Philippine president's war of drugs has popular support, analyst tells Arab News

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte. (Reuters)
Updated 25 November 2017
Follow

Philippine president's war of drugs has popular support, analyst tells Arab News

MANILA: As Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte continues his war on drugs in the face of heavy criticism from the international community, Arab News spoke with political analyst Ramon Casiple to get some insight into Duterte’s motives, and find out how successful his campaign has been.

Duterte promised on the campaign trail that he would eradicate the Philippines’ drug problems if he was elected — “I’ll kill you,” he told drug dealers and users in May 2016 — just as he managed to clean up Davao City when he was mayor there.

But, just as in Davao, reports of unlawful extrajudicial killings have attracted significant criticism of Duterte’s methods.

Casiple said the president is convinced that the cause of most crimes is illegal drugs. “In fact, there are statistics that show that 68 percent of crimes in the country are drug-related,” he said.

Another report suggests that, because of the Duterte administration's relentless campaign against drugs, there has been a significant decrease in crime across the board, especially crimes against property.

“Ironically, there was an increase in murders, but, of course, he is denying that these are extrajudicial killings,” Casiple added.

The president “feels encouraged,” too, by the interest shown by several countries, including Indonesia and the US, in his program’s progress, Casiple suggested.

“They are now seeing that the Philippine government's war on drugs is bearing positive results,” he said. “Even (US President Donald) Trump admitted during their recent talks that he is taking some cues from the Philippines (on dealing with the drug problem).”

Casiple also claimed that Duterte’s campaign “remains popular in general” with the citizens of the Philippines.

And although Duterte has realized his campaign promise to eradicate the Philippines’ drug problem may be impossible, now that he has full access to intelligence reports on the matter, Casiple said, the president remains focused on trying to deliver that promise.

“There is political will on the part of the president. He wants to do his best to address the issue on drugs but he has also realized that he can't completely lick the problem,” said Casiple. “Further, he is bent on fulfilling his campaign promise to bring change to the country. But we first have to achieve peace and order before economic development can set in. That way we can attract investments which will produce jobs, which, in turn,will address the poverty question on a long term basis.”

Casiple said that extrajudicial killings are a violation of human rights and those directly involved can be charged in court, but suggested the president could not be held responsible for the conduct of law enforcement personnel.

“The question is: Does the president have a direct hand on these killings? Or did he create the situation? So far I am not aware of any direct order from the president for our law enforcers to loosen the terms of engagement in the conduct of police operations,” said Casiple.

On the president's recent decision to hand control of the drug war back to the Philippine National Police (PNP), having initially transferred responsibility from the PNP to the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA), Casiple said it poses questions about whether there have been qualitative changes to the policy.

“Remember, it was (originally) removed from the PNP and transferred to the PDEA because of some issues. The first was the killing of a Korean businessman in which the suspects were anti-drug operatives and the second was the killings of three teens in Caloocan City,” he said.

“I dont think there has been a qualitative improvement on the behavior of the police," he continued. “Nothing was changed as far as the anti-drug policy is concerned.”

Casiple did have some advice for the president if he really wants to show the public that he does not condone extrajudicial killings.

“He has to stop giving borderline instructions such as that it's OK for the police to kill and that he will provide them with a lawyer,” Casiple said — although he added that “obviously” what the president meant by such statements is that he will fully support the police’s actions in the line of duty.

 

Greenland crisis boosts Danish apps designed to identify and help boycott US goods

Updated 57 min 54 sec ago
Follow

Greenland crisis boosts Danish apps designed to identify and help boycott US goods

  • Boycott campaigns are usually short-lived and real change often requires an organized effort rather than individual consumers

COPENHAGEN: The makers of mobile apps designed to help shoppers identify and boycott American goods say they saw a surge of interest in Denmark and beyond after the recent flare-up in tensions over US President Donald Trump’s designs on Greenland.
The creator of the “Made O’Meter” app, Ian Rosenfeldt, said he saw around 30,000 downloads of the free app in just three days at the height of the trans-Atlantic diplomatic crisis in late January out of more than 100,000 since it was launched in March.
Apps offer practical help
Rosenfeldt, who lives in Copenhagen and works in digital marketing, decided to create the app a year ago after joining a Facebook group of like-minded Danes hoping to boycott US goods.
“Many people were frustrated and thinking, ‘How do we actually do this in practical terms,’” the 53-year-old recalled. “If you use a bar code scanner, it’s difficult to see if a product is actually American or not, if it’s Danish or not. And if you don’t know that, you can’t really make a conscious choice.”
The latest version of “Made O’Meter” uses artificial intelligence to identify and analyze several products at a time, then recommend similar European-made alternatives. Users can set preferences, like “No USA-owned brands” or “Only EU-based brands.” The app claims over 95 percent accuracy.
“By using artificial intelligence, you can take an image of a product … and it can make a deep dive to go out and find the correct information about the product in many levels,” Rosenfeldt told The Associated Press during a demonstration at a Copenhagen grocery store. “This way, you have information that you can use to take decisions on what you think is right.”
‘Losing an ally’
After an initial surge of downloads when the app was launched, usage tailed off. Until last month, when Trump stepped up his rhetoric about the need for the US to acquire Greenland, a strategically important and mineral-rich Arctic island that is a semiautonomous territory of Denmark.
Usage peaked Jan. 23, when there were almost 40,000 scans in one day, compared with 500 or so daily last summer. It has dropped back since but there were still around 5,000 a day this week, said Rosenfeldt, who noted “Made O’Meter” is used by over 20,000 people in Denmark but also by people in Germany, Spain, Italy, even Venezuela.
“It’s become much more personal,” said Rosenfeldt, who spoke of “losing an ally and a friend.”
Trump announced in January he would slap new tariffs on Denmark and seven other European countries that opposed his takeover calls, only to abruptly drop his threats after he said a “framework” for a deal over access to mineral-rich Greenland was reached with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte’s help. Few details of that agreement have emerged.
The US began technical talks in late January to put together an Arctic security deal with Denmark and Greenland, which say sovereignty is not negotiable.
Rosenfeldt knows such boycotts won’t damage the US economy, but hopes to send a message to supermarkets and encourage greater reliance on European producers.
“Maybe we can send a signal and people will listen and we can make a change,” he added.
The protest may be largely symbolic
Another Danish app, “NonUSA,” topped 100,000 downloads at the beginning of February. One of its creators, 21-year-old Jonas Pipper, said there were over 25,000 downloads Jan. 21, when 526 product scans were performed in a minute at one point. Of the users, some 46,000 are in Denmark and around 10,000 in Germany.
“We noticed some users saying they felt like a little bit of the pressure was lifted off them,” Pipper said. “They feel like they kind of gained the power back in this situation.”
It’s questionable whether such apps will have much practical effect.
Christina Gravert, an associate professor of economics at the University of Copenhagen, said there are actually few US products on Danish grocery store shelves, “around 1 to 3 percent”. Nuts, wines and candy, for example. But there is widespread use of American technology in Denmark, from Apple iPhones to Microsoft Office tools.
“If you really want to have an impact, that’s where you should start,” she said.
Even “Made O’Meter” and “NonUSA” are downloaded from Apple’s App Store and Google’s Play Store.
Gravert, who specializes in behavioral economics, said such boycott campaigns are usually short-lived and real change often requires an organized effort rather than individual consumers.
“It can be interesting for big supermarket brands to say, OK, we’re not going to carry these products anymore because consumers don’t want to buy them,” she said. “If you think about large companies, this might have some type of impact on the import (they) do.”
On a recent morning, shoppers leaving one Copenhagen grocery store were divided.
“We do boycott, but we don’t know all the American goods. So, it’s mostly the well-known trademarks,” said Morten Nielsen, 68, a retired navy officer. “It’s a personal feeling … we feel we do something, I know we are not doing very much.”
“I love America, I love traveling in America,” said 63-year-old retiree Charlotte Fuglsang. “I don’t think we should protest that way.”