Iran approves 7 candidates for June presidential elections

Iranian vice-president Eshaq Jahangiri registers his candidacy for Iran's presidential elections, at the Interior Ministry in capital Tehran, on May 15, 2021, ahead of the presidential elections scheduled for June. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 25 May 2021
Follow

Iran approves 7 candidates for June presidential elections

  • Ahmadinejad earlier said he would boycott the elections if he was not allowed to run

DUBAI: Iran’s Ministry of Interior has confirmed seven candidates to run in June’s presidential elections, TV news channel Al-Arabiya reported.
The ministry has rejected requests made by the country’s former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Former Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani and Vice President Eshaq Jahangiri to run for presidency.
Ahmadinejad earlier said he would boycott the elections if he was not allowed to run.
The list of approved candidates by the Guardian Council, which is an unelected entity responsible for vetting candidates, includes judiciary chief Ebrahim Raisi, who is said to be seen as the most likely to succeed the incumbent President Hassan Rouhani.
“The prominent ultraconservative cleric, who is frequently mentioned as a possible successor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, looks to be the consensus candidate of Iranian conservatives in the upcoming June 18 vote,” the report said.
The list further includes former head of the Revolutionary Guards and secretary of the Expediency Discernment Council Mohsen Rezaei, former chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, and Central Bank governor Abdolnaser Hemmati.
Member of Parliament (MP) Amirhossein Ghazizadeh-Hashemi, MP Alireza Zakani, and former vice president Mohsen Mehralizadeh are the remaining three relatively low-profile candidates.


Editorial: The threat of Yemen’s fragmentation is far reaching

President of Yemen’s Presidential Leadership Council Rashad Mohammed Al-Alimi. (SABA Net)
Updated 25 December 2025
Follow

Editorial: The threat of Yemen’s fragmentation is far reaching

  • The southern issue is a just cause — one that must be addressed in any future political settlement and not reduced to the ambitions of any single individual, including the likes of Aidarous Al-Zubaidi

RIYADH: As Yemen’s political landscape continues to shift at a dizzying pace, it is worth pausing to reflect on the official Saudi position — and the commentary of some of our leading Saudi columnists — regarding the recent unilateral moves by the Southern Transitional Council (STC) in the governorates of Hadramout and Al-Mahrah. These actions, taken without the consent of the Presidential Leadership Council (PLC) or coordination with the Arab Coalition, represent a dangerous gamble with the future of a fragile nation — one that Saudi Arabia, like its Arab neighbors, wishes only peace, stability, and prosperity.
There is no ambiguity in the Kingdom’s stance: it has worked tirelessly to preserve calm in Hadramout and Al-Mahrah, steering both regions away from military escalation and toward peaceful solutions. In a bid to contain the situation, Saudi Arabia, in coordination with its brothers and partners in the United Arab Emirates and the PLC, dispatched a joint team to negotiate with the STC. The goal was clear — facilitate the withdrawal of STC forces and hand over military sites to the National Shield Forces.
Yet despite Riyadh’s call for de-escalation and its appeal to the STC to prioritize national interest and social cohesion, the Council has persisted in its confrontational posture, seemingly indifferent to the grave consequences of its actions.
Observers in Riyadh will note that the Kingdom remains steadfast in its support for the PLC and Yemen’s internationally recognized government. Its commitment to Yemen’s stability is not rhetorical — it is political, economic, and developmental. Saudi Arabia’s vision is to shepherd Yemen from the shadows of conflict into an era of peace, prosperity, and regional integration. This is not merely a function of geography or shared borders; it is a reflection of the Kingdom’s religious, political, and economic responsibilities in the Arab and Islamic world.
From this vantage point, the newspaper firmly believes that the STC’s unilateral actions in Hadramout constitute a blatant violation of Yemen’s transitional framework. They undermine the legitimacy of the recognized government, threaten the fragile peace, and jeopardize the political process. Worse still, they echo the very tactics employed by the Houthi militias — an alarming parallel that should not be ignored.
It is therefore essential to reiterate the Kingdom’s position: the STC must withdraw its forces from Hadramout and Al-Mahrah, restoring the status quo ante. This is not a punitive demand, but a necessary step to safeguard national security and prevent further military flare-ups.
At the same time, Saudi Arabia has consistently affirmed that the southern issue is a just cause — one that must be addressed in any future political settlement. It is enshrined in the outcomes of Yemen’s National Dialogue and must be resolved inclusively, reflecting the aspirations of all southern Yemenis — not reduced to the ambitions of any single individual, including the likes of Aidarous Al-Zubaidi or other STC figures.
Ultimately, we urge the separatists to choose reason over recklessness. Partitioning Yemen will not bring peace — it will sow the seeds of future wars, embolden extremist actors, and pose a threat not only to Yemen’s internal cohesion but to regional and international stability. As Western and American policymakers know all too well: what happens in Yemen never stays in Yemen.