US blacklisting of Pakistan 'politically motivated,' says government

Pakistani Christian girls look on from a roadside shop in a Christian colony in Islamabad on Dec. 12, 2018. The United States on December 12 added Pakistan to its blacklist of countries that violate religious freedom, ramping up pressure over the uneasy ally's treatment of minorities. (AFP)
Updated 12 December 2018
Follow

US blacklisting of Pakistan 'politically motivated,' says government

  • US exempts Pakistan from sanctions carried by the listing
  • Downgradation a 'political tactic' to pressure Pakistan to mitigate US failures in Afghanistan, Pakistan Human Rights Minister

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan rejected on Wednesday its placement on a US blacklist that includes countries accused of violating religious freedom, with its Ministry of Foreign Affairs describing Washington’s decision as “politically motivated.”

Pakistan was designated among a number of “countries of particular concern” in an annual congressional report, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on Tuesday. However, the penalties carried by the listing have been waived.

The Trump administration’s decision gives Washington leverage to apply pressure on Islamabad to end any discrimination on the basis of religion, said Dr. Hasan Askari-Rizvi, a geopolitical expert, while talking to Arab News, though he also pointed out the decision was primarily taken to put Pakistan under pressure and seek its cooperation in Afghanistan.

“They could have announced a waiver while downgrading Pakistan’s ranking, condemning the country for its treatment of minorities, but, instead, they waited to give the country a jolt.” It’s a tactic to “apply pressure, though not to the extent where the total relationship breaks down,” Rizvi added.

Earlier this year, Pompeo had put America’s estranged South Asian ally on a “special watch list for severe violations of religious freedom,” which constituted a step toward its placement on the blacklist.

Discussing the recent development with Arab News, a US Embassy spokesperson said, “Secretary Pompeo determined that the government of Pakistan had engaged in and tolerated ‘systematic, ongoing, and egregious violations of religious freedom,’” though it was determined in certain instances “that a waiver of the Presidential Action was required in the important national interest of the United States.”

The spokesperson added: “Among our key concerns are the continued use and abuse of blasphemy laws, as well as widespread abuses committed against the Ahmadiyya Muslim community and other religious minorities.”

However, Pakistan’s government functionaries have taken a different view of the situation. Earlier in the day, Human Rights Minister, Dr. Shireen Mazari, issued a statement, saying: “It was apparent that the US was using this as a brazen political tactic to pressure Pakistan to mitigate US failures in Afghanistan,” adding that “the timing of this move reflects this most clearly.”

Mazari said that targeting Pakistan while deliberately ignoring “India’s shrinking space for its religious minorities is absurd and unacceptable.”

Questioning the credentials and impartiality of the self-proclaimed jury involved in preparation of the blacklist, the foreign office said that Pakistan ensured “equal treatment for minorities.”

“Around 4 percent of our total population comprises of citizens belonging to Christian, Hindu, Buddhists and Sikh faiths” and “their enjoyment of human rights without any discrimination is the cardinal principle of the Constitution of Pakistan.”

However, Amir Rana, director of the Pak Institute for Peace Studies, argued that the US designation could negatively impact Pakistan’s image globally.

“If you look into the data of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, the atrocities against minorities have gone up compared to last year. Then the rise of TLP (Tehreek-e-Labbaik) threatened the religious freedom of some of these minorities,” Rana told Arab News.

Yet, the US decision to put Pakistan on the blacklist follows October’s landmark acquittal of Aasia Bibi, a Christian woman who remained on the death row for about eight years on blasphemy charges, by the Supreme Court of Pakistan. The top leaders of a political faction that violently reacted to the apex court’s verdict and instigated people against state functionaries and institutions were also apprehended by law enforcement agencies and slapped with terrorism and sedition charges.

Islamabad has also reaffirmed its commitment to work “with the international community to ensure that internationally agreed standards on religious freedom are observed in Pakistan and the broader region.”

Analyst and legal expert, Feisal Naqvi, who has worked on minority rights cases, explained that Pakistan already had ample laws to protect religious freedom for minorities.

“The only question is that of the implementation and enforcement” of those protection laws. He said that in recent years, public awareness of minority rights “has increased tremendously” and subsequently “protection will also increase.”


How political tensions between India, Pakistan might make their way into English cricket

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

How political tensions between India, Pakistan might make their way into English cricket

  • BBC reported last week Indian Premier League-owned franchises in England’s The Hundred will not consider Pakistani players
  • Of 964 total cricketers that have registered for auction in The Hundred, 67 players— 63 men and four women— are from Pakistan

Geopolitical tensions between India and Pakistan might be spilling over into English cricket.

Four of the eight franchises in England’s newest cricket competition — The Hundred — are at least part-owned by Indian investors who also control teams in the Indian Premier League (IPL).

No Pakistan player has featured in the IPL since the Mumbai terror attacks in 2008, and the BBC reported last week that the IPL-owned franchises in The Hundred — Manchester Super Giants, MI London, Southern Brave and Sunrisers Leeds — would not be considering any Pakistan cricketers when the player auction takes place across March 11-12. None of those four teams have officially commented on the BBC report.

Last year, Richard Gould, chief executive of the England and Wales Cricket Board, said the governing body was “aware” of playing restrictions on Pakistani players in the IPL and other cricket leagues where there are Indian investors, but insisted that “won’t be happening” in The Hundred.

The ECB sent an email on Sunday to the eight franchises in The Hundred, reminding them of their responsibilities and warning them that action would be taken if there is any evidence of discrimination, including ignoring players based on nationality.

Britain’s Press Association also reported that if any proof was forthcoming, the matter would likely be referred to the Cricket Regulator — an independent body responsible for monitoring compliance with the game’s regulations — while the ECB may take separate action, too.

The ECB has retained full ownership of the 100-ball competition and its regulations, but has sold stakes in it to big-business investors from India and the United States to generate hundreds of millions of pounds to safeguard the financially stricken domestic game in England.

Of the 964 players up for auction in The Hundred, a total of 67 players — 63 men and four women — are from Pakistan.

There were no Pakistan players selected at last year’s auction — made before the new investors got involved in The Hundred franchises — although pacer Mohammad Amir and allrounder Imad Wasim featured as replacements.

Most of Pakistan’s highest-profile players were unavailable for some of the 2025 tournament because of Pakistan’s international schedule. This year, Pakistan has two tests in the West Indies during The Hundred tournament and begins a three-test series against England soon after the final.

Previously, Shaheen Shah Afridi and Haris Rauf (Welsh Fire), Shadab Khan (Birmingham Phoenix), Wasim (Trent Rockets) and Amir (Oval Invincibles) have been among the leading Pakistani players to have featured in The Hundred.

Harry Brook, who captains England’s limited-overs teams, will play for Sunrisers Leeds after being signed as the highest-paid player in The Hundred and said it would be “a shame” if Pakistan players were excluded from franchises.

“Pakistan have been a great cricket nation for many years and have some awesome players, some of the best players in the world,” said Brook, speaking while representing England at the T20 World Cup being held in India and Sri Lanka.

The 2026 edition of The Hundred is scheduled to run from July 21-Aug. 16. The competition, created to attract younger fans to the sport in England, has been running since 2021.

Political tension between Pakistan and India has meant there has been no bilateral cricket between the two nations since Pakistan toured India for a white-ball series in 2012.