‘Secular firebrand’ to face Erdogan in Turkish poll

Turkey's main opposition CHP’s candidate Muharrem Ince starts his campaign in Ankara for the upcoming snap presidential election, on Thursday. (AFP)
Updated 05 May 2018
Follow

‘Secular firebrand’ to face Erdogan in Turkish poll

  • Polls show that Ince and Erdogan will be running in the second-round vote for the presidency
  • Ince previously ran as the sole challenger in the previous two-party elections

ANKARA: Turkey’s main opposition CHP has named Muharrem Ince as its presidential candidate against Recep Tayyip Erdogan in elections on June 24.

Polls show that Ince and Erdogan will be running in the second-round vote for the presidency.

Ince, who comes from a rural background, is known for his opposition to a recent amendment to lift parliamentary immunity that led to the imprisonment of many lawmakers from the pro-Kurdish HDP, including its co-leaders.

A strong critic of Erdogan, Ince has been a CHP parliamentarian since 2002 after spending years as a high school physics teacher.

“I will be everyone’s president, a non-partisan president. The depressing times will end on June 24,” Ince told supporters at a meeting in Ankara, where he was introduced by the CHP leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu.

Ince previously ran as the sole challenger in the previous two-party elections, in 2014 and 2018, but failed in both attempts.

Selim Sazak, a researcher on Turkish politics at Brown University’s Watson Institute, said Ince was a compromise candidate between the centrists and the progressives.

“The most immediate meaning is that CHP is playing it safe with its base,” he told Arab News.

“Over the past years, CHP tried reaching across the aisle in both directions. In the 2014 presidential elections, they tried an alliance with the Turkish nationalists, but it failed. A year later, they tried a de facto alliance with HDP in the June 2015 elections. That didn’t go far either,” he said.

Sazak described Ince as a “secular firebrand. He is a gifted orator. He is also a true party man, rose up the ranks, knows the grass-roots very well.”

Ozgur Unluhisarcikli, Ankara office director of the German Marshall Fund of the US, said Ince had strong support among the CHP’s grass-roots.

“He is also in a good position to attract the voters of the newly founded center right IYI Party and the HDP in the second round, assuming there is one,” he told Arab News.

Ince’s biggest challenge, according to Unluhisarcikli, will be attracting the conservative vote, a prerequisite for him to win the elections.

Ince’s only scandal is having been photographed drinking beer during Ramadan, a turn-off for conservative voters. In a bid to appeal to Islamist voters, Ince began his election campaign by attending Friday prayers at Haci Bayram Mosque in Ankara shortly after his nomination.

The CHP’s voter support is believed to be 25 percent, while the coalition between the ruling AKP and the nationalist MHP is expected to gain 40 percent of the votes.

To win in the first round of the elections, a candidate needs 50 percent plus one of the votes. Polls indicate a second round is likely to be held on July 8.

On Friday, HDP announced its presidential candidate, Selahattin Demirtas, a former co-leader who has been in prison since November 2017 on terror-related charges.

Demirtas, who will run his campaign from behind bars, received about 10 percent of the votes in previous presidential elections where he ran against Erdogan.


Gaza ceasefire enters phase two despite unresolved issues

Updated 16 January 2026
Follow

Gaza ceasefire enters phase two despite unresolved issues

  • Under the second phase, Gaza is to be administered by a 15-member Palestinian technocratic committee operating under the supervision of a so-called “Board of Peace,” to be chaired by Trump

JERUSALEM: A US-backed plan to end the war in Gaza has entered its second phase despite unresolved disputes between Israel and Hamas over alleged ceasefire violations and issues unaddressed in the first stage.
The most contentious questions remain Hamas’s refusal to publicly commit to full disarmament, a non-negotiable demand from Israel, and Israel’s lack of clarity over whether it will fully withdraw its forces from Gaza.
The creation of a Palestinian technocratic committee, announced on Wednesday, is intended to manage day-to-day governance in post-war Gaza, but it leaves unresolved broader political and security questions.
Below is a breakdown of developments from phase one to the newly launched second stage.

Gains and gaps in phase one

The first phase of the plan, part of a 20-point proposal unveiled by US President Donald Trump, began on October 10 and aimed primarily to stop the fighting in the Gaza Strip, allow in aid and secure the return of all remaining living and deceased hostages held by Hamas and allied Palestinian militant groups.
All hostages have since been returned, except for the remains of one Israeli, Ran Gvili.
Israel has accused Hamas of delaying the handover of Gvili’s body, while Hamas has said widespread destruction in Gaza made locating the remains difficult.
Gvili’s family had urged mediators to delay the transition to phase two.
“Moving on breaks my heart. Have we given up? Ran did not give up on anyone,” his sister, Shira Gvili, said after mediators announced the move.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said efforts to recover Gvili’s remains would continue but has not publicly commented on the launch of phase two.
Hamas has accused Israel of repeated ceasefire violations, including air strikes, firing on civilians and advancing the so-called “Yellow Line,” an informal boundary separating areas under Israeli military control from those under Hamas authority.
Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry said Israeli forces had killed 451 people since the ceasefire took effect.
Israel’s military said it had targeted suspected militants who crossed into restricted zones near the Yellow Line, adding that three Israeli soldiers were also killed by militants during the same period.
Aid agencies say Israel has not allowed the volume of humanitarian assistance envisaged under phase one, a claim Israel rejects.
Gaza, whose borders and access points remain under Israeli control, continues to face severe shortages of food, clean water, medicine and fuel.
Israel and the United Nations have repeatedly disputed figures on the number of aid trucks permitted to enter the Palestinian territory.

Disarmament, governance in phase two

Under the second phase, Gaza is to be administered by a 15-member Palestinian technocratic committee operating under the supervision of a so-called “Board of Peace,” to be chaired by Trump.
“The ball is now in the court of the mediators, the American guarantor and the international community to empower the committee,” Bassem Naim, a senior Hamas leader, said in a statement on Thursday.
Trump on Thursday announced the board of peace had been formed and its members would be announced “shortly.”
Mediators Egypt, Turkiye and Qatar said Ali Shaath, a former deputy minister in the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority, had been appointed to lead the committee.
Later on Thursday, Egyptian state television reported that all members of the committee had “arrived in Egypt and begun their meetings in preparation for entering the territory.”
Al-Qahera News, which is close to Egypt’s state intelligence services, said the members’ arrival followed US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff’s announcement on Wednesday “of the start of the second phase and what was agreed upon at the meeting of Palestinian factions in Cairo yesterday.”
Shaath, in a recent interview, said the committee would rely on “brains rather than weapons” and would not coordinate with armed groups.
On Wednesday, Witkoff said phase two aims for the “full demilitarization and reconstruction of Gaza,” including the disarmament of all unauthorized armed factions.
Witkoff said Washington expected Hamas to fulfil its remaining obligations, including the return of Gvili’s body, warning that failure to do so would bring “serious consequences.”
The plan also calls for the deployment of an International Stabilization Force to help secure Gaza and train vetted Palestinian police units.
For Palestinians, the central issue remains Israel’s full military withdrawal from Gaza — a step included in the framework but for which no detailed timetable has been announced.
With fundamental disagreements persisting over disarmament, withdrawal and governance, diplomats say the success of phase two will depend on sustained pressure from mediators and whether both sides are willing — or able — to move beyond long-standing red lines.