I committed the crime, Zahir Jaffer says at indictment hearing in Noor Mukadam murder case

Zahir Jaffer (2nd from R), main suspect in murder of Noor Mukadam, sitting next to his father Zakir Jaffer (R) in a court in Islamabad on October 14, 2021. (Photo courtesy: Social Media)
Short Url
Updated 14 October 2021
Follow

I committed the crime, Zahir Jaffer says at indictment hearing in Noor Mukadam murder case

  • At hearing that lasted nearly three hours, district court in Islamabad indicted 12 people present in courtroom
  • Jaffer says he was in a relationship with Mukadam, asks court to “punish or forgive" him, appeals to be put under house arrest

ISLAMABAD: Zahir Jaffer, the prime suspect in the gruesome July murder of 27-year-old Noor Mukadam, said at an indictment hearing on Thursday that he had committed the “crime” but appealed to the judge to release him from jail and put him under house arrest.
At a hearing that lasted nearly three hours, a district and sessions court in Islamabad indicted 12 people present in the courtroom, including the main accused Jaffer, for their alleged involvement in the murder of Mukadam, the daughter of former Pakitani diplomat Shaukat Mukadam. Mukadam’s beheaded body was found at the Jaffer residence in Islamabad on July 20.
Others against whom charges were framed on Thursday include Jaffer's parents, Zakir Jaffer and Asmat Adamjee, their three household staff, Iftikhar, Jan Muhammad and Jameel, and six workers from Therapy Works, a counselling centre from where Jaffer had received certification to become a therapist and where he had been receiving treatment in the weeks leading up to the murder.
The court has now summoned witnesses on October 20 to record their statements and plans to complete the trial of all twelve suspects within eight weeks as ordered by the Islamabad High Court.
The trail will be one of the most closely watched in recent history, as Mukadam’s murder has sparked public outrage and grabbed media attention unlike any other recent crime against women.
“I accept I have committed this crime, now it’s up to you to punish or forgive me,” a somber looking Jaffer, visibly in low spirits unlike at previous hearings, said before additional sessions judge Atta Rabbani. “We quarrelled, and we both were angry, and this all happened.”
Jaffer was arrested from the crime scene on the day of the murder. He was initially on police remand but was moved to Adiala Jail in the city of Rawalpindi on judicial remand in early August where he has been detained since.
As lawyers for the Jaffer and Mukadam families presented arguments, Jaffer kept interrupting and saying speaking before the court was his “basic right.” At one point he sat down and started sobbing loudly.
“I want to apologise,” he said. “This case is related to me. You are hearing the lawyers of others but not giving me time.”
The accused said he had been in a relationship with Mukadam. At one point he turned to the victim’s father and said, “I was in a relationship with your daughter for the last three years. My life is now in your hands. Please have mercy on me.”
“But if you want to see me hanged, it’s okay and I’m ready for it.”
Jaffer also said Noor had offered herself for “the sacrifice.” It was unclear what he meant by “sacrifice.”
At multiple times during the hearing, the accused blamed Therapy Works staff for the murder, though it was unclear how their presence at the scene had led him to behead Mukadam. Police have said a team from the counselling centre was already at the crime scene when they arrived on July 20, having been summoned by Jaffer's parents who were in Karachi at the time of the crime.
“We had arguments, but if these people [Therapy Works staff] didn’t come in, this [the murder] would not have happened,” he added, pointing to Amjad, a Therapy Works employee indicted in the case. “He is the guy … I asked them [Therapy Works staff] to wait outside [my home] for at least thirty minutes, but they barged in through a window and this all happened.”
Jaffer also appealed to the judge to release him from jail and put him under house arrest.
“I can’t live in the jail, can’t lead such a life. I want to live a life where I have a wife and children.”
“Please tell me if you’re going to hang me,” he added. “Release me or forgive me.”
He requested the court multiple times to let him make a phone call, though he did not specify who he wanted to call.
Regarding a pistol found at the crime scene, Jaffer said both his and Mukadam’s fingerprints were found on the weapon.
“That pistol belongs to my father. And this all was in my father’s knowledge,” he said. It was unclear if he meant that his father knew he was going to commit a crime.


Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

Updated 57 min 11 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

  • Top court orders lower court to pause proceedings after lawyers allege due-process breaches
  • Mazari-Hazir, husband face charges under cybercrime law that carry up to 14 years in prison

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Thursday halted the cybercrime trial of prominent human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after their lawyers argued that a lower court had recorded witness testimony in their absence, violating due-process rules.

Mazari-Hazir, one of Pakistan’s most outspoken civil liberties lawyers, and Chattha are being prosecuted under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) over posts on X that authorities say incited ethnic divisions and portrayed the military as involved in “terrorism.” Both reject the allegations. If convicted under the relevant PECA provision, they face a prison term of up to 14 years.

The case has drawn broad attention in Pakistan’s legal community because Mazari-Hazir, who has been repeatedly detained over her criticism of the security establishment, argues that the trial court ignored basic procedural guarantees despite her medical leave request. The case also comes as Pakistan faces sustained scrutiny over the use of PECA against activists, journalists and political dissenters, with lawyers arguing that lower courts often move ahead without meeting minimum fair-trial standards.

The couple’s lawyer, Riasat Ali Azad, said his clients filed a petition in the Supreme Court because the lower court had moved ahead improperly.

“Today, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has stayed the lower court proceedings, the trial court proceedings and has said that the [Islamabad] High Court should decide our pending revision petition for which a date has already been fixed,” he told reporters.

Azad said the violation was clear under Pakistan’s Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires evidence to be recorded in the presence of the accused.

“Yet, on that very day, evidence of four witnesses was recorded in their absence, and a state counsel was appointed to conduct cross-examination on their behalf,” he said. “All these things are against the right to a fair trial under Articles 10 and 10-A.”

A three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar ordered the trial court to pause proceedings and instructed the Islamabad High Court to hear the couple’s pending criminal revision petition first.

The trial had been scheduled to resume on Dec.15, but the Supreme Court’s stay now freezes proceedings before both the additional sessions judge and the special PECA court. 

The Islamabad High Court is expected to hear the criminal revision petition next week.

Chattha, who is also a lawyer, said the SC ruling underscored the need for procedural safeguards.

“It is a victory for the constitution and the law,” he said, arguing that the trial court had ignored their request to re-record witness statements in their presence.