BEIJING: China published its first “green development” index on Tuesday, listing regional governments which promote environmentally friendly development, with Beijing coming out top.
But it came second-to-last in a survey of public satisfaction.
The heavily polluted capital was first in the ranking of 31 provinces and regions for 2016, which was published by the National Bureau of Statistics, followed by Fujian and Zhejiang provinces, while Tibet and Xinjiang were the lowest ranked regions.
Hebei province, which surrounds Beijing and is home to several cities with some of the worst air pollution in the world, was ranked 20th.
President Xi Jinping said in October that fighting pollution was one of China’s key tasks through 2020, and the government has vowed to reduce air pollution across 28 northern cities this winter.
“By measuring overall progress on ecological civilization construction over the last year, the annual evaluation guides all regions to push forward green development, and implement ecological civilization construction,” statistics bureau head Ning Jizhe wrote in a note along with the data release.
The National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Environmental Protection and the Communist Party’s Organization Department jointly published the data with the statistics bureau.
While Beijing was top in the green index, the capital came in 30th out of 31 regions in a separate survey of public satisfaction with the environment published along with the green index data on the statistics bureau website.
Tibet came in first in public satisfaction with the environment.
In explaining the discrepancy, Ning wrote that the two indicators measured different things.
The green index was based on 55 statistical parameters and took into account investment in cleaning up the environment and use of resources, and reflected progress on moving toward a better environment.
China plans to conduct the evaluation annually, Ning said.
Beijing tops China’s first ‘green development’ index, but sinks in public opinion
Beijing tops China’s first ‘green development’ index, but sinks in public opinion
Marine insurance companies are considering canceling, repricing policies in the Middle East
RIYADH: Marine insurance companies are considering canceling or repricing policies in the Middle East, according to the Financial Times
This comes after the US and Israeli strikes on targets inside Iran, followed by missile attacks and retaliatory military actions in several countries in the region.
Marine brokers expect insurance premiums for ships to rise by up to 50 percent, given the region’s classification as a “war zone.”
Ship owners are considering rerouting their vessels to avoid the Strait of Hormuz and reduce risks to crews and cargo.
20% of the global oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz.
Regarding oil prices, a rise is expected as 20 percent of global oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz, amid concerns about continued tensions in the region.
Air traffic in the Middle East was severely disrupted after several countries closed their airspace completely or partially, while regional and international airlines suspended or rescheduled flights.
On the morning of March 1st, the Iranian capital, Tehran, witnessed several large explosions following Israel's announcement of what it described as a “preemptive strike.”
Flights to countries in the region suspended due to attacks
In a video message, US President Donald Trump announced that the US had begun “major combat operations” in Iran, asserting that the goal was to defend the American people by neutralizing what he described as the “imminent threat” from the Iranian regime.
Several regional and international airlines announced the suspension of their flights to some countries in the region due to the attacks.
These military developments come at a time when major shipping companies had already avoided the Red Sea and Suez Canal routes due to security tensions, reverting to the Cape of Good Hope route, which increases shipping costs and puts pressure on global supply chains.
With the closure of airspace in several countries in the region, the risk of disruption to air traffic and trade is increasing, while oil markets are watching closely for any signs of potential supply disruptions from a region that is one of the world's most important energy production hubs.
