PM Khan to seek vote of confidence from parliament as opposition demands fresh polls

Pakistan's Prime Minister Imran Khan (L) speaks during the National Assembly session in Islamabad, Pakistan on on June 25, 2020. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 04 March 2021
Follow

PM Khan to seek vote of confidence from parliament as opposition demands fresh polls

  • The government is confident of securing 181 votes in the 342-member National Assembly on Saturday
  • Analysts say the prime minister will cease to hold the country’s top political office if he fails to get the required number of votes

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Imran Khan will seek a vote of confidence from parliament on Saturday as the opposition Pakistan Democratic Movement alliance calls for his resignation and demands fresh elections in the country following the defeat of finance minister Abdul Hafeez Shaikh in a high-stakes Senate contest from Islamabad on Wednesday. 

“We are hundred percent sure that Prime Minister Imran Khan will succeed in getting the vote of confidence from the National Assembly,” Lal Chand, a parliamentary secretary for human rights, told Arab News on Thursday. 

Explaining the process, he said the confidence vote would take place in the 342-member National Assembly by counting the number of legislators for and against the motion. “This will be an open vote, and no buying of any member or horse-trading will be possible for the opposition,” Chand said. 

As per the constitution, the prime minister is required to secure at least 172 votes to retain his position. The parliamentary secretary, however, claimed that Khan would get more than 181 votes on Saturday.

Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party won the 2018 general elections but failed to get 172 seats to form the government on its own. It cobbled together a coalition with help of smaller parliamentary parties like Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan, Balochistan Awami Party and Pakistan Muslim League. The PTI has 157 seats in the National Assembly. 

An opposition politician Yousuf Raza Gilani defeated the finance minister Abdul Hafeez Shaikh on Wednesday after securing 169 votes. Gilani’s success suggested that some ruling party lawmakers had revolted against the PTI by not voting for Shaikh, analysts said. 

“If the prime minister fails to get the vote of confidence on Saturday, he will automatically cease to hold office as per the constitution,” Muddassir Rizvi, who works with the Free and Fair Election Network, told Arab News. 

He described the government’s decision to seek the vote of confidence as a “healthy move” that would help strengthen democratic process in the country. 

Rizvi added that members of parliamentary parties who voted against the party line would face disqualification from their seat. 

“A lawmaker can contest the election again after getting disqualified under the defection clause of the constitution as this penalty doesn’t apply for life,” he explained. 

The opposition earlier in the day demanded the prime minister to resign and called for fresh elections in the country, saying that the PTI administration had lost the majority in the house. 

“New elections are the only solution to come out of the current political and economic crisis,” Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, former prime minister and senior Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz leader, said while addressing a press conference along with other opposition members. 

About the prime minister’s vote of confidence, he said: “The time for fake vote of confidence and management of the assembly through intimidation is over.” 

Rasul Bakhsh Rais, a professor of political science at LUMS, admitted that the opposition had succeeded in destabilizing the government through the Senate seat victory in Islamabad, though he added that such political setbacks were part of the democratic process. 

“It is a daring decision on part of the prime minister to seek vote of confidence from parliament, but it may lead to another setback if he fails to get the required number of votes,” he told Arab News.


Pakistan, 21 other countries condemn Israeli West Bank measures, warn of ‘de facto annexation’

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan, 21 other countries condemn Israeli West Bank measures, warn of ‘de facto annexation’

  • Joint statement says settlement expansion violates international law, cites UN resolutions, ICJ advisory opinion
  • Signatories include European and Latin American nations such as France and Brazil , alongside Muslim countries

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and 21 other countries, including France, Brazil, Spain and Denmark, on Tuesday condemned sweeping Israeli measures to expand control over the occupied West Bank, warning the steps risk advancing “unacceptable de facto annexation” and undermining prospects for a two-state solution.

In a joint statement issued by the foreign ministers of countries from the Middle East, Europe and Latin America, as well as the secretaries general of the League of Arab States and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the signatories urged Israel to immediately reverse recent decisions reclassifying Palestinian land and accelerating settlement activity.

The statement marks a broadening of international criticism beyond Muslim-majority states that have long denounced Israeli settlement expansion, bringing together countries like Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Finland, Iceland, Ireland and Luxembourg alongside Arab and other Muslim-majority nations.

“Israel’s illegal settlements, and decisions designed to further them, are a flagrant violation of international law, including previous United Nations Security Council Resolutions and the 2024 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice,” the ministers said.

They added the measures were “part of a clear trajectory that aims to change the reality on the ground and to advance unacceptable de facto annexation,” warning that they undermine ongoing efforts for regional peace and stability, including a proposed 20-Point Plan for Gaza, and threaten prospects for broader regional integration.

The ministers called on Israel “to reverse them immediately, to respect its international obligations, and to refrain from actions that would result in permanent changes to the legal and administrative status of the occupied Palestinian Territory.”

The latest statement follows mounting concern over Israel’s land and settlement policies in the West Bank.

Last week, Pakistan and seven other Muslim nations condemned Israel’s decision to approve land registration procedures in parts of the West Bank for the first time since 1967, a move widely seen as easing the path for settlement expansion and potential annexation.

Members of the Israeli cabinet have backed measures to tighten administrative control over areas of the West Bank, including Area C, which makes up around 60 percent of the territory and remains under full Israeli security and administrative control under the Oslo accords.

More than 500,000 Israeli settlers live in settlements and outposts in the West Bank, excluding Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem, alongside around three million Palestinians.

Settlements are considered illegal under international law, a position Israel disputes.

In the latest statement, the foreign ministers reiterated their rejection of “all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem,” and said they oppose “any form of annexation.”

“In view of the alarming escalation in the West Bank, we also call on Israel to put an end to settler violence against Palestinians, including by holding those responsible accountable,” they added.

The ministers pledged to take “concrete steps, in accordance with international law,” to counter the expansion of illegal settlements and policies or threats of forcible displacement and annexation.

Highlighting sensitivities around Jerusalem during Ramadan, they stressed the importance of preserving the historic and legal status quo at the city’s holy sites, recognizing the special role of the Hashemite custodianship of Jordan.

Reaffirming support for a negotiated settlement, the signatories said they remain committed to achieving “a just, comprehensive and lasting peace” on the basis of a two-state solution, in line with the Arab Peace Initiative and relevant UN resolutions, based on the June 4, 1967 lines.

“As reflected in the New York Declaration, the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is imperative for regional peace, stability and integration,” the statement said, adding that only the realization of an independent, sovereign and democratic Palestinian state would allow coexistence among the region’s peoples and states.