$50k for a few hours’ work? Backlash begins against ‘greedy’ Gulf influencers

BPG Cohn & Wolfe
Updated 13 December 2016
Follow

$50k for a few hours’ work? Backlash begins against ‘greedy’ Gulf influencers

LONDON: Taghreed Oraibi could not quite believe it when she received a quote from a social media “influencer” a few weeks ago.
The Dubai-based public relations director works with many bloggers, Instagram users and Snapchat stars, whom big brands are increasingly targeting as a way to promote their products.
In a country like the UAE, paid influencers typically command fees of between $1,000 (SR3,750) and $5,000 to write a single social media post, Oraibi said.
But even she was surprised upon receiving a quote from one influencer asking for a cool AED175,000 — that’s almost $50,000 or SR180,000 — for what would have been “a couple of hours” of work.
“There is an element of greediness in this,” Oraibi, who works for PR firm BPG Cohn & Wolfe in Dubai, told Arab News.
“This money does not justify what they do, to be honest. I mean, $5,000 for one Instagram post?” 

Product trial
The trend in brands using social media influencers has been growing in the Gulf region for some time. But the fees commanded by some are getting out of hand, the PR expert said.
Oraibi declined to name the influencer who had sent her the AED 175,000 quote.
But the asking fee, she said, was for attending an event, doing a product trial, and then doing two Snapchat uploads and four Instagram posts.
“The whole concept of the $5,000 post is just not sinking in. But I think the highest (quote) I received is the Dh175,000,” said Oraibi. “That would be the most ridiculous thing I’ve received so far.”
But it’s a free market. And many brands clearly see the value in using influencers to flog their wares. As with generally costlier celebrity endorsements, brands hope that consumers will rush out and buy if, say, their favorite beauty blogger or Facebook fashion writer endorses a particular product. And so paying $5,000 for a post on an influencer’s Instagram feed could, theoretically, make good business sense.
There is certainly evidence that using influencers works. A recent BPG Cohn & Wolfe survey of 1,000 UAE residents — which was led by Oraibi and conducted with YouGov — found that the majority of respondents are more likely to buy fashion and beauty products based on what influencers say.
“There was an increased usage of influencers in the region. And the purpose of the study that we did was to just validate whether the money marketeers and our clients is investing is going in the right direction or not. Because thousands and millions of dirhams were put into using influencers,” said Oraibi.
But the costs charged by these social-media bigshots are still often incommensurate with the work they put in, Oraibi added.

Lot of effort
“Sometimes the PR agency is responsible for creating the content, and doing basically 80 percent of the work. And then all (the influencer has) to do is just post a photo and a caption,” she said.
“Charging that amount of money for such a task is ridiculous. Yes I understand that, sometimes, bloggers incur a lot of effort and time and expenses in creating content. And these are the ones who I would accept paying this amount of money for.”
Maurice Hamilton, CEO of The SMC Group, an agency that specializes in celebrity and digital influencer endorsements, says that his company helps negotiate prices for influencer endorsements.
“Pricing is typically based on what brands are prepared to pay, the clever ones are utilising expert negotiators like us,” he said.
“Guidelines are important but pricing is very much an individual thing. Ballparks based on the scope of work, are what we typically advise our clients on.”
One issue surrounding influencers is that many in the Arabian Gulf region do not actually declare when they are being paid to post. But Hamilton said it is important that influencers are transparent about this.
“I think it’s important for influencers to inform their audience when they’ve been contracted to promote something. Posting a small tag or ‘paid advertising’ credit could assist in informing the audience,” he said.
Yet others believe that greater transparency would create problems given what influencers are supposed to stand for.
Harris Breslow, an associate professor in the Department of Mass Communication at the American University of Sharjah, says that influencers face the danger of being deserted by their audiences if they are discovered as paid advocates of brands.
“I’m not sure that transparency would help. In many situations influencers are valued precisely for their authenticity and the lack of fees that they charge. This is true of travel and foodie influencers, for example… charging a fee tends to change the influencer’s status in the eyes of his or her target audience, and particularly with millennials. It is the authenticity that creates the value to the influencer, not what he or she can charge,” Breslow said.

Fashion events
“There are exceptions — both in terms of individuals and in terms of influencer types. Fashion influencers, for example, tend to be forgiven their tendency to charge for appearances, as it’s understood that fashion events are always already commercial.”
Oraibi says that part of the reason the fees charged by influencers are “getting out of control” is that the field is relatively new, and unregulated. But having more established fees and disclosure guidelines would be a good start, she added.
As for the AED 175,000 quote, Oraibi says they are “pushing back” at that.
“I definitely agree that it’s a supply and demand thing. And if brands put their foot down and stop paying these ridiculous amounts of money, then I think we will at least take a first step into finding a solution,” she said.
“Outsiders are accusing us of creating monsters,” she added.
“Yes, some (influencers) are difficult and challenging to work with; some of them are lovely and very professional. So no, I don’t think they’re monsters. I just think there is no direction or regulation in this industry.”


