Indian temple controversy turns political as protests grow

1 / 4
Indian Hindu activists block a road to the Sabarimala Temple, at Vadaserikara town in Pathanamthitta district in India's southern Kerala state on October 19, 2018. (AFP)
2 / 4
Indian police watch over Hindu activists blocking a road to the Sabarimala Temple, at Vadaserikara town in Pathanamthitta district in India's southern Kerala state on October 19, 2018. (AFP)
3 / 4
Indian Hindu activists block a road to the Sabarimala Temple, at Vadaserikara town in Pathanamthitta district in India’s southern Kerala state on October 19, 2018. (AFP)
4 / 4
Indian Hindu activists block a road to the Sabarimala Temple, at Vadaserikara town in Pathanamthitta district in India’s southern Kerala state on October 19, 2018. (AFP)
Updated 19 October 2018
Follow

Indian temple controversy turns political as protests grow

  • Three dozen priests staged a sit-in against the verdict overturning the ban that kept women aged between 10 and 50 out of the temple.
  • Though Hindus form a majority of the Kerala's population of more than 35 million, it is home to millions of Muslims and Christians.

KOCHI/NEW DELHI: A senior leader of India’s ruling party warned on Friday that protesters in the southern state of Kerala would take the law into their hands if officials attempted to let women enter a hill temple at the center of a raging controversy.
A political tinge for the controversy could help Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s party gain ground in Kerala, where it has never made much headway, and won just one of 98 seats it contested in the last elections to the state assembly in 2016.
Protests against women entering the Hindu temple grew on Friday, with hundreds of hard-liners blocking three women from entering the Sabarimala temple for a third day.
The demonstrators were defying a Supreme Court verdict that overturned a decades-old ruling by a lower court denying entry to women of menstrual age, whom some Hindu communities consider to be ritually unclean.
“If the government is trying to implement its agenda in Sabarimala, we will prevent it, even by taking the law into our hands,” said K. Surendran, the general secretary of Modi’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party in the state.
“Sabarimala is not a place for anybody to tamper with.”
Surendran accused the state’s Communist Party government, which has tried to implement the verdict, of provoking devotees after police gave protection to some women who sought to reach the remote site.
He did not elaborate on what the party plans to do, however.
Three dozen priests staged a sit-in against the verdict overturning the ban that kept women aged between 10 and 50 out of the temple, where a celibate deity, Lord Ayyappan, is worshipped.
Television broadcast images of scores of police attempting to calm emotional protesters, who consider the verdict a challenge to tradition and interference in religious affairs. The Supreme Court called the tradition patriarchal.
Though Hindus form a majority of the state’s population of more than 35 million, it is home to millions of Muslims and Christians.
The controversy has fired up Hindu religious sentiment, with some residents supporting the view that the temple devotees’ feelings ought to be respected.
Members of Modi’s BJP in the state have also strongly backed those seeking to block the entry of women.
Hindu hard-liners, including members of the BJP’s youth wing, have clashed with police and attacked women, including journalists, who have tried to get to the temple.
Two women who got close were forced to turn back in the face of protests and a threat by the head priest to shut the temple if they entered, senior Kerala police official S. Sreejith told reporters on Friday.
A third woman turned back at the request of police, citing the tension.


Philippines House panel finds bid to impeach Marcos lacks substance

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Philippines House panel finds bid to impeach Marcos lacks substance

  • President denies allegations of corruption and constitutional violations
  • Lower chamber is currently dominated by loyalists of the president
MANILA: The Philippine House justice committee on Wednesday said two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., accusing him of corruption, violating the constitution and betraying public trust, were lacking in substance.
On a third day of discussions about the complaints filed separately by a lawyer and activists, the committee overwhelmingly decided both lacked merit. Marcos, who is midway through his term in office, had ‌denied wrongdoing.
The ‌House of Representatives is expected to ‌convene ⁠for a plenary vote ‌where it could either uphold the committee’s findings or override them. The chamber is currently dominated by loyalists of the president.
Gerville Luistro, the head of the justice committee, said they plan to finish the report and submit it to the plenary on Monday next week.
“We intend to transmit right away to the plenary, but ⁠it depends on the plenary as to when the same will be tackled ‌on the floor,” Luistro told a press ‍conference.
For Marcos to be impeached ‍it must be supported by at least one-third of the ‍lower house. If that happens, he would be the second Philippine head of state to be impeached after Joseph Estrada, whose 2001 trial was aborted when some prosecutors walked out. The complaints against Marcos included his decision to allow his predecessor Rodrigo Duterte to be arrested and taken to The Hague to face trial ⁠at the International Criminal Court over thousands of killings during his notorious “war on drugs.”
Marcos, 68, was also accused of abusing his authority in spending public funds that led to a corruption scandal involving flood-control projects. His alleged drug use, which he has denied, also made him unfit to run the country, according to one of the complaints.
If the lower house decides to impeach him, the Senate would be required to convene for trial, where its 24 members serve as jurors.
Five top officials have been impeached in the ‌Philippines and only one of those, a former chief justice, was convicted and removed from office.