Kashmir observes shutdown, fearing end of autonomy

Traders shout slogans from a police vehicle after being detained during Monday's march in Srinagar. (AFP)
Updated 07 August 2018
Follow

Kashmir observes shutdown, fearing end of autonomy

  • India’s Supreme Court adjourns hearing on Article 35A of constitution
  • A lesser-known nongovernmental organization, We the Citizens, has challenged the validity of these articles in the Supreme Court

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned hearing the petitions challenging the validity of Article 35A, which gives Jammu and Kashmir a special status in the Indian Constitution. 

The petitions will now be heard in the week beginning Aug. 27, said Chief Justice Dipak Misra. 

Monday was the second day for Kashmir valley observing a shutdown protesting any annulment of Article 35A, which confers special status to the permanent residents of Kashmir and bars people from outside the state from acquiring any immovable property in the state.

Besides Article 35A, Article 370 of the constitution grants special status to Jammu and Kashmir.

A lesser-known nongovernmental organization, We the Citizens, has challenged the validity of these articles in the Supreme Court. The fact that the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is not opposing the petitions in the court has raised alarm bells among the people of Kashmir. 

“No court, whether in India or in Pakistan, has any jurisdiction to take decisions that can in any way affect the disputed status of J&K as its original citizens are yet to exercise the right to determine their final dispensation as promised by the UN and backed by India and Pakistan,’’ said the separatist leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq in a statement.

Yasin Khan, the chairperson of the Kashmir Economic Alliance, an amalgam of various trade and industrial bodies, said in a press statement that “for safeguarding our rights, we are even ready to give our blood. The attempts are being made to remove Article 35A through the court and we are not going to tolerate it.”

However, BJP leader Kavindra Gupta, former deputy chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir, counters this argument and underlines that “the root causes of separatism in the valley are the Articles 35A and 370,” and that the BJP opposes these constitutional provisions.

Gupta told Arab News that the valley-based parties are using these special provisions in the constitution to run their political shops, “and we don’t want them to succeed in their designs.”

The People’s Democratic Party (PDP), the senior alliance partner of the BJP in the previous government in the Kashmir valley, said: “The ruling party in Delhi is using this issue not for the benefit of Kashmiris but to polarize the voters in mainstream India and win the general elections in 2019.”

Senior PDP leader Nizamuddin Bhat believes that the issue of abrogation of Article 35A and Article 370 did not do the BJP any good. 

“It has united all the Kashmiris, be it the separatist Hurriyat (All Parties Hurriyat Conference) or mainstream political parties. They are all now standing on one platform to protect the larger interest of the state.”

He added: “The BJP is having short-term national interest in mind by taking up this issue. The party just wants to capitalize electorally in the next general elections by raking up this emotional and divisive issue.”

Srinagar-based senior journalist Manzoor Ul-Hassan said Articles 35A and 370 are there to protect the basic constitutional rights of Kashmiri people, which makes Kashmir special by giving it an autonomy and a separate identity. 

“Any attempt to temper them will have far-reaching consequences and will be opposed by each and every Kashmiri,” Manzoor added.


Le Pen: French far-right leader battling for political survival

Updated 13 sec ago
Follow

Le Pen: French far-right leader battling for political survival

  • Le Pen has said prosecutors wanted her “political death,” adding that she was being put on trial as a “political target“
  • Her life has been marked by the legacy of her outwardly racist father

PARIS: Far-right leader Marine Le Pen, who needs to have a graft conviction overturned to seize her best chance at the French presidency, risks seeing her life’s work upended if she loses her appeal.
Le Pen took over leadership of the National Front (FN) in 2011 from her father Jean-Marie, who co-founded France’s main postwar far-right movement.
In a move to distance it from the legacy of her father, who openly made antisemitic and racist statements, she renamed the party the National Rally (RN) and embarked on a policy she dubbed “de-demonization.”
The work bore fruit. In snap legislative polls in summer 2023, the RN emerged as the largest single party in the National Assembly — although without the outright majority it had targeted.
That gave Le Pen’s party power over French politics it had never before enjoyed, which she used by backing a no-confidence vote that toppled the government of prime minister Michel Barnier later in the year.
Critics accuse the party of still being inherently racist, taking too long to distance itself from Russia after its invasion of Ukraine and resorting to corrupt tactics to ease its strained finances, allegations Le Pen denies.
But by playing on people’s day-to-day concerns about immigration and the cost of living, Le Pen was seen as having her best chance to become France’s president in 2027 after three unsuccessful attempts.

- ‘Political target’ -
But her conviction last year, involving the use of fake jobs at the European Union parliament to channel funds to her party to employ people in France, has posed a potentially insurmountable hurdle to her long-sought end goal.
She was banned with immediate effect from standing for office for five years, which effectively disqualified her from running in next year’s presidential election.
Le Pen, 57, has said prosecutors wanted her “political death,” adding that she was being put on trial as a “political target.”
With her own ambitions hanging in the balance, she has backed her young lieutenant and protege, 30-year-old Jordan Bardella, to run in her place if needed.
“Bardella can win instead of me,” she told La Tribune Dimanche in December.
A poll in November predicted that Bardella — who is the RN party chief and not among those accused in the trial against Le Pen — would win the second round of the 2027 elections, no matter who stands against him.

- ‘Immense pain’ -
After coming third in the 2012 presidential polls, Marine Le Pen made the run-off in 2017 and 2022 but was beaten by Emmanuel Macron on both occasions.
Yet 2027 could be different, with Macron not allowed to stand again under France’s constitution.
Le Pen’s life has been marked by the legacy of her outwardly racist father, a veteran of the long war in Algeria that ultimately led to the former French colony’s independence.
She expelled her father, who once called the gas chambers of the Holocaust a “detail of history,” from the party in 2011, helping to temper its toxic image.
But his death last year aged 96 plunged his daughter into grief.
“I will never forgive myself” for expelling him, she said, describing him as a “warrior” in a tribute.
“I know it caused him immense pain,” she said of the man opponents nicknamed “the devil of the republic.”
“This decision was one of the most difficult of my life. And until the end of my life, I will always ask myself the question: ‘Could I have done this differently?’,” she said.