WASHINGTON: The creation of a new Texas-based Army command focused on the future will help the soldier service adapt to the emerging threats from powers such as China and Russia after years of counterinsurgency warfare, Army leaders said Friday.
Gen. Mark Milley, the Army’s chief of staff, told reporters the military recognized that China and Russia have improved their military capabilities while the US has been fighting insurgents in Iraq, Syria and elsewhere for the past 16 years or more.
“We are in the midst of a change in the very character of war,” said Milley, adding that the Army set aside major modernization programs in order to fight the current fight. “No one was solely dedicated to looking into the deep future and determining the implications to the United States Army and the conduct of ground combat of this changing character of war that we’re coming to grips with.”
In response, the Army announced it will launch the Futures Command in Austin, Texas, aimed at insuring the service is ready for future wars.
Army Secretary Mark Esper said the command is the Army’s most significant reorganization in decades and will help provide soldiers with the weapons and equipment they need when they need it.
The Army laid out plans to create the command last October, marking the first time since 1973 that the service has added such a high-level new headquarters.
The command is expected to have a staff of about 500 people, led by a four-star general. Ryan McCarthy, the undersecretary of the Army, said the incentive package offered by the city of Austin is still under discussion, and there are no final costs yet for the command.
Initially, 15 cities were in contention, but the Army narrowed down the list to five finalists last month: Austin, Boston, Minneapolis, Philadelphia and Raleigh, North Carolina.
McCarthy said Austin outscored all the other cities on the key criteria, including access to universities with high-quality engineering schools, academic talent, flourishing incubators for high-tech startups, good quality of life and reasonable cost of living.
Tech-savvy Austin is about an hour’s drive from Fort Hood, one of the largest military installations in the country. Lt. Gen. Eric Wesley said at an Austin news conference that the head of a startup hub told the Army it needed to step outside those installations and start “smashing into young kids with laptops that hangout in Starbucks.”
Regents for the University of Texas System voted Friday to provide space for the command in a building the system owns in downtown Austin. Details of the agreement are still being discussed, the system said in a statement Friday.
“One thing I know the Army is looking for is the brain power than can be harnessed from this region,” Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said.
An advance team is already heading to Austin to begin setting up the command, which the Army said should be fully operational in about a year.
![]()
New Army command aims to help counter China, Russia threats
New Army command aims to help counter China, Russia threats
- The Army laid out plans to create the command last October, marking the first time since 1973 that the service has added such a high-level new headquarters
- US has been fighting insurgents in Iraq, Syria and elsewhere for the past 16 years or more
Bangladesh to vote on democratic reform charter
- Bangladesh votes on Thursday in the first parliamentary elections since a 2024 uprising ended Sheikh Hasina’s 15-year iron-fisted rule
DHAKA: Bangladesh votes on Thursday in the first parliamentary elections since a 2024 uprising ended Sheikh Hasina’s 15-year iron-fisted rule — and also holds a landmark referendum for sweeping democratic reforms.
The interim government led by Muhammad Yunus, the 85?year?old Nobel Peace Prize winner, says the reform charter is designed to prevent a return to autocratic one-party rule.
The lengthy document, known as the “July Charter” after the uprising that toppled Hasina, proposes term limits for prime ministers, the creation of an upper house of parliament, stronger presidential powers, and greater judicial independence.
What are the reforms?
Voters will be asked whether they approve the charter, which lays out wide?ranging constitutional, electoral, and institutional reforms.
These include expanding parliament into a bicameral system, with a new 100?seat upper house allocated according to each party’s share of the national vote.
It also includes increased representation of women in parliament, and the election of the deputy speaker and parliamentary committee chairs from the opposition.
Along with the polls, the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) calls it a “critical juncture for Bangladesh’s democratic and constitutional order.”
Who supports it?
Yunus, who will step down after the vote, has promoted the charter as the defining legacy of his caretaker administration.
“If you cast the ‘yes’ vote, the door to building the new Bangladesh will open,” Yunus said in backing the reforms.
Hasina’s former ruling Awami League has been barred from taking part.
A “yes” vote is backed by the key frontrunners, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), and its rival, the Jamaat-e-Islami led coalition.
That includes the National Citizen Party (NCP), formed by student leaders who spearheaded the uprising.
But many parties have also submitted notes of dissent over elements of the charter.
Will it be approved?
With key parties calling for a yes vote, many believe it will pass.
But many ordinary voters say they are confused by the complexity of the proposals.
“Knowledge gaps are huge,” Dhaka’s IID policy research center warned on Tuesday, saying just over a third of people it had surveyed — 37 percent — know what the charter includes.
Among those without formal eduction, that drops to eight percent.
The IID said the results suggested “closed-door reform bargaining” was prioritized “over public engagement at the scale required for an informed, inclusive referendum.”
The referendum, passed by a simple majority, notes that if approved, it will be “binding on the parties that win” the election.
But it would still need to be ratified by the new parliament.
The interim government led by Muhammad Yunus, the 85?year?old Nobel Peace Prize winner, says the reform charter is designed to prevent a return to autocratic one-party rule.
The lengthy document, known as the “July Charter” after the uprising that toppled Hasina, proposes term limits for prime ministers, the creation of an upper house of parliament, stronger presidential powers, and greater judicial independence.
What are the reforms?
Voters will be asked whether they approve the charter, which lays out wide?ranging constitutional, electoral, and institutional reforms.
These include expanding parliament into a bicameral system, with a new 100?seat upper house allocated according to each party’s share of the national vote.
It also includes increased representation of women in parliament, and the election of the deputy speaker and parliamentary committee chairs from the opposition.
Along with the polls, the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) calls it a “critical juncture for Bangladesh’s democratic and constitutional order.”
Who supports it?
Yunus, who will step down after the vote, has promoted the charter as the defining legacy of his caretaker administration.
“If you cast the ‘yes’ vote, the door to building the new Bangladesh will open,” Yunus said in backing the reforms.
Hasina’s former ruling Awami League has been barred from taking part.
A “yes” vote is backed by the key frontrunners, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), and its rival, the Jamaat-e-Islami led coalition.
That includes the National Citizen Party (NCP), formed by student leaders who spearheaded the uprising.
But many parties have also submitted notes of dissent over elements of the charter.
Will it be approved?
With key parties calling for a yes vote, many believe it will pass.
But many ordinary voters say they are confused by the complexity of the proposals.
“Knowledge gaps are huge,” Dhaka’s IID policy research center warned on Tuesday, saying just over a third of people it had surveyed — 37 percent — know what the charter includes.
Among those without formal eduction, that drops to eight percent.
The IID said the results suggested “closed-door reform bargaining” was prioritized “over public engagement at the scale required for an informed, inclusive referendum.”
The referendum, passed by a simple majority, notes that if approved, it will be “binding on the parties that win” the election.
But it would still need to be ratified by the new parliament.
Latest updates
Recommended
© 2026 SAUDI RESEARCH & PUBLISHING COMPANY, All Rights Reserved And subject to Terms of Use Agreement.