LONDON: Ofcom, the British broadcasting regulator, has been accused of giving “global credibility” to Al Jazeera’s Arabic-language news channel.
In a letter to the media watchdog, the UK-based ambassadors of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE and Bahrain complained about Al Jazeera’s Arabic service, which is available in millions of homes across the country.
They argued that by sanctioning Al Jazeera’s English-language service, Ofcom was granting “global credibility” to its Arabic-language channel, which they said was “undoubtedly sympathetic” toward Daesh, according to a report in The Times newspaper.
The letter reportedly argued that Al Jazeera’s Arabic channel benefits from Al Jazeera English’s credibility by association, despite the fact that Al Jazeera Arabic is not licensed or currently regulated in the UK. The letter highlighted that Daesh was referred to as an “organization” rather than a terrorist group by the channel.
Ofcom said there was little it could do, as the Arabic channel was not licensed in the UK, but they had passed on the letter to the relevant authority in Italy, where the channel does hold a license.
“Al Jazeera Arabic is not licensed in the UK, so is not subject to our broadcasting rules,” an Ofcom spokesperson told Arab News.
“But we have passed this letter of complaint to the media regulator in Italy, where the channel holds a license, for urgent consideration.”
The Anti-Terror Quartet (ATQ) — comprising Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt and the UAE — broke off diplomatic relations with Qatar in June, with the closure of Al Jazeera being one of the ATQ’s 13 demands of Doha in the days immediately after the start of the rift.
Al Jazeera did not respond to a request for comment.
British media watchdog accused of giving Al Jazeera ‘global credibility’
British media watchdog accused of giving Al Jazeera ‘global credibility’
AI fuels cyber threats but also offers new defenses, panel tells WEF
- Cyber threats surged in 2025, with Distributed Denial of Service attack records shattered 25 times and a staggering 1,400% rise in incidents involving AI-powered bots incarcerating humans
- Experts agreed that while AI has accelerated new and sophisticated threats, with phishing and impersonation on the rise, it has also improved solutions
DUBAI: Artificial intelligence is making cyberattacks more sophisticated and widespread, but it is also enhancing digital defenses, experts told the World Economic Forum on Wednesday, as they stressed the need for zero-trust systems and robust AI frameworks to reduce vulnerabilities.
Cyber threats surged in 2025, with Distributed Denial of Service attack records shattered 25 times and a staggering 1,400 percent rise in incidents involving AI-powered bots incarcerating humans.
Experts agreed that while AI has accelerated new and sophisticated threats, with phishing and impersonation on the rise, it has also improved solutions.
Michelle Zatlyn, co-founder, president and COO of Cloudflare, pointed to modern solutions organizations can invest in. However, she warned against the digital divide between major financial institutions that have robust cybersecurity measures, and smaller organizations struggling with outdated security solutions.
This divide, she said, necessitates heightened awareness and adaptation to modern security technologies to prevent crises, especially during vulnerable times like weekends.
The panelists stressed international collaboration and intelligence sharing between government agencies, law enforcement and the private sector as the way to tackle cross-border threats and build more resilient societies.
Catherine de Bolle, executive director at Europol, said AI has transformed the policing scene where traditional methods no longer function. She emphasized Europol’s extensive efforts to boost collaboration with the private sector to develop tools to protect the digital ecosystem, enhance crypto tracing and boost financial security.
De Bolle said AI had enhanced the capabilities and outreach of organized crime groups “because it facilitates the business model where you only need a computer and some people who are technically schooled.”
“We predict that in the future, digital crime frauds will be much easier as you gain a lot of money and reach more people without the need of an infrastructure,” she added. Collaboration with the private sector, she said, helps ensure a secure ecosystem that maintains user trust in online platforms.
However, Michael Miebach, CEO of Mastercard, said while AI can help defend against cyberattacks, trust needs to be built first among people to make these technologies fulfill its promises in driving prosperity and growth.
“If we don’t build a trusted layer around these technologies, people will not use it,” he said, pointing out that cyber threats have impacted the geopolitical, societal and corporate aspects of life.
Hatem Dowidar, group CEO of e&, called for more intelligent networks to deploy AI agents that detect and isolate malicious behavior early on to protect digital ecosystems from highly disruptive cyberattacks.
“So you are in some sense more cognizant of malicious hardware being embedded in your system,” he said. However, he warned against the loophole created as more companies implement agentic AI agents that could expose networks. Therefore, he urged the building of zero-trust systems to prevent incursions of new threats coming through these technologies.
He also stressed the need to establish guardrails to monitor AI agents because they are “programmed in plain language and it’s very easy that the programming goes out of context.”
“We never could have relied 100 percent on a human agent to work if there is no supervision and that will hold true for AI,” said Dowidar.
Another challenge the panelists highlighted was the blurred lines between state and non-state actors, with states potentially using organized crime to execute cyber operations.
Europol’s de Bolle said this brings new challenges for traditional policing and necessitates joint efforts across intelligence, defense, and law enforcement sectors.
“State actors are using criminal groups for their own purposes to launch DDoS attacks,” she said, adding that the danger comes from the fact that “states can hide behind and criminals can hide after the state and they don’t have to make the investment because the structure is already there.”
She said such developments make it necessary to think of the future of defense police intelligence services where law enforcement works closely with the private sector to tackle such dangers, while respecting the boundaries of different agencies: “If we do not put the information and intelligence together to tackle this, we will never win the battle.”
Dowidar said information sharing needed to happen on national and international security levels. Nationally, there should be an entity that coordinates between the police, intelligence, network operators and the critical infrastructure companies.
Internationally, there should be security centers that immediately inform other like-minded organizations around the world of any new threat, along with sharing how the problem was solved or whether help is needed from other experts.
Meanwhile, de Bolle said it was the responsibility of the private and public sectors to build societal resilience, boost digital literacy, revamp the education system and develop the critical mindset of the young generation who will use these tools in the future.
Cloudflare’s Zatlyn urged business leaders to understand the basics of new technologies, beyond only relying on technical teams, to keep revenue flowing and minimize risks facing their networks.
She also stressed that CEOs and organizations must consider AI agents as an “extension” of their teams.
“Organizations are concerned that their data will leak with the use of new technologies, but this depends how to train the agents. These are all stoppable issues,” said Zatlyn.









