ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan said on Tuesday that the country will raise its voice on all international forums, including the United Nations Security Council and International Criminal Court, challenging India’s recent actions against Kashmir.
Addressing the joint session of the Parliament, Khan said that he feared India may resort to “ethnic cleansing” in disputed Kashmir valley following revocation of its special status.
He said the move, which was a violation of the Indian constitution itself, was in line with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “racist ideology” that would have “global repercussions.”
“The Indian government violated its own constitution to promote its ideology and scrapped occupied Kashmir’s special status,” said Khan.
He added that Islamabad wanted better relations with its neighbors but Pakistan army would respond to any aggression from India’s side.
He said that Pakistan had strongly conveyed to India that it was not involved in Pulwama attack and would never let its soil be used for terrorist activities but Modi government built on “war hysteria” to win the elections at home encashing anti-Pakistan sentiment.
Khan said that India was all out to crush the freedom struggle in Kashmir with force and had turned the valley into a graveyard.
Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi, who was leading the country’s delegation at the OIC meeting on Jammu and Kashmir hosted in Jeddah today, told Arab News that “Pakistan will use all diplomatic, legal and political options against the unilateral and unjust Indian decision of revoking special constitutional status of Indian occupied Kashmir.”
He said that the entire Kashmiri diaspora is in a state of sheer anguish. “The world did not only condemn the ruthlessly imposed decision by India on Kashmiri people but it rejected it out-rightly,” he added.
A day after the implementation of a special decree that aims to change the disputed region’s Muslim-majority demographics, the Kashmir issue has emerged as a major flashpoint for the international community. The restive valley remained under a complete lockdown with huge presence of security forces and blackout through phone and Internet service suspension.
Qureshi said, “Today, the whole world is questioning India’s credibility.”
To substantiate his point, he referred to voices raised from inside India against this move. “Indian legal experts, themselves, are saying the decision is unlawful and can be a big challenge for its government. It will create chaos within India.”
He said that Pakistan had already initiated efforts to lobby world powers. “Pakistan has not only taken up the issue with United States but also has started using its diplomatic contacts with China, Russia and other Powers of the world.”
He said an American delegation headed by US Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs, Alice Wells, is already in Pakistan and that the foreign office has taken up the issue with the US delegation.
He said that US President Trump already offered to mediate on Kashmir dispute between Pakistan and India which India unfortunately rejected.
“Now, Pakistan will use United Nations Security Council as well as other humanitarian and legal ways to take up the volatile issue of Kashmir to save the Kashmiri brothers,” Qureshi added. “Our legal experts are looking into all the possible dimensions to use the International Court of Justice or other legal platforms,” he said.
Qureshi highlighted that India played a “spoiler” just when the Afghan peace process was making a smooth headway, which will likely put the crucial phase of reaching the Afghan peace deal “on back-burner.” He said, “Russia, China, Central Asia, and Pakistan all had the shared objective of peace and prosperity in Afghanistan.”
Pakistan’s former foreign secretary and envoy to India, Salman Bashir termed India’s decision a “big mistake.”
“Pakistan has many forums to take up the recent unacceptable, illegal decision about Indian-administered Kashmir. Foreign minister has already written a letter to the UNSC in which the Indian barbarism and brutalities are mentioned. The demographic changes which India is trying to bring through this move are also mentioned.”
Bashir added that “Pakistan can also take this matter up with the International Committee of Red Cross in Geneva as it is a case of armed occupation of a territory.”
But Pakistan’s former attorney general and an international law expert, Ashtar Ausaf Ali, told Arab News that Pakistan cannot move the ICJ in this case as it does not involve violation of a treaty. It was a bilateral agreement and the ICJ is not the right forum for this case, he said.
“The presidential decree is not the way to bring in a change so it can be challenged in any Indian court including their Supreme Court,” said Ali.
Pakistan warns Indian move on Kashmir will have 'global repercussions'
Pakistan warns Indian move on Kashmir will have 'global repercussions'
- Islamabad will move international and humanitarian forums seeking help for Kashmiri people
- India may resort to "ethnic cleansing" in disputed Kashmir, PM Khan says
Sindh assembly passes resolution rejecting move to separate Karachi
- Chief Minister Shah cites constitutional safeguards against altering provincial boundaries
- Calls to separate Karachi intensified amid governance concerns after a mall fire last month
ISLAMABAD: The provincial assembly of Pakistan’s southern Sindh province on Saturday passed a resolution rejecting any move to separate Karachi, declaring its territorial integrity “non-negotiable” amid political calls to carve the city out as a separate administrative unit.
The resolution comes after fresh demands by the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) and other voices to grant Karachi provincial or federal status following governance challenges highlighted by the deadly Gul Plaza fire earlier this year that killed 80 people.
Karachi, Pakistan’s largest and most densely populated city, is the country’s main commercial hub and contributes a significant share to the national economy.
Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah tabled the resolution in the assembly, condemning what he described as “divisive statements” about breaking up Sindh or detaching Karachi.
“The province that played a foundational role in the creation of Pakistan cannot allow the fragmentation of its own historic homeland,” Shah told lawmakers, adding that any attempt to divide Sindh or separate Karachi was contrary to the constitution and democratic norms.
Citing Article 239 of Pakistan’s 1973 Constitution, which requires the consent of not less than two-thirds of a provincial assembly to alter provincial boundaries, Shah said any such move could not proceed without the assembly’s approval.
“If any such move is attempted, it is this Assembly — by a two-thirds majority — that will decide,” he said.
The resolution reaffirmed that Karachi would “forever remain” an integral part of Sindh and directed the provincial government to forward the motion to the president, prime minister and parliamentary leadership for record.
Shah said the resolution was not aimed at anyone but referred to the shifting stance of MQM in the debate while warning that opposing the resolution would amount to supporting the division of Sindh.
The party has been a major political force in Karachi with a significant vote bank in the city and has frequently criticized Shah’s provincial administration over its governance of Pakistan’s largest metropolis.
Taha Ahmed Khan, a senior MQM leader, acknowledged that his party had “presented its demand openly on television channels with clear and logical arguments” to separate Karachi from Sindh.
“It is a purely constitutional debate,” he told Arab News by phone. “We are aware that the Pakistan Peoples Party, which rules the province, holds a two-thirds majority and that a new province cannot be created at this stage. But that does not mean new provinces can never be formed.”
Calls to alter Karachi’s status have periodically surfaced amid longstanding complaints over governance, infrastructure and administrative control in the megacity, though no formal proposal to redraw provincial boundaries has been introduced at the federal level.










