War on Daesh: Pentagon enjoying greater freedom under Trump

1 / 2
US President Donald Trump with Defense Secretary James Mattis during a recent meeting at the White House in Washington. (Reuters)
2 / 2
This March 27, 2008 file photo, shows the Pentagon in Washington. (AP)
Updated 27 March 2017
Follow

War on Daesh: Pentagon enjoying greater freedom under Trump

WASHINGTON: The Pentagon under US President Donald Trump is enjoying greater freedom to run its wars the way it wants — and not constantly seek White House approval on important decisions.
Many in the military appreciate this increased autonomy, but critics charge it is raising civilian death rates, puts the lives of US troops at greater risk and leads to a lack of oversight of America’s conflicts.
Nowhere has the shift been more visible than in the fight against the Daesh in northern Syria, where under former President Barack Obama even minor tweaks to US plans underwent exhaustive White House scrutiny.
Since Trump’s inauguration, the Marine Corps has brought an artillery battery into Syria, and the army has flowed in hundreds of Rangers, bringing the total number of US forces there to almost 1,000.
Commanders are weighing the possibility of deploying hundreds more, and the Pentagon this week announced it had provided artillery support and choppered local forces behind enemy lines in a bid to seize a strategic dam.
The greater leeway marks a departure for the National Security Council (NSC), which coordinates foreign and military policy and implements the president’s national security agenda.
Under Obama, the NSC oversaw just about every aspect of America’s wars in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, with then Pentagon chief Ash Carter was kept on a short leash.
Trump, conversely, has repeatedly deferred to his Defense Secretary, Jim Mattis, on military moves.
Mattis, a retired general, has delegated expanded authorities to his battlefield commanders.
“Jim Mattis has been given the latitude to conduct military operations in the way he sees best,” said Chris Sherwood, Pentagon spokesman.
The US is fighting Daesh in Iraq and Syria and the Taliban in Afghanistan “by, with and through” local forces backed by US and allied air power.
That overall strategy has not changed, but commanders now have greater discretion to move troops and equipment around.
Troop increases were especially sensitive for Obama, who campaigned on a promise to end America’s Middle East wars and not put US boots on the ground.
Sen. John McCain, who heads the US Senate Armed Services Committee, was a frequent critic of what he calls NSC micromanagement.
The veteran lawmaker said he favors battlefield commanders getting greater latitude.
“We do no have to ask the 30-something-year-olds for permission to respond to an attack in Afghanistan,” he said.
McCain’s congressional counterpart Mac Thornberry described a visit he made to Afghanistan under Obama, when he overheard a call from an NSC staffer asking how much fuel was in the planes on the tarmac.
“The level of micromanagement was incredible, and of course by the time you work your way through the NSC process your target has moved,” he said.
Observers are also calling into question whether the Pentagon is allowing civilian casualties to mount.
Military officials vehemently deny this and stress that civilian safety is a top priority in approving any strike.
Airwars, a London-based collective of journalists and researchers, said Friday it had become so overwhelmed tracking civilian deaths allegedly caused by US and coalition planes that it has stopped tracking Russian strikes.
“The decision to temporarily suspend our Russia strike assessments has been a very difficult one to take,” Airwars director Chris Woods said.
“Moscow is still reportedly killing hundreds of civilians in Syria every month. But with coalition casualty claims escalating so steeply we believe our key focus at present needs to be on the US-led alliance.”
Gen. Thomas Waldhauser, who heads the US Africa Command, said on Friday he hopes the White House will loosen restrictions for operations in Somalia, where the US is targeting militants.
“It allows us to prosecute targets in a more rapid fashion,” he said, stressing new authorities would not come at the expense of civilians.
“The cardinal rule in these types of engagements is to not make more enemies than you already have,” Waldhauser said. “We are not going to turn Somalia into a free-fire zone.”


Cuba says attacking speedboat had nearly 13,000 rounds of ammunition

Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Cuba says attacking speedboat had nearly 13,000 rounds of ammunition

  • Firefight took place at a range of 20 meters, Cuba says
  • Incoming crew originally ‌set out on two vessels but ditched one
HAVANA: A commando of Cuban exiles who intended to infiltrate Cuba on a speedboat was armed with nearly 13,000 rounds of ammunition, 13 rifles and 11 pistols, Cuban officials said on Friday, providing new details about Wednesday’s deadly exchange of gunfire at sea. The government in Havana has said 10 Cuban nationals coming from the United States entered Cuban waters and opened fire on a border guard vessel, leading Cuban forces to return fire killing four and wounding six others, who were taken into custody.
In an attempt to dispel doubts about its account to date, senior Cuban Interior Ministry officers displayed the captured armaments from the studio on a special television program, including bins full of at least some of the 12,846 recovered rounds. They also showed pictures of the vessels, each peppered with bullet holes from ‌the firefight they ‌said took place at a range of 20 meters (66 feet).
The confrontation took place ‌at ⁠a fraught moment ⁠in US-Cuban relations, with US President Donald Trump pressuring the island by imposing a virtual oil blockade after capturing and ousting Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, a crucial Cuban ally, on January 3.
Cuba has identified the assailants as Cuban exiles, some of whom had been previously placed on a list of accused terrorists, who came from the United States with the intent to sow chaos and attack military units on the Communist-ruled island.
“The intent of this group is to infiltrate, to promote public disorder. To incite the people to unite. To carry out something violent. Attack military units ⁠in order to incite social unrest and to unite the people in order to ‌steal the revolution. That has been duly proven,” said Col. Victor Alvarez ‌of the Interior Ministry.
Cuba says response ‘proportional’
US politicians have expressed skepticism over Cuba’s version of events. Secretary of State Marco ‌Rubio on Wednesday said his government would independently investigate, adding that it was not a US operation and ‌that no US government personnel were involved.
Cuban officers said the infiltrators set out from Marathon in the Florida Keys on two vessels but ditched one at some point due to technical difficulties. They united on one speedboat, which a US official said was reported stolen in Florida. Cuba said it recovered a drone, radios, knives, a portable power plant, bolt cutters and ‌other materiel. They also found emblems of the November 30th Movement and People’s Self-Defense, anti-communist groups that oppose the Cuban government.
Cuba says a patrol of five ⁠border guard members on ⁠a 9-meter boat spotted the incoming vessel shortly after 7 a.m., with some members of the incoming crew in the water, about one nautical mile off a cay on the Caribbean island’s northern coast, about 100 miles (160 km) from Marathon.
The infiltrators opened fire at a distance of 185 meters, striking the captain of the Cuban vessel in the abdomen, Cuba said. Bleeding heavily, the wounded captain remained at the helm and steered toward the enemy vessel, leading to a firefight at a distance of about 20 meters, the officers said.
Cuba called its response “proportional.”
“It is a defensive model that practically never uses firearms, and the use of firearms is proportional to the type of action being carried out against our force,” said Interior Ministry Col. Ybey Carballo.
The captured Cuban nationals were receiving medical care and face charges including armed aggression, illegal entry into national territory, crimes associated with terrorist acts, and arms trafficking, prosecutor Edward Robert Campbell told the program. He said they face prison terms of up to 10 to 15 years for the lesser offenses and 20 to 30 years — or even the death penalty — for the more serious charges.