Investigation report calls deadly 2012 Pakistani factory fire ‘planned sabotage’

A firetruck stands outside the Baldia Town textile factory where a fire killed 259 people in Karachi, Pakistan, on September 11, 2012. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 07 July 2020
Follow

Investigation report calls deadly 2012 Pakistani factory fire ‘planned sabotage’

  • At least 259 died in a fire at a textile factory in Karachi’s industrial suburb of Baldia Town in September 2012 
  • Investigation report holds members of the MQM party responsible the fire over factory owners’ refusal to pay extortion money 

ISLAMABAD: An investigation report into a 2012 fire at a factory in Pakistan’s teeming commercial capital of Karachi called the incident “planned sabotage” over owners refusing to pay extortion money and share profits with members of a powerful political party.

Fire ravaged a cramped textile factory in Karachi’s industrial suburb of Baldia Town in September 2012, killing 259 workers trapped behind locked doors. Officials called it Pakistan’s worst industrial accident, which came just hours after another fire at a shoe factory in the eastern city of Lahore killed at least 25.

“That factory fire was a ‘planned sabotage/terrorist activity’ and ‘not an accidental fire’ carried out due to refusal to pay extortion (Bhatta) of Rs.20 (Twenty) Crores and partnership in factory profits by factory owners to office bearers namely Rehman Bhola and Hammad Siddiqui of MQM-A,” the investigation report, made public on Monday, said, referring to the Muttahida Qaumi Movement party of Altaf Hussain, Karachi’s most powerful and, until recently, untouchable political leader.

Initial investigations into the fire had determined that the death toll greatly increased because of illegal practices at the factory, reviving concerns about the regulation of Pakistan’s manufacturing sector, which is centered in Karachi.

But the investigation report by the joint investigation team has said it believed, unanimously, that the incident was not an accidental one, recommending that police file terrorism cases against Rehman Bhola, Hammad Siddiqui, Zubair Charia, Omer Hassan Qadri, Dr. Abdul Sattar, Ali Hassan Qadri, Iqbal Adeeb Khanum and four other unknown associates.

The MQM has not commented on the investigation report so far.


Pakistan’s deputy PM says country will not send forces to Gaza to disarm Hamas

Updated 27 December 2025
Follow

Pakistan’s deputy PM says country will not send forces to Gaza to disarm Hamas

  • Ishaq Dar says Pakistan open to peacekeeping but Gaza’s internal security is Palestinian responsibility
  • Pakistan’s top religious clerics from different schools have warned against sending forces to Palestine

ISLAMABAD: Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar said on Saturday Pakistan was willing to contribute to an international peacekeeping force in Gaza, though it would not deploy troops to disarm or de-weaponize Hamas.

The statement follows media reports saying Washington views Pakistan as a potentially significant contributor given its battle-hardened military and wants it to be part of International Stabilization Force (ISF), which is part of United States President Donald Trump’s 20-point framework for a Gaza peace plan.

The plan announced by Trump at the White House on September 29 was formally adopted at the Sharm El-Sheikh Peace Summit in October. Co-chaired by Trump and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, the summit brought together leaders from 27 countries to sign the “Trump Declaration for Enduring Peace and Prosperity.”

Deployment of troops from Muslim-majority countries during a transitional stabilization phase is a key part of the plan before the war-ravaged Palestinian territory moves toward reconstruction and a longer-term political settlement.

“If they say that we should go and start fighting, disarm Hamas, de-weaponize them, and go and destroy the tunnels that Hamas has built until now, that is not our job,” Dar, who is also the country’s foreign minister, told reporters during a year-end briefing in Islamabad.

He emphasized there was clarity between Pakistan’s civil and military leadership over the matter.

“We have a very complete understanding on this matter that we cannot do that kind of work,” he added.

The deputy prime minister said Pakistan had been using the term “peacekeeping” and had never used the phrase “peace enforcement” while discussing the force.

“I have been very clear: Pakistan will be happy to join if the mandate is not peace enforcement and disarming and de-weaponizing Hamas.”

The government’s stance comes amid growing domestic pressure over the issue.

On Monday, a group of Pakistan’s top religious leaders, chaired by prominent scholar Mufti Taqi Usmani, warned the government against yielding to what they described as international pressure to send forces to Gaza.

In a joint statement from Karachi, the clerics — representing Deobandi, Barelvi, Ahl-e-Hadees and Shia schools of thought — said that Washington wanted Muslim countries to send their forces to Gaza to disarm Hamas.

“Several Muslim governments have already refused this, and pressure is being increased on Pakistan,” it added.

Addressing such concerns, Dar said Pakistan would not land its forces in Palestine to “fight Muslims.”

Israel has repeatedly called for the disarmament of Hamas as a precondition for any long-term settlement, and the United Nations Security Council has also endorsed the ISF framework in November.

However, Dar maintained during the media briefing the internal security of Gaza was the Palestinian responsibility.

“The Palestinian Authority, their government, it is their job, it is the job of their law enforcement agency,” he said

The deputy prime minister also highlighted Pakistan’s involvement in the “Arab Islamic Group of Eight,” including Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Turkiye and Indonesia, which has been coordinating on the crisis.

He said the efforts of these countries had brought some peace to Palestine and reduced bloodshed.

“Our declared policy is that there should be an independent two-state solution,” he continued while calling for pre-1967 borders.