Premier League denies rejecting Saudi-led bid to buy Newcastle United

Newcastle United's English striker Dwight Gayle (C) celebrates with teammates after scoring a goal during the English Premier League football match between Newcastle United and Liverpool at St James' Park in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, north east England on July 26, 2020. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 10 September 2020
Follow

Premier League denies rejecting Saudi-led bid to buy Newcastle United

  • English top flight’s governing body responds to club claims that takeover had been blocked 
  • Early this year, the Kingdom was asked for and gave legal assurances from the highest level that the PIF was an independent body

DUBAI: The door remains open for a £300m ($384 million) Saudi-led takeover of Newcastle United Football Club, after the Premier League, the governing body of top-flight English soccer, denied that the bid had been rejected.

The denial came the day after the club claimed the deal had not been approved, and hinted that legal action might be taken to force it through.

In response, the League said on Thursday: “The club’s assertion that the Premier League has rejected the takeover is incorrect. The Premier League has, on a number of occasions, given its opinion about which entities it believes would have control over the club should the consortium proceed with the acquisition. That opinion is based on legal advice.

“That means the takeover could proceed to the next stage, should the relevant parties provide all appropriate information. They would then be subject to a suitability assessment by the board (of the Premier League). As an alternative, the board has repeatedly offered arbitration as a way forward since June.”

The events of the past two days have added to the confusion surrounding the controversial takeover bid — which was contractually agreed in April but has been held up since then by the need for the League’s approval — but the response by soccer chiefs means that it remains a possibility.

On Wednesday the club, owned by entrepreneur Mike Ashley, issued a statement in which it said: “Newcastle United can confirm that the Premier League has rejected a takeover bid made by PCP Capital Partners, the Reuben Brothers and the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia (PIF) based on its owners and directors test.

“This conclusion has been reached despite the club providing the Premier League with overwhelming evidence and legal opinions that PIF is independent and autonomous of the Saudi Arabian government.”

Early this year, the Kingdom was asked for, and provided, legal assurances at the highest level that the PIF is an independent body.

“The club and its owners do not accept that Premier League Chief Executive Richard Masters and the Premier League have acted appropriately in relation to this matter, and will be considering all relevant options available to them,” the statement continued.

“Mike Ashley understands fans’ frustrations and would like to reassure them that he has been fully committed to ensuring this takeover process reached completion, as he felt it was in the best interests of the club.”

The Premier League said it was “disappointed and surprised” by the club’s claims, and in particular for singling out Masters as having behaved inappropriately.

The PIF and other members of the consortium are believed to be frustrated by the lack of progress in their takeover bid. They formally withdrew their offer at the end of July but have made no secret of their desire to proceed with the purchase of the club, subject to Premier League approval.

A person familiar with the consortium said its members were surprised by the club’s statement, about which they were not consulted, and were unaware of any change in the Premier League’s stance. As far as they are aware, there has been no change since July, when the Premier League asked the consortium to agree to binding arbitration talks in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.

The English football season kicks off this weekend.


Pakistan bowler Tariq and his unusual delivery courts controversy at the T20 World Cup

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan bowler Tariq and his unusual delivery courts controversy at the T20 World Cup

  • Offspinner’s unconventional bowling action has already mesmerized some of the big names
  • As is often the case in cricket, the reasons for Usman Tariq’s potential illegal delivery are complicated
ISLAMABAD: With a momentary pause in his delivery and his statue-like pose at the crease, Pakistan spin bowler Usman Tariq has created plenty of attention at cricket’s Twenty20 World Cup.
Just enough, it seems, to throw off opposing batters.
With it has come a fair share of controversy — that his pause-and sling style of bowling is an illegal delivery, or in cricket parlance, chucking. He’s already been reported twice, but cleared, by Pakistani cricket authorities.
The 28-year-old offspinner’s unconventional bowling action has already mesmerized some of the big names in shortest format of the game and has seen him taking three wickets against an inexperienced United States in Sri Lanka this week in what was his first T20 World Cup game.
As is often the case in cricket, the reasons for Tariq’s potential illegal delivery are complicated.
First there is the so-called “15-degree debate” — that bowlers cannot exceed the ICC’s 15-degree elbow flex limit, which is nearly impossible for on-field umpires to judge accurately in real time.
Another talking point has been the pause in Tariq’s delivery stride. Some critics, including former India cricketer Shreevats Goswami, compare it to a football penalty run-up that would be ruled illegal if the shooter stops midway.
Baffling the batters
Batters like Cameron Green of Australia and South African Dewald Brevis are a few notable players that were flummoxed by Tariq’s bowling action.
Power-hitter Brevis fell to Tariq’s only second ball in T20 international cricket in November. Green shook his head in disbelief and mocked Tariq’s bowling action close to the boundary line — but later apologized — when he walked back after slicing a wide delivery straight to the cover fielder during Pakistan’s 3-0 sweep of Australia at Lahore.
Tariq’s rise in T20 cricket has also seen him taking a hat-trick at Rawalpindi when he took 4-18 against Zimbabwe during the tri-series in November. He has taken 11 wickets off his 88 balls in only four T20 internationals.
It was no surprise when selectors included Tariq in the 15-man T20 World Cup squad, knowing that pitches in Sri Lanka would suit slow bowlers more than pacemen.
Tariq’s journey to top-level cricket wasn’t a smooth one. He was twice reported for suspect bowling action during country’s premier domestic T20 tournament — the Pakistan Super League — over the last two seasons, but on both occasions he was cleared after testing at the National Cricket Academy in Lahore.
“I have two elbows in my arm,” Tariq said. “My arm bends naturally. I have got this tested and cleared. Everyone feels I bend my arm and all that. My bent arm is a biological issue.”
Tariq has also featured in the Caribbean Premier League and with his deceptive bowling action he was the tournament’s second-highest wicket taker for champions Trinbago Knight Riders.
Long pause a problem
“The batters are struggling to read Tariq because of the long pause the moment he steps on the bowling crease,” former Pakistan captain Sarfaraz Ahmed, who has played with Tariq in the PSL’s Quetta Gladiators, said.
“The long pause disturbs all the concentration of batters and when he bowls a fastish (delivery, after a long pause), or even a slow ball, it leaves the batters clueless.”
Less than three months ago, Tariq said he had dreamed about playing against archrival India. And after Pakistan withdrew its boycott of Sunday’s game in the T20 World Cup, Tariq’s dream could come true if Pakistan uses five spinners against India.
“I wish there’s a match against India and I can win the game for Pakistan single-handedly,” Tariq said then. “My coaches have injected this thing in me that ‘you have to win matches single-handedly’.”
On Sunday against India, Tariq could do just that.