Philippines keeps 2018 tourist arrivals target despite Boracay closure

1 / 3
A boy makes a sand castle at the beach of Boracay Island in central Philippines one day before its closure. President Rodrigo Duterte ordered the world-famous destination closed to tourists for up to six months from April 26, after describing it as a ‘cesspool’ tainted by raw sewage. (AFP)
2 / 3
Tourists pose for photos along a beach on Boracay Island in central Philippines. The Philippines has imposed a six-month closure on its best-known holiday island for rehabilitation. (AFP)
3 / 3
Tourists frolic at the white sands beach of Boracay Island ahead of its closure. President Rodrigo Duterte ordered the once-idyllic white-sand resort closed to tourists for up to six months from April 26. (AFP)
Updated 05 June 2018
Follow

Philippines keeps 2018 tourist arrivals target despite Boracay closure

DUBAI: The Philippine government is keeping its target for tourist arrivals this year despite the closure of Boracay Island, one of the country’s major magnets for foreign visitors.

“[Our target tourist arrivals] is still the same, 7.5 million [this year]. We’re hoping we will be able to [reach] the target,” newly appointed tourism secretary Bernadette Fatima Romulo Puyat said during her confirmation hearing on Wednesday.

The world-renowned Boracay Island, located in central Philippines, received over two million tourists last year, with foreign visitors coming mostly from China, South Korea and Taiwan. Tourist spending in the island also rose 14.83 in 2017 to 56.15 billion pesos ($1.07 billion) from 48.9 billion pesos the previous year.

The Philippine government has implemented a six-month closure of Boracay, named in 2016 as the world’s best island by Condé Nast Traveler's 2016 Readers’ Choice Awards, over concerns the island’s famous white sand beaches and turquoise waters have become a ‘cesspool’ because of environmental abuse.

No tourists – domestic or foreign –  are allowed entry into the island during its half-year clean up and rehabilitation.

“Almost all our cancelled bookings were for Boracay; our business was affected by the refunds we have to give our clients,” tourism operator Izrael Felipe G. Nilo, Jr. told Arab News. “Hopefully the closure [of Boracay] will be lifted by October, or even earlier.”

Tourists are now diverting into alternative destinations with Boracay closed, Nilo added.

“There was a definite effect of the Boracay closure on our international markets, particularly the Korean and Chinese markets which typically hits its peak from June onwards,” Jose Clemente III, president of the Tourism Congress of the Philippines, meanwhile told Arab News. “Thousands of bookings and losses into the hundreds of millions for the resorts and other establishments will have been lost due to the closure.”

“[Achieving the tourism target] will be a tall order considering that one of the Philippines’ main destinations was closed,” Clemente added. “We have been trying to divert our bookings to the other destinations like Cebu, Bohol, Palawan and others but since the closure was done on short notice, those other destinations were already full or approaching full capacity.”

Tourism chief Romulo Puyat also said her department would be promoting these alternative destinations and “a lot of them [tourists] have already diverted to Cebu, Siargao and Bohol.”

She also committed “to prioritize improving polices on access, connectivity and security as well as enhance programs on tourism infrastructure.”

Cebu is home to the Sinulog Festival and whale shark watching in Oslob; Siargao is considered the Philippines’ surfing capital while Bohol boasts of the tarsier – the world’s smallest primate – the Chocolate Hills and Panglao’s beaches, which are comparable to that of Boracay’s.

“The Philippines has become a popular in the past few years and our destinations have been experiencing good arrivals which makes diversions from Boracay a bit difficult. While we do have other upcoming destinations like Siargao, Dumaguete and others, they may not yet be ready to take in the massive numbers for a variety of reasons such as accessibility, available accommodations, infrastructure to name a few,” Clemente said.


Saudi Aramco bolsters global oil market stability amid rising regional tensions

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Saudi Aramco bolsters global oil market stability amid rising regional tensions

RIYADH: Amid growing logistical challenges facing the energy sector, operational moves by Saudi Aramco are emerging as a stabilizing factor in global oil supply.

The company has offered additional crude shipments on the spot market, a step analysts see as aimed at absorbing supply shocks and ensuring the continued flow of oil through key energy corridors.

The move aligns with Saudi Arabia’s long-standing role as a leading global producer and is intended to limit price volatility and maintain balance between supply and demand at a time of heightened geopolitical uncertainty.

Reuters reported that Aramco has offered more than 4 million barrels of Saudi crude through rare spot tenders, as tensions between the US and Iran disrupt Middle Eastern exports.

Mohammad Al-Sabban, former senior adviser to the Saudi energy minister, said the current surge in oil prices does not necessarily reflect an immediate shortage of supply. Instead, it is largely driven by what energy markets call a “geopolitical risk premium.”

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Al-Sabban said prices remaining above $100 per barrel reflect global anxiety that the conflict could expand and threaten future supply security.

He noted that higher prices, while boosting short-term revenues and fiscal surpluses for oil-exporting countries, also bring hidden costs. These include increased spending on security measures to protect oil infrastructure — costs that rise in a volatile regional environment where Gulf states face mounting security pressures.

Al-Sabban also pointed out that spot market sales are currently generating greater returns than long-term futures contracts. The uncertainty surrounding the conflict has led buyers to pay premiums for immediate deliveries, making spot transactions more attractive during the current crisis.

Strategic chokepoint

Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, which carries roughly 20 percent of global oil supply, remains central to the crisis.

Al-Sabban warned that even a temporary closure of the waterway would inevitably reduce available supplies, potentially triggering panic in markets and forcing countries to draw from strategic reserves.

He recalled historical precedents, noting that during the Iran-Iraq war, energy markets became a hub for speculation, with negative economic consequences emerging later.

Asked whether the conflict represents a short-term economic opportunity or a broader risk for regional economies, Al-Sabban said the reality is a mix of both. High prices may offer temporary gains as long as oil remains above $100 a barrel, but a prolonged conflict could ultimately impose heavier economic burdens through rising logistical and security costs.

Flexible response

Financial and economic adviser Hussein Al-Attas said Aramco’s decision to release additional cargoes on the spot market reflects significant flexibility in managing supply and responding quickly to market shifts amid rising demand and concerns about potential shortages.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the move sends an important signal to global markets that Saudi Arabia continues to play the role of a swing producer, capable of intervening to maintain market balance and ease fears about supply security.

Al-Attas added that the recent surge in oil prices is largely tied to geopolitical tensions in a region that represents the heart of global energy supply.

While Brent crude could remain above $100 in the short term if supply concerns persist, he noted that history shows price spikes driven by political tensions are often temporary unless they lead to a prolonged disruption in supply.

Higher oil prices naturally increase revenues for exporting countries, potentially strengthening fiscal balances and enabling governments to finance spending and development projects, Al-Attas remarked.

Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, may therefore benefit financially in the short term.

However, he cautioned that such gains are usually temporary rather than structural. Prolonged high energy prices can slow global economic growth by fueling inflation, which may eventually reduce demand for oil. As a result, the current price surge may represent a temporary financial opportunity rather than a lasting shift in oil revenues.

Ultimately, Al-Attas said the crisis carries two opposing dynamics: Gulf countries may benefit financially in the short term, but any wider regional conflict could pose greater risks to economic and commercial stability.

For that reason, he added, the region’s strategic interest ultimately lies in stable energy markets and uninterrupted oil flows, which are essential for sustaining global demand and supporting long-term economic growth.