US blacklisting of Pakistan 'politically motivated,' says government

Pakistani Christian girls look on from a roadside shop in a Christian colony in Islamabad on Dec. 12, 2018. The United States on December 12 added Pakistan to its blacklist of countries that violate religious freedom, ramping up pressure over the uneasy ally's treatment of minorities. (AFP)
Updated 12 December 2018
Follow

US blacklisting of Pakistan 'politically motivated,' says government

  • US exempts Pakistan from sanctions carried by the listing
  • Downgradation a 'political tactic' to pressure Pakistan to mitigate US failures in Afghanistan, Pakistan Human Rights Minister

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan rejected on Wednesday its placement on a US blacklist that includes countries accused of violating religious freedom, with its Ministry of Foreign Affairs describing Washington’s decision as “politically motivated.”

Pakistan was designated among a number of “countries of particular concern” in an annual congressional report, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on Tuesday. However, the penalties carried by the listing have been waived.

The Trump administration’s decision gives Washington leverage to apply pressure on Islamabad to end any discrimination on the basis of religion, said Dr. Hasan Askari-Rizvi, a geopolitical expert, while talking to Arab News, though he also pointed out the decision was primarily taken to put Pakistan under pressure and seek its cooperation in Afghanistan.

“They could have announced a waiver while downgrading Pakistan’s ranking, condemning the country for its treatment of minorities, but, instead, they waited to give the country a jolt.” It’s a tactic to “apply pressure, though not to the extent where the total relationship breaks down,” Rizvi added.

Earlier this year, Pompeo had put America’s estranged South Asian ally on a “special watch list for severe violations of religious freedom,” which constituted a step toward its placement on the blacklist.

Discussing the recent development with Arab News, a US Embassy spokesperson said, “Secretary Pompeo determined that the government of Pakistan had engaged in and tolerated ‘systematic, ongoing, and egregious violations of religious freedom,’” though it was determined in certain instances “that a waiver of the Presidential Action was required in the important national interest of the United States.”

The spokesperson added: “Among our key concerns are the continued use and abuse of blasphemy laws, as well as widespread abuses committed against the Ahmadiyya Muslim community and other religious minorities.”

However, Pakistan’s government functionaries have taken a different view of the situation. Earlier in the day, Human Rights Minister, Dr. Shireen Mazari, issued a statement, saying: “It was apparent that the US was using this as a brazen political tactic to pressure Pakistan to mitigate US failures in Afghanistan,” adding that “the timing of this move reflects this most clearly.”

Mazari said that targeting Pakistan while deliberately ignoring “India’s shrinking space for its religious minorities is absurd and unacceptable.”

Questioning the credentials and impartiality of the self-proclaimed jury involved in preparation of the blacklist, the foreign office said that Pakistan ensured “equal treatment for minorities.”

“Around 4 percent of our total population comprises of citizens belonging to Christian, Hindu, Buddhists and Sikh faiths” and “their enjoyment of human rights without any discrimination is the cardinal principle of the Constitution of Pakistan.”

However, Amir Rana, director of the Pak Institute for Peace Studies, argued that the US designation could negatively impact Pakistan’s image globally.

“If you look into the data of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, the atrocities against minorities have gone up compared to last year. Then the rise of TLP (Tehreek-e-Labbaik) threatened the religious freedom of some of these minorities,” Rana told Arab News.

Yet, the US decision to put Pakistan on the blacklist follows October’s landmark acquittal of Aasia Bibi, a Christian woman who remained on the death row for about eight years on blasphemy charges, by the Supreme Court of Pakistan. The top leaders of a political faction that violently reacted to the apex court’s verdict and instigated people against state functionaries and institutions were also apprehended by law enforcement agencies and slapped with terrorism and sedition charges.

Islamabad has also reaffirmed its commitment to work “with the international community to ensure that internationally agreed standards on religious freedom are observed in Pakistan and the broader region.”

Analyst and legal expert, Feisal Naqvi, who has worked on minority rights cases, explained that Pakistan already had ample laws to protect religious freedom for minorities.

“The only question is that of the implementation and enforcement” of those protection laws. He said that in recent years, public awareness of minority rights “has increased tremendously” and subsequently “protection will also increase.”


Islamabad court sentences seven individuals to life imprisonment over ‘digital terrorism’

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Islamabad court sentences seven individuals to life imprisonment over ‘digital terrorism’

  • The convicts include Wajahat Saeed Khan, Shaheen Sahbahi, Haider Raza Mehdi, Adil Raja, Moeed Peerzada, Akbar Hussain and Sabir Shakir
  • The cases against them relate to May 9, 2023 riots over ex-PM Imran Khan’s arrest that saw vandalization of government, military installations

ISLAMABAD: An Islamabad anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Friday awarded two life sentences each to seven individuals, including journalists and YouTubers, over “digital terrorism,” in connection with May 9, 2023 riot cases.

The court sentenced Wajahat Saeed Khan, Shaheen Sahbahi, Haider Raza Mehdi, Adil Raja, Moeed Peerzada, Akbar Hussain and Sabir Shakir under various sections of the Anti-Terrorism Act and the Pakistan Penal Code.

The riots had erupted after former prime minister Imran Khan was briefly arrested in Islamabad on corruption charges on May 9, 2023, with his supporters attacking government buildings and military installations in several cities.

ATC judge Tahir Sipra announced the reserved verdict, following a trial in absentia of the above-mentioned individuals who were accused of “digital terrorism against the state on May 9.”

“The punishment awarded will be subject to the confirmation by Hon’ble Islamabad High Court,” the verdict read, referring to each count of punishment awarded to the convicts.

It also imposed multiple fined on the convicted journalists and YouTubers, who many see as being closed to Khan.

The prosecution presented 24 witnesses, while the court had appointed Gulfam Goraya as the counsel of the accused, most of whom happen to be outside Pakistan.

Pakistan’s anti-terrorism laws allow trials in absentia of the accused persons.

Thousands of supporters of Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party were detained in the days that followed the May 2023 riots and hundreds were charged under anti-terrorism laws in a sweeping crackdown, with several cases transferred to military courts.

The government of PM Shehbaz Sharif accuses Khan’s party of staging violent protests in a bid to incite mutiny in the armed forces and to derail democracy in the country. The PTI denies inciting supporters to violence and says the government used the May 2023 protests as a pretext to victimize the party, a claim denied by the government.

The May 2023 riots took place a little over a year after Khan fell out with Pakistan’s powerful military, blaming the institution for colluding with his rivals to oust him from office in a parliamentary no-trust vote, a charge denied by the military.

Khan, who has been jailed since Aug. 2023 on a slew of charges, has led a campaign of unprecedented defiance against the country’s powerful military. He also accuses the then generals of rigging the Feb. 8, 2024 election in collusion with the election commission and his political rivals to keep him from returning to power. The military, election commission and Khan’s rivals deny the allegation.