From boom to bust: crackdown takes toll on Niger smuggling hub

(Courtesy: AFP)
Updated 14 June 2017
Follow

From boom to bust: crackdown takes toll on Niger smuggling hub

NIGER: With tens of thousands of migrants flooding into the desert city of Agadez en route to Europe, Africa’s smuggling capital enjoyed a surge in business which boosted the local economy.
But a government ban on the transportation of migrants has hit business badly, leaving disgruntled locals out of pocket.
“It’s as if you smacked a child without saying what it had done wrong,” explains Issouf Maha, mayor of Tchirozerine, a town in central Niger which lies on the edge of the Sahara, just north of Agadez.
In May 2015, the government in Niamey adopted a law banning the illegal trafficking of migrants with those found guilty facing a prison sentence of between one and 30 years, and fines of up to 30 million CFA francs (45,000 euros/$51,000).
It was only in August 2016 that the government began “rigorously” applying it, Interior Minister Mohamed Bazoum told AFP.
Since then, “more than 100 people smugglers” have been arrested, around a hundred vehicles seized and “nearly 7,000 migrants” brought back to Agadez, Bazoum said, indicating the importance of cracking down on all forms of smuggling.
“All trafficking is interlinked” whether it be in migrants, weapons or drugs, he said.
As a result of the crackdown, both smugglers and fixers have found themselves at a loose end.
But it’s not only them: shops, banks and lorry drivers are also feeling the absence of the thousands of migrants who, despite their extreme poverty, have stimulated the economy in this impoverished desert city that is a key transit point for those heading to Europe.
“Me, I just help one of the fixers. Now the police are calling us ‘accomplices’,” says Achama Akomili, 35, describing the criminalization of an activity which only three months ago was legal.
“Before I was earning a good living. I paid my rent through the migrants and the fixers. With that I could feed my wife and help my family. At the moment, it’s not going well.
“We carry on because there’s no other work. We’ve got no choice. Before I was earning between 30,000-40,000 CFA francs per day (45-60 euros).
“But now, I can go a whole week without earning anything,” he complains.
And one day soon, he himself might have to join “the exodus” heading north, Akomili says.
Taher Soufiane, who has been driving migrants to the border since 2013, is also at a loose end after being arrested on the road with around 20 people in the back of his pick-up truck.
“We didn’t know it was forbidden,” says this 29-year-old father-of-three.
After several days in jail, he appeared before a judge and was released. But he’s not clear whether it’s a provisional release before a trial or whether he’s been handed a suspended sentence.
“They just told me that if I do it again, I will go to prison for a long time. They took my car and my work and now I just sit around all day,” he complains.
“Why is Europe banning this without giving us anything?“
In the market, trader Issouf Halidou says he too has seen his business hit by the crackdown on people smuggling.
“I’m not selling anything any more. Business is at a standstill,” he grumbles.
His stall is packed with all the paraphernalia sought by migrants taking the long desert journey north: for 500 CFA francs (75 centimes, 85 cents), you can buy a small water bottle, gloves, a balaclava and sunglasses.
For a little more, there is also food: milk for about 2.0 euros, cassava for 1.50 and sugar for 90 centimes. But now he doesn’t know what to do with his stock.
The banks are also quiet, the walls covered with ads for money transfer services — MoneyGram, Western Union, Allzza and others — giving just a brief glimpse of multiple transfers they once handled.
“Before there was always a queue in front of the banks. There might be more than 300 migrants a day going into a branch! Today there’s no one or nearly no one,” said one bank employee, speaking on condition of anonymity.
“It’s hard to know exactly what the shortfall is but there’s definitely an impact, that’s for sure. It’s a loss for the region,” he told AFP, saying the banks would likely start making staff redundant if the ban wasn’t lifted.
The government is aware of the problems.
“The criticism is well founded,” admits Interior Minister Bazoum.
“Taking into account the scope of trafficking in illegal migrants, a whole economy grew up around it which provided a living for many people.
“There is a need and we have committed to developing an alternative to this criminal economy.”
Backed by Europe, Niger embarked on a 460-million-euro program to address “all spheres of activity,” Bazoum said, indicating that it would address both economic and security issues.
But not much of it is likely to make an impact in Agadez.
“When are we going to see the money that Europe has given? There are all these meetings but there’s never anything for us. We have women and children to feed and we’re waiting,” complained Abdoulaye Alora, a 45-year-old fixer.
For the Tchirozerine mayor, the fear is that the ban on transporting migrants will push those desperate for work into the arms of other criminal groups, such as those trading in cocaine, weapons or stolen cars.
One observer dismissed the European support as meaningless in the effort to cut back migrant flows.
“We should be treating the symptoms and not the causes. As long as there’s more than 50 percent unemployment among young people in African countries, there will be migrants traveling through Agadez and other places.”


