Taliban warned against peace deal without Kabul’s consent

The Afghan conflict has seen thousands of civilian and military deaths. (Reuters)
Updated 09 February 2019
Follow

Taliban warned against peace deal without Kabul’s consent

  • President Ghani has insisted that the peace process must be Afghan-led and Afghan-owned
  • The Taliban has said it will hold talks with the government once the US fulfills its promise to withdraw troops from the country

KABUL: There can be no peace deal for Afghanistan without Kabul’s consent, a spokesman for President Ashraf Ghani told Arab News on Saturday, as talks continued between the US and the Taliban to end the years-long war.

Harun Chakhansur said the government was willing to negotiate with the armed group, which has refused to engage directly with Kabul and calls Ghani’s administration a puppet of the West.

Ghani has insisted that the peace process must be Afghan-led and Afghan-owned, but his officials have been excluded from key meetings in Doha and Moscow.

“The government of Afghanistan is ready at any moment to engage in negotiations and strike a peace deal with the Taliban based on our constitutional framework and the road map presented by the president,” Chakhansur told Arab News, adding that the sooner a peace deal was agreed upon, the better it would be for the nation.

“Nothing regarding the peace process is executable unless agreed upon with the Afghan government. All prospects that lead to sustainable and lasting peace is the goal. Any possibility that undermines the main objective of sustainable peace will not be acceptable by the people and government of Afghanistan.

“But on the Taliban side there are some sticking points that need to be addressed ... if they are sincere about peace negotiations. Hurdles could only be discovered during the direct negotiation process between the Afghan government and Taliban.”

A Taliban spokesman said the group refused to comment on the matter when contacted by Arab News. 

The Taliban has said it will hold talks with the government once the US fulfills its promise to withdraw troops from the country. 

US Special Envoy for Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad and Taliban representatives are expected to meet for further talks in Doha on Feb. 25.

The planned meeting follows last week’s talks between the Taliban and Afghan delegates in Moscow, where the two sides agreed on a total pullout of foreign forces from the country.

On Friday, Khalilzad said Washington hoped to reach a peace agreement with the insurgents before the Afghan elections in July. The already-delayed polls would be held as scheduled if the talks failed to make any headway, he added. 

There is speculation that, instead of the polls going ahead, an interim government will be formed with the Taliban’s participation. Ghani, who is standing for re-election, has objected to the the idea.

US President Donald Trump has not hidden his impatience to withdraw troops from Afghanistan and bring the costly war to an end. 

Washington has also sought assurances that Afghanistan will not be used as a base by terrorists to carry out attacks. 

 

No obstacle

Waheed Mozhdah, an analyst familiar with the workings of Taliban leaders and who was at the Moscow meeting, said the insurgents and Khalilzad may strike a peace deal in Doha on Feb. 25.

“The Taliban told me (in Moscow) they have no obstacle and that America has accepted their main demand, which is the pullout of the troops,” he told Arab News.

He said all participants at the Moscow meeting believed there would be no elections in July and that Ghani would have to give up his seat.

“Those who have earned wealth and power fear the repercussion of any peace deal. They fear the Taliban may go after them,” the analyst said. 

“At the Moscow meeting the Taliban clearly told the commanders and leaders that ‘we have to forget the past and move forward because we can’t wash blood with blood’,” Mozdah pointed out.

Another analyst, Harris Wadan, explained why there were doubts over the election and Ghani’s future. 

“One big perceived result after … Khalilzad’s talks with the Taliban was that Ghani has to go and the election is a distant event that might not happen, an interim government instead might be formed,” he told Arab News via email.

“The Afghan government’s role has shrunk, hence the future set-up (elections) will not be a priority and Trump has downgraded the role of Afghan government to stakeholder.” 


Ex-Syrian intelligence officer appears in UK court charged with crimes against humanity

Updated 58 min ago
Follow

Ex-Syrian intelligence officer appears in UK court charged with crimes against humanity

LONDON: A former member ‌of Syria's Air Force Intelligence attended a British court hearing via videolink on Tuesday charged with crimes against humanity and torture relating to the suppression of pro-democracy demonstrations ​in Damascus in 2011.
Salem Michel Al-Salem, 58, who now lives in Britain, appeared virtually at the hearing at London's Westminster Magistrates' Court from his home. He was wearing a breathing apparatus mask and the court was told he suffered from degenerative motor neurone disease.
Al-Salem is charged with three counts of murder as a crime against humanity relating to deaths in April and July 2011 "as part of ‌a widespread or ‌systematic attack against a civilian population with ​knowledge ‌of ⁠the attack".
He ​is ⁠also accused of three charges of torture relating to incidents in 2011 and 2012, and one of conduct ancillary to murder as a crime against humanity. He did not speak during the hearing and there was no indication as to how he would plead.
His lawyer Sean Caulfield told the court that Al-Salem was too unwell to confirm his ⁠name.
The seven charges were brought under a British ‌law that allows the prosecution of serious ‌international crimes committed abroad. The Crown Prosecution ​Service said it was the ‌first time it had brought charges of murder as crimes against ‌humanity.
In 2005, Afghan warlord Faryadi Zardad was convicted by a British court of torture that had taken place in Afghanistan.
Al-Salem, who has sought indefinite leave to remain in Britain, was a colonel in the Syrian Air Force ‌Intelligence department with oversight of the Information Branch in the district of Jobar, to the east of ⁠central Damascus, British prosecutors ⁠say.
He is accused of leading a group tasked with quelling the demonstrations, which mostly occurred during Friday afternoon prayers. Prosecutors say he gave his men orders to open fire on protesters, which led to the deaths of some individuals.
Prosecutors say he was also present at, or took part in, the torture of men at the Information Branch building.
Al-Salem was first arrested in central England in December 2021. His lawyer had sought an order to withhold his name, arguing it could pose a risk to his safety. England's ​Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring rejected the ​application but ordered that his address not be made public.
He will next appear on Friday at London's Old Bailey court.