuminating; Politico’s Dasha Burns said Trump answered but said he was too busy to talk. The public couldn’t hear what Trump said in the interviews and was dependent upon what the journalists chose to report on the conversations.
“I spoke to President Trump today and he told me that the operation in Iran is going to go very fast,” Libby Alon, a reporter for Channel 14 News in Israel, wrote about her interview on X. “It’s doing very well, and (will) make the people of Israel very happy, and the people of the world very happy.”
The Times reported that in its six-minute chat, Trump “offered several seemingly contradictory visions of how power might be transferred to a new government — or even whether the existing Iranian power structure would run that government or be overthrown.”
In one of his two conversations with Trump, ABC News’ Jonathan Karl said when he asked about the death of Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the president said: “I got him before he got me. They tried twice. Well I got him first.” CNN’s Jake Tapper went on the air minutes after his conversation Monday, saying Trump told him “the big one is coming soon,” an apparent reference to a future attack.
Asked for comment, White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said: “President Trump is the most transparent and accessible president in American history. The American people have never had a more direct and authentic relationship with a president of the United States than they have with President Trump.”
Hegseth briefing concentrates on friendly reporters
Pentagon reporters learned late Sunday about Hegseth’s briefing. Reporters from The Associated Press, Reuters, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News Channel and Stars & Stripes were permitted into the briefing room, but Hegseth did not call on them. Instead, he took questions from NewsNation and Trump-friendly outlets like the Daily Caller, Daily Wire, One America News and the Christian Broadcasting Network. Most mainstream news outlets left their regular stations at the Pentagon last fall rather than agree to Hegseth’s rules restricting their work.
Hegseth denounced the “foolishness” of people wanting to know details of the operation in advance, such as whether Americans would commit to more than air power, and said the operation would continue as long as it took to achieve objections. He initially ignored NBC News’ Courtney Kube when she called out a question: “President Trump put a four-week time limit on it. Are you saying he’s wrong?”
Later, Hegseth denounced Kube for asking “the typical NBC sort of gotcha-type question. President Trump has all the latitude in the world to talk about how long it might take — four weeks, two weeks, six weeks, it could move up, it could move back. We’re going to execute at his command the objectives he set out to achieve.”
Unlike Pentagon briefings in past administrations, reporters were given assigned seats, with the Trump-friendly outlets seated in front. Jennifer Griffin, Hegseth’s former colleague at Fox News Channel who left the Pentagon with other reporters after not accepting his new rules, was seated in the last row.