Mike Pompeo vows diplomatic approach to Iran nuclear threat

CIA Director Mike Pompeo testifies before a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee confirmation hearing on his nomination to be secretary of state on Capitol Hill in Washington on April 12, 2018. (REUTERS/Leah Millis)
Updated 13 April 2018
Follow

Mike Pompeo vows diplomatic approach to Iran nuclear threat

  • As a congressman, Pompeo was a fierce critic of the deal
  • Senator Lindsey Graham says Pompeo's appointment as top US diplomat is timely

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump’s pick to become Washington’s top diplomat vowed to work with US allies to strengthen the Iran deal Thursday and played down fears he is bent on regime change in North Korea.
Outgoing CIA chief Mike Pompeo has a reputation as a “war hawk” and a hard-liner, and his nomination as secretary of state was seen as a sign that Trump’s administration intends to rip up the nuclear accord.
But on Thursday, grilled by the senators who will approve or refuse his appointment, he strove to emphasize that he would work toward a May 12 deadline to agree a new framework with skeptical European allies to “fix” the deal.
Both France’s President Emmanuel Macron and Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel are due to visit Washington on separate official visits before May 12, in part to lobby Trump to preserve a deal they see as the best way to stop Tehran getting the bomb.
Trump has long derided the 2015 deal as a capitulation to Tehran and has declared it no longer is in US interests to maintain the sanctions relief that his predecessor Barack Obama accorded Tehran in exchange for controls on its nuclear program.
As a congressman, Pompeo was a fierce critic of the deal, and his nomination — along with this week’s appointment of arch-hawk John Bolton as Trump’s national security adviser — has sharpened concerns that Washington may abandon the pact.
But at his nomination hearing, he was keen to stress the importance of diplomacy in seeking a tougher framework that may appease Trump’s concerns, and confirmed that as CIA director he had seen no evidence that Iran had broken its side of the bargain.
“I want to fix this deal. That’s the objective,” he told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
“If there is no chance to fix it, I’ll recommend to the president we do our level best to work with our allies to achieve a better outcome and better deal. Even after May 12th, even after May 12th, there’s still much diplomatic work to be done.”
Asked whether, for the moment, Iran remains in compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the Iran deal’s implementation mechanism, Pompeo said: “I’ve seen no evidence that they are not in compliance today.”
Pompeo was also asked whether he favors US military action to overthrow the regime in North Korea, which has developed a nuclear arsenal that may soon threaten US cities but has also invited Trump to a summit with its leader to discuss disarmament.
“I’ve articulated my own personal views on this,” Pompeo told the committee. “We have a responsibility to achieve a condition where Kim Jong Un is unable to threaten the United States of America with a nuclear weapon.”
Pressed on whether this meant he favors overthrowing the Pyongyang regime, Pompeo stressed: “I’m not advocating for regime change.”
Pompeo is a known entity for Trump, someone who briefed the president nearly daily and shares a gung ho attitude toward Iran.
And as head of the Central Intelligence Agency, he has already been vetted by the US Senate, where 14 Democrats joined Republicans in confirming him to that post.
It appears at least one Democrat will be needed to get Pompeo successfully through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which holds the hearing Thursday and is expected to vote on Pompeo in the coming weeks.
The committee has 11 Republicans and 10 Democrats, and Republican Rand Paul has already expressed his opposition to Pompeo, for the latter’s support of the Iraq war and his aggressive posture against Iran.
But Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican hawk on foreign policy, has said Pompeo would be taking over during a “dangerous” period globally, and that “I think he’s the right guy at the right time.”
Trump has gone without a top US diplomat for nearly a month after he sacked former oil executive Rex Tillerson barely one year into a period in office already marked by upheavals in the department that left US diplomats demoralized and complaining of absent leadership.
In that time he has threatened a trade war with China, blamed Russia and Syria for a suspected chemical attack that killed more than 40 people, and ratcheted up anti-Russia rhetoric on Twitter, including Wednesday’s warning that “missiles will be coming” in response to the chemical atrocity in Syria.
Pompeo has made the rounds meeting senators including Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Bob Corker, who noted their “very good meeting” but did not declare whether he would support him.


Geoeconomic confrontation tops global risks in 2026: WEF report

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Geoeconomic confrontation tops global risks in 2026: WEF report

  • Also armed conflict, extreme climate, public polarization, AI
  • None ‘a foregone conclusion,’ says WEF’s MD Saadia Zahidi

DUBAI: Geoeconomic confrontation has emerged as the top global risk this year, followed by state-based armed conflict, according to a new World Economic Forum report.

The Global Risks Report 2026, released on Wednesday, found that both risks climbed eight places year-on-year, underscoring a sharp deterioration in the global outlook amid increased international competition.

The top five risks are geoeconomic confrontation (18 percent of respondents), state-based armed conflict (14 percent), extreme weather events (8 percent), societal polarization (7 percent) and misinformation and disinformation (7 percent).

The WEF’s Managing Director Saadia Zahidi said the report “offers an early warning system as the age of competition compounds global risks — from geoeconomic confrontation to unchecked technology to rising debt — and changes our collective capacity to address them.

“But none of these risks are a foregone conclusion.”

The report assesses risks across three timeframes: immediate (2026); short-to-medium term (next two years); and long term (next 10 years).

Economic risks show the largest overall increase in the two-year outlook, with both economic downturn and inflation jumping eight positions.

Misinformation and disinformation rank fifth this year but rise to second place in the two-year outlook and fourth over the 10-year horizon.

The report suggests this reflects growing anxiety around the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence, with adverse outcomes linked to AI surging from 30th place in the two-year timeframe to fifth in the 10-year outlook.

Uncertainty dominates the global risk outlook, according to the report.

Surveyed leaders and experts view both the short- and long-term outlook negatively, with 50 percent expecting a turbulent or stormy global environment over the next two years, rising to 57 percent over the next decade.

A further 40 percent and 32 percent, respectively, describe the outlook as unsettled across the two- and 10-year timeframes, while just 1 percent anticipate a calm global outlook in either period.

Environmental risks ease slightly in the short-term rankings. Extreme weather fell from second to fourth place and pollution from sixth to ninth. Meanwhile, critical changes to Earth systems and biodiversity loss dropped seven and five positions, respectively.

However, over the next decade, environmental threats re-emerge as the most severe, with extreme weather, biodiversity loss, and critical changes to Earth systems topping the global risk rankings.

Looking ahead over the next decade, around 75 percent of respondents anticipate a turbulent or stormy environmental outlook, making it the most pessimistic assessment across all risk categories.

Zahidi said that “the challenges highlighted in the report underscore both the scale of the potential perils we face and our shared responsibility to shape what comes next.”

Despite the gloomy outlook, Zahidi signaled a positive shift in global cooperation.

 “It is also clear that new forms of global cooperation are already unfolding even amid competition, and the global economy is demonstrating resilience in the face of uncertainty.”

Now in its 21st year, the Global Risks Report highlights a core message: global risks cannot be managed without cooperation.

As competition intensifies, rebuilding trust and new forms of collaboration will be critical, with the report stressing that today’s decisions will shape future outcomes.

The report was released ahead of WEF’s annual meeting, which will be held in Davos from Jan. 19 to 23.