Bangladesh halts controversial relocation of Rohingya refugees to remote island

Updated 29 December 2025
Follow

Bangladesh halts controversial relocation of Rohingya refugees to remote island

  • Administration of ousted PM Sheikh Hasina spent about $350m on the project
  • Rohingya refuse to move to island and 10,000 have fled, top refugee official says

DHAKA: When Bangladesh launched a multi-million-dollar project to relocate Rohingya refugees to a remote island, it promised a better life. Five years on, the controversial plan has stalled, as authorities find it is unsustainable and refugees flee back to overcrowded mainland camps.

The Bhasan Char island emerged naturally from river sediments some 20 years ago. It lies in the Bay of Bengal, over 60 km from Bangladesh’s mainland.

Never inhabited, the 40 sq. km area was developed to accommodate 100,000 Rohingya refugees from the cramped camps of the coastal Cox’s Bazar district.

Relocation to the island started in early December 2020, despite protests from the UN and humanitarian organizations, which warned that it was vulnerable to cyclones and flooding, and that its isolation restricted access to emergency services.

Over 1,600 people were then moved to Bhasan Char by the Bangladesh Navy, followed by another 1,800 the same month. During 25 such transfers, more than 38,000 refugees were resettled on the island by October 2024.

The relocation project was spearheaded by the government of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who was ousted last year. The new administration has since suspended it indefinitely.

“The Bangladesh government will not conduct any further relocation of the Rohingya to Bhasan Char island. The main reason is that the country’s present government considers the project not viable,” Mizanur Rahman, refugee relief and repatriation commissioner in Cox’s Bazar, told Arab News on Sunday.

The government’s decision was prompted by data from UN agencies, which showed that operations on Bhasan Char involved 30 percent higher costs compared with the mainland camps in Cox’s Bazar, Rahman said.

“On the other hand, the Rohingya are not voluntarily coming forward for relocation to the island. Many of those previously relocated have fled ... Around 29,000 are currently living on the island, while about 10,000 have returned to Cox’s Bazar on their own.”

A mostly Muslim ethnic minority, the Rohingya have lived for centuries in Myanmar’s western Rakhine state but were stripped of their citizenship in the 1980s and have faced systemic persecution ever since.

In 2017 alone, some 750,000 of them crossed to neighboring Bangladesh, fleeing a deadly crackdown by Myanmar’s military. Today, about 1.3 million of them shelter in 33 camps in the coastal Cox’s Bazar district, making it the world’s largest refugee settlement.

Bhasan Char, where the Bangladeshi government spent an estimated $350 million to construct concrete residential buildings, cyclone shelters, roads, freshwater systems, and other infrastructure, offered better living conditions than the squalid camps.

But there was no regular transport service to the island, its inhabitants were not allowed to travel freely, and livelihood opportunities were few and dependent on aid coming from the mainland.

Rahman said: “Considering all aspects, we can say that Rohingya relocation to Bhasan Char is currently halted. Following the fall of Sheikh Hasina’s regime, only one batch of Rohingya was relocated to the island.

“The relocation was conducted with government funding, but the government is no longer allowing any funds for this purpose.”

“The Bangladeshi government has spent around $350 million on it from its own funds ... It seems the project has not turned out to be successful.”