How Abu Ghraib became a byword for the disastrous occupation of Iraq

1 / 2
The evidence of the torture and humiliation of Iraqis swelled the ranks of militant groups and fueled the insurgency in the country. (Alamy Stock Photos)
2 / 2
The evidence of the torture and humiliation of Iraqis swelled the ranks of militant groups and fueled the insurgency in the country. (Getty Images)
Short Url
Updated 15 March 2021
Follow

How Abu Ghraib became a byword for the disastrous occupation of Iraq

  • Some 30 years after the launch of Desert Storm, the world is still assessing the manifold consequences of the Gulf War
  • Torture at Abu Ghraib came to symbolize everything the US did wrong after the overthrow of Saddam in 2003

MISSOURI, USA: On Aug. 2, 1990, the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein ordered his army to invade and capture Kuwait. This ill-fated decision forever changed Iraq and the lives of all Iraqis and the first coalition war against Iraqi began on Jan. 16, 1991.

Some 30 years later, we are still assessing the consequences of the invasion of Kuwait. As part of its special coverage of the Gulf War, Arab News has done a deep dive into the topic to produce a multimedia feature titled Desert Storm: 30 years on.

Iraq between 1991 and 2003 suffered tremendously under international sanctions. Although the “Oil for food” UN program was designed to make sure no Iraqis went hungry under the sanctions, Saddam’s regime prevented food and medicine from reaching dissident populations still under his control (particularly Shiites).

As a result, some 500,000 Iraqi children are estimated to have died preventable deaths during this period. The brutal dictatorship that terrorized all Iraqis finally fell in the 2003 installment of the Gulf War. For a brief moment it seemed life would get better for the citizens of a country with one of the world’s largest proven oil reserves.

The successful coalition military campaign quickly degenerated, however, into a disastrous occupation. One event in particular came to symbolize everything the Americans did wrong in their occupation of Iraq: the scandal surrounding American treatment of Iraqi prisoners in the infamous Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad.

First came the very fact that the Americans chose the Abu Ghraib prison to house close to 4,000 prisoners (mostly Sunni Arabs suspected of participating in the post-2003 insurgency against the coalition occupation regime). Abu Ghraib had been infamous during Saddam’s reign, akin to Iran’s Evin prison in Tehran. Long before 2003, “getting sent to Abu Ghraib” stood out as one of the worst fates someone could face in Iraq.

Follow our special coverage of Iraq

Instead of assuaging already suspicious Iraqis and reassuring them that post-Saddam Iraq would be different, the Americans simply took over Abu Ghraib and began using it much as Saddam had. Coalition forces likewise installed themselves in Saddam’s palaces (including the “Green Zone” in Baghdad), turning them into their new administrative headquarters for the occupation.

For many Iraqis, the message seemed clear: The Americans were the new Saddam, except this time Sunnis would take the place of Shiites and Kurds as Iraq’s oppressed groups. Just in case anyone remained unsure about Iraq’s new dictators, the Abu Ghraib scandal broke in April of 2004.




The evidence of the torture and humiliation of Iraqis swelled the ranks of militant groups and fueled the insurgency in the country. (Alamy Stock Photos)

It began with the death of an Iraqi detainee being interrogated at the prison. Soon after, a US soldier discovered a CD-ROM disc in the prison with photos of prisoner abuse. He reported this to his superiors, who began an investigation (as is standard operating procedure for such reports).

The news program “60 Minutes” soon obtained the graphic photos of detainees being tortured by their American guards and broadcast a story on the matter.

The photos of the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib shocked the world. CNN summarized the types of abuse as follows:

  • Punching, slapping and kicking detainees; jumping on their naked feet.
  • Videotaping and photographing naked male and female detainees.
  • Forcibly arranging detainees in various explicit positions for photographing.
  • Forcing detainees to remove their clothing and keeping them naked for several days at a time.
  • Forcing naked male detainees to wear women’s underwear.
  • Photographing and videotaping groups of male detainees in humiliating acts.
  • Arranging naked male detainees in a pile and then jumping on them.
  • Positioning a naked detainee on a box, with a sandbag on his head, and attaching wires to his fingers, toes and other extremities to simulate electric torture.
  • Writing “I am a Rapest (sic)” on the leg of a detainee accused of rape, and then photographing him naked.
  • Placing a dog chain or strap around a naked detainee’s neck and having a female soldier pose for a picture.
  • A male military police guard violating a female detainee.
  • Using military working dogs (without muzzles) to intimidate and frighten detainees, and in at least one case biting and severely injuring a detainee.
  • Taking photographs of dead Iraqi detainees.

Although most people think of Iraq as a very hot country, much of this torture occurred in December 2003 — when temperatures in an unheated prison get quite cold and damp. Keeping the prisoners naked under such conditions, in addition to various forms of humiliation, stress positions, sleep deprivation, cold-water, high-pressure hoses, physical abuse and psychological abuse, certainly amounted to torture.

By early May of 2004, George W. Bush, then US president, appeared before news cameras around the world disavowing the abuse of prisoners and his regret “for the humiliation suffered.” The damage had already been done, however, as the evidence of torture and humiliation of Iraqis swelled the ranks of militant groups and fueled the insurgency in the country.




Former US President George W. Bush
​​​​​

If the torture of prisoners in Abu Ghraib was intended to save coalition lives by forcing prisoners to divulge information about the Iraqi insurgents, it had very much the opposite effect. Responsibility for the whole sorry episode never ended up reaching very high up the American chain of command.

Although Donald Rumsfeld, who was secretary of defense at the time, testified before the US Congress and Senate, neither he nor President Bush or Vice-President Cheney were ever really blamed.

The narrative that emerged instead was one of a few “bad apples” on the night guard shift at Abu Ghraib. Low-level soldiers and civilian contractors received demotions, reprimands and prison sentences of a few months. The highest official sanctioned for the abuse was Janis Karpinski, the brigadier general in charge of several prisons in Iraq. She was rotated out of Iraq and demoted to colonel.

Follow our special coverage of Iraq

For a country that prides itself on its human-rights standards and frequently chides foreign leaders from a moral high ground, this looked like a hypocritical outcome. Many thought it unlikely that higher level officers and government officials did not know what was going on in Abu Ghraib prison.

At the very least, President Bush, Vice-President Cheney and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld created the kind of standard operating procedures and climate that allowed Abu Ghraib to occur. They insisted on calling captured militants “enemy combatants” rather than “prisoners of war” so that they could send them to Guantanamo Bay without formal charges or Geneva Convention protections.




Former US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
 

On other occasions they sent the captured fighters on secret flights to Egypt or secret CIA detention centers in Eastern Europe so they could be tortured there, far from the light of the world. They engaged in various forms of sophistry to classify things like water boarding “enhanced interrogation” rather than torture.

In the end, all of this hurt rather than helped the American cause. Such abuses gave the insurgents in Iraq the oxygen they needed to survive several more years than they should have. Some of the insurgents even eventually morphed into the self-proclaimed Islamic State or Daesh.

To be certain, some of the outcomes from Saddam’s 1990 blunder turned out for the better. Iraqi Kurds in particular found an opportunity to emerge from the ashes of Saddam’s genocidal policies against them in the 1980s.

The unacceptable risk that Saddam’s nuclear weapons program would have posed to the world — a program which was just a few years short of completion in 1990 — receded. However, as with almost all watershed moments in a country’s historical trajectory, the positive changes found themselves weighