German doctor who served in Pakistan for decades receives highest award

German Ambassador to Pakistan Bernhard Schlagheck presented the German “Order of Merit” to Dr Chris Schmotzer in Islamabad on December 17, 2020. (Photo Courtesy – German Embassy)
Short Url
Updated 20 December 2020
Follow

German doctor who served in Pakistan for decades receives highest award

  • Dr. Chris Schmotzer, lovingly called “the German sister” has served in Pakistan for 33 years
  • She is director of the Rawalpindi Leprosy Hospital

Islamabad: German doctor Chris Schmotzer, who devoted her life to the service of humanity in Pakistan and worked tirelessly in the country for over 30 years, received the German “Order of Merit” earlier this week, the German Embassy in Pakistan said. 
German Ambassador to Pakistan, Bernhard Schlagheck, awarded Dr. Chris Schmotzer the honor in Islamabad.
Pakistan’s health chief Dr. Faisal Sultan also attended the ceremony and commended the work of Dr. Schmotzer and her team.




CaptionDr. Faisal Sultan, special assistant to the prime minister on health (left) attended the award ceremony for Dr Chris Schmotzer at the German Embassy in Islamabad on December 17, 2020. (Photo Courtesy – German Embassy) 

“The honor is the highest tribute the Federal Republic of Germany can pay to individuals for outstanding services,” the embassy said in a statement. 
A member of the German Protestant Sisterhood of Christ-Bearers, the “German sister” as she is called lovingly by her Pakistani patients, decided to come to Pakistan shortly after finishing her medical studies in 1988. 
“Dr. Chris Schmotzer was bestowed the Cross of Merit for her tireless service to humanity. As director of the Rawalpindi Leprosy Hospital, she has been serving the people of Pakistan for 33 years now, offering treatment to patients with leprosy, tuberculosis, eye and skin diseases as well as rehabilitation measures,” the statement said. 
Since her arrival in Pakistan, Dr. Schmotzer has contributed to fight leprosy and tuberculosis. She also closely collaborated with Dr. Ruth Pfau and the Marie Adelaide Leprosy Center in Karachi. 
Ambassador Schlagheck said Dr. Schmotzer was a “role model of true philanthropy.”
“Thirty-three years ago, as a young woman, she decided to devote her life to the service of humanity. In Rawalpindi and beyond, she is widely known and respected as a compassionate and devoted medical doctor who always gives priority to the treatment of sick and needy people.” 
The Order of Merit, instituted in 1951, is awarded to German and foreign citizens for achievements in the political, economic, social or intellectual realm and for all kinds of outstanding services to the nation in the field of social, charitable or philanthropic work. The award is not associated with any financial allowance.
Rawalpindi Leprosy Hospital is the base and referral hospital for leprosy in the Northern half of Pakistan. It has 97 beds, around 100 employees and offers all diagnostic and treatment facilities.
In 2017, German doctor Ruth Pfau who dedicated her life to eradicating leprosy in Pakistan, died in Karachi at age 87.


Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

Updated 57 min 11 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

  • Top court orders lower court to pause proceedings after lawyers allege due-process breaches
  • Mazari-Hazir, husband face charges under cybercrime law that carry up to 14 years in prison

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Thursday halted the cybercrime trial of prominent human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after their lawyers argued that a lower court had recorded witness testimony in their absence, violating due-process rules.

Mazari-Hazir, one of Pakistan’s most outspoken civil liberties lawyers, and Chattha are being prosecuted under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) over posts on X that authorities say incited ethnic divisions and portrayed the military as involved in “terrorism.” Both reject the allegations. If convicted under the relevant PECA provision, they face a prison term of up to 14 years.

The case has drawn broad attention in Pakistan’s legal community because Mazari-Hazir, who has been repeatedly detained over her criticism of the security establishment, argues that the trial court ignored basic procedural guarantees despite her medical leave request. The case also comes as Pakistan faces sustained scrutiny over the use of PECA against activists, journalists and political dissenters, with lawyers arguing that lower courts often move ahead without meeting minimum fair-trial standards.

The couple’s lawyer, Riasat Ali Azad, said his clients filed a petition in the Supreme Court because the lower court had moved ahead improperly.

“Today, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has stayed the lower court proceedings, the trial court proceedings and has said that the [Islamabad] High Court should decide our pending revision petition for which a date has already been fixed,” he told reporters.

Azad said the violation was clear under Pakistan’s Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires evidence to be recorded in the presence of the accused.

“Yet, on that very day, evidence of four witnesses was recorded in their absence, and a state counsel was appointed to conduct cross-examination on their behalf,” he said. “All these things are against the right to a fair trial under Articles 10 and 10-A.”

A three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar ordered the trial court to pause proceedings and instructed the Islamabad High Court to hear the couple’s pending criminal revision petition first.

The trial had been scheduled to resume on Dec.15, but the Supreme Court’s stay now freezes proceedings before both the additional sessions judge and the special PECA court. 

The Islamabad High Court is expected to hear the criminal revision petition next week.

Chattha, who is also a lawyer, said the SC ruling underscored the need for procedural safeguards.

“It is a victory for the constitution and the law,” he said, arguing that the trial court had ignored their request to re-record witness statements in their presence.