EU bans 4 more Russian media outlets from broadcasting in the bloc, citing disinformation

Updated 18 May 2024
Follow

EU bans 4 more Russian media outlets from broadcasting in the bloc, citing disinformation

  • The EU has already suspended Russia Today and Sputnik among several other outlets since February 2022

BRUSSELS: The European Union on Friday banned four more Russian media outlets from broadcasting in the 27-nation bloc for what it calls the spread of propaganda about the invasion of Ukraine and disinformation as the EU heads into parliamentary elections in three weeks.
The latest batch of broadcasters consists of Voice of Europe, RIA Novosti, Izvestia and Rossiyskaya Gazeta, which the EU claims are all under control of the Kremlin. It said in a statement that the four are in particular targeting “European political parties, especially during election periods.”
Belgium already last month opened an investigation into suspected Russian interference in June’s Europe-wide elections, saying its country’s intelligence service has confirmed the existence of a network trying to undermine support for Ukraine.
The Czech government has imposed sanctions on a number of people after a pro-Russian influence operation was uncovered there. They are alleged to have approached members of the European Parliament and offered them money to promote Russian propaganda.
Since the war started in February 2022, the EU has already suspended Russia Today and Sputnik among several other outlets.

 

 


Israeli soldiers post abusive videos despite army’s pledge to act: BBC analysis

Updated 17 May 2024
Follow

Israeli soldiers post abusive videos despite army’s pledge to act: BBC analysis

  • The BBC analyzed 45 photos and videos posted online by Israeli soldiers that showed Palestinian prisoners in the West Bank being abused and humiliated

LONDON: Israeli soldiers continue to post videos of abuse against Palestinian detainees despite a military pledge to take action against the perpetrators, analysis by the BBC has found.

The broadcaster said it had analyzed 45 photos and videos posted online by Israeli soldiers that showed Palestinian prisoners in the West Bank being abused and humiliated. Some were draped in Israeli flags. 

Experts say the footage and images, which showed Palestinians being stripped, beaten and blindfolded, could breach international law and amount to a war crime.

The Israel Defense Forces said some soldiers had been disciplined or suspended for “unacceptable behavior” but did not comment on the individual cases identified by the BBC.

The most recent investigation into social media misconduct by Israeli soldiers follows a previous inquiry in which BBC Verify confirmed Israeli soldiers had filmed Gazan detainees while beating them and then posted the material on social platforms.

The Israeli military has carried out arbitrary arrests across Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, since the Hamas attack on Oct. 7. The number of Palestinian prisoners in the West Bank has since risen to more than 7,060 according to the Commission of Detainees’ Affairs and the Palestinian Prisoner Society.

Ori Givati, spokesperson for Breaking the Silence, a non-governmental organization for Israeli veterans working to expose wrongdoing in the IDF, told the BBC he was “far from shocked” to hear the misconduct was ongoing.

Blaming “current far-right political rhetoric in the country” for further encouraging the abuse, he added: “There are no repercussions. They [Israeli soldiers] get encouraged and supported by the highest ministers of the government.”

He said this played into a mindset already subscribed to by the military: “The culture in the military, when it comes to Palestinians, is that they are only targets. They are not human beings. This is how the military teaches you to behave.”

The BBC’s analysis found that the videos and photos it examined were posted by 11 soldiers of the Kfir Brigade, the largest infantry brigade in the IDF. None of them hid their identity.

The IDF did not respond when the BBC asked about the actions of the individual soldiers and whether they had been disciplined.

The BBC also attempted to contact the soldiers on social media. The organization was blocked by one, while none of the others responded.

Mark Ellis, executive director of the International Bar Association, urged an investigation into the incidents shown in the footage and called for the IDF to discipline those involved.

In response to the BBC’s investigation, the IDF said: “The IDF holds its soldiers to a professional standard … and investigates when behavior is not in line with the IDF’s values. In the event of unacceptable behavior, soldiers were disciplined and even suspended from reserve duty.

“Additionally, soldiers are instructed to avoid uploading footage of operational activities to social media networks.”

However, it did not acknowledge its pledge to act on BBC Verify’s earlier findings in Gaza, according to the broadcaster.


