Pakistan, Saudi envoys discuss PM Khan’s upcoming visit to Kingdom 

Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to Pakistan, Nawaf bin Said Al-Malki meeting the ambassador of Pakistan to KSA, Bilal Akbar at the Embassy of Pakistan in Riyadh May 02, 2021.( Courtesy: Embassy of Pakistan in Riyadh)
Short Url
Updated 04 May 2021
Follow

Pakistan, Saudi envoys discuss PM Khan’s upcoming visit to Kingdom 

  • Follows a meeting between both the ambassadors in Riyadh where they resolved to strengthen ties between the two nations 
  • Imran Khan is reportedly scheduled to begin his visit to Saudi Arabia on May 7 

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s new ambassador to Riyadh, Lt. Gen. (r) Bilal Akbar, met with Saudi Ambassador to Pakistan, Nawaf bin Said Al-Malki, in Riyadh on Sunday to discuss Prime Minister Imran Khan’s upcoming visit to the Kingdom, Pakistan Embassy in Riyadh tweeted. 

During the meeting, both ambassadors reaffirmed their resolve to further strengthen the “time tested brotherhood and friendship between the two countries, with a renewed emphasis on economic cooperation.” 

A source familiar with the matter told Arab News last week that Prime Minister Imran Khan’s three-day trip to Saudi Arabia is scheduled to begin on May 7. 

PM Khan will be visiting the Kingdom on the invitation of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. 

Last week, Ambassador Al-Malki told Arab News that “this visit will further strengthen relations between both countries in all fields,” adding that “there will be many memoranda of understanding” signed during the visit. 

The two countries had inked agreements for $20 billion investment projects, during the crown prince’s visit to Pakistan in February 2019. 

Al-Malki said that while work on the projects had “already begun,” a planned preferential trade agreement would also lead to broader economic cooperation. 


Pakistan rules out talks with Afghanistan, says over 330 Afghan fighters killed in clashes

Updated 3 min 19 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan rules out talks with Afghanistan, says over 330 Afghan fighters killed in clashes

  • Clashes between the neighbors erupted after Pakistan’s airstrikes on Afghan territory last weekend
  • US voices support for Pakistan, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar says they aim to make Pakistan safe

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has ruled out any talks with Afghanistan until an end to “terrorism” emanating from the Afghan soil, officials said on Friday, following the killing of more than 330 Afghan fighters in cross-border clashes this week.

The latest clashes between the neighbors erupted after Pakistan’s airstrikes on Afghan territory last weekend triggered Afghan retaliatory attacks along the border on Thursday, escalating long‑simmering tensions over Pakistan’s claim that Afghanistan shelters Pakistani Taliban militants. Afghanistan denies this and argues Pakistan is deflecting blame for its own security failures.

Pakistani Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said they had killed 331 Afghan fighters, destroyed over 100 posts and targeted 37 military locations across Afghanistan. Afghan officials have said that more than 50 Pakistani soldiers have been killed and several Pakistan posts have been captured by their forces. None of the casualty figures or battlefield claims from either side could be independently verified.

Meanwhile, Mosharraf Zaidi, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s spokesperson for foreign media, ruled out any talks with Afghanistan until Kabul addresses the issue as the United States (US) expressed his support for what it called Pakistan’s “right to defend itself” against attacks from Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers.

“There won’t be any talks, there is nothing to talk about... Terrorism from Afghanistan has to end,” Zaidi told Pakistani state media, saying Islamabad would continue to target militant havens inside Afghanistan.

“Pakistan’s responsibility is to protect its citizens. If we know that there is a terrorist in point A and we know that there is a terrorist enabler at point A, we will find a weapon to land at point A and eliminate the threat.”

Zaidi said he didn’t expect Pakistan to deviate from this position and that the government had clearly conveyed what it was doing.

“We have clearly articulated what we are doing and what we plan on continuing to do and what it will take for us to stop doing what we are doing,” Zaidi said.

“And we will expect that both the international community and the regime in question, the Afghan Taliban, will come to their senses and will help reduce instability and disorder in this region.”

Pakistan is a major non-NATO ally of Washington, while the US considers the Afghan Taliban to be a “terrorist” group.

“The United States supports Pakistan’s right to defend itself against attacks from the Taliban, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist group,” Reuters quoted a State Department spokesperson as saying. US diplomat Allison Hooker said on X she spoke on Friday with Pakistan Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch.

The State Department spokesperson said Washington was aware of the escalation in tensions and “outbreak of fighting between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban,” adding the US was “saddened by the loss of life.”

“The Taliban have consistently failed to uphold their counterterrorism commitments,” the State Department said, adding that “terrorist groups use Afghanistan as a launching pad for their heinous attacks.”

Meanwhile, Afghan Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid called for talks to resolve the crisis.

“We have always emphasized peaceful resolution, and now too we want the issue to be resolved through dialogue,” he said on Friday afternoon.

Asked what Pakistan desired, Information Minister Tarar said: “Neutralizing the threat and ensuring that Pakistan is safe.”

“Because for us, we’ve been good neighbors, we’ve been very friendly neighbors, we’ve been very, very generous neighbors. Our generosity, unfortunately, has often been seen as our weakness,” he told state media.

“So the objective, aim is to neutralize the threat and make Pakistan safe.”

To a question about a ceasefire, Tarar said it was “too early” to comment on that as it was an evolving situation.