4 journalists killed in Gaza as death toll climbs above 100

Updated 17 May 2024
Follow

4 journalists killed in Gaza as death toll climbs above 100

  • 104 Palestinian media workers reported dead, along with 3 Lebanese and 2 Israelis

LONDON: The Gaza Media Authority on Thursday said that four journalists had been killed in an Israeli airstrike, bringing the total number of journalists killed in the conflict to more than 100.

The victims were identified as Hail Al-Najjar, a video editor at the Al-Aqsa Media Network; Mahmoud Jahjouh, a photojournalist at the Palestine Post website; Moath Mustafa Al-Ghefari, a photojournalist at the Kanaan Land website and Palestinian Media Foundation; and Amina Mahmoud Hameed, a program presenter and editor at several media outlets, according to the Anadolu Agency.

The Gaza Media Office said the four were killed in an Israeli airstrike, but did not provide additional details on the circumstances surrounding their deaths.

A total of 104 Palestinian journalists have been killed since the conflict began on Oct. 7. Two Israeli and three Lebanese media workers also have been killed.

The latest loss adds to the already heavy toll on media workers, with the Committee to Protect Journalists saying the Gaza conflict is the deadliest for journalists and media workers since it began keeping records.

Israel is continuing its offensive on Gaza despite a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire.

On Thursday, South Africa, which has brought a case accusing Israel of genocide to the International Court of Justice, urged the court to order Israel to halt its assault on Rafah.

According to Gaza medical authorities, more than 35,200 Palestinians have been killed, mostly women and children, and over 79,200 have been injured since early October when Israel launched its offensive following an attack by Hamas.


Russia outlaws SOTA opposition news outlet

Updated 17 May 2024
Follow

Russia outlaws SOTA opposition news outlet

  • Authorities said outlet tries to destabilize the socio-political situation in Russia
  • Move could criminalize SOTA content and puts its reporters at risk of arrest

LONDON: Russia declared opposition media outlet SOTA “undesirable” on Thursday, a move that could criminalize the sharing of its content and put its reporters at risk of arrest.
Authorities in Russia have declared dozens of news outlets, think tanks and non-profit organizations “undesirable” since 2015, a label rights groups say is designed to deter dissent.
In a statement, Russia’s Prosecutor General accused SOTA of “frank attempts to destabilize the socio-political situation in Russia” and “create tension and irritation in society.”
“Such activities, obviously encouraged by so-called Western inspirers, have the goal of undermining the spiritual and moral foundations of Russian society,” it said.
It also accused SOTA of co-operating with TV Rain and The Insider, two other independent Russian-language outlets based outside of the country that are linked to the opposition.
SOTA Project, which covers opposition protests and has been fiercely critical of the Kremlin, denied it had anything to do with TV Rain and The Insider and rejected the claims.
But it advised its followers in Russia to “remove reposts and links” to its materials to avoid the risk of prosecution. SOTA’s Telegram channel has around 137,000 subscribers.
“Law enforcement and courts consider publishing online to be a continuing offense. This means that you can be prosecuted for reposts from 2023, 2022, 2021,” it said.
SOTA Project was born out of a split with a separate news outlet called SOTAvision, which still covers the opposition but distanced itself from the prosecutors’ ruling on Thursday.
Since launching its offensive in Ukraine, Moscow has waged an unprecedented crackdown on dissent that rights groups have likened to Soviet-era mass repression.
Among other organizations labelled as “undesirable” in Russia are the World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace, Transparency International and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.


OpenAI strikes deal to bring Reddit content to ChatGPT

Updated 17 May 2024
Follow

OpenAI strikes deal to bring Reddit content to ChatGPT

  • Deal underscores Reddit’s attempt to diversify beyond its advertising business
  • Content will be used to train AI models

LONDON: Reddit has partnered with OpenAI to bring its content to popular chatbot ChatGPT, the companies said on Thursday, sending the social media platform’s shares up 12 percent in extended trade.
The deal underscores Reddit’s attempt to diversify beyond its advertising business, and follows its recent partnership with Alphabet to make its content available for training Google’s AI models.
ChatGPT and other OpenAI products will use Reddit’s application programming interface, the means by which Reddit distributes its content, following the new partnership.
OpenAI will also become a Reddit advertising partner, the company said.
Ahead of Reddit’s March IPO, Reuters reported that Reddit struck its deal with Alphabet, worth about $60 million per year.
Investors view selling its data to train AI models as a key source of revenue beyond Reddit’s advertising business.
The social media company earlier this month reported strong revenue growth and improving profitability in the first earnings since its market debut, indicating that its Google deal and its push to grow its ads business were paying off.
Reddit’s shares rose 10.5 percent to $62.31 after the bell. As of Wednesday’s close, the stock is up nearly 12 percent since its market debut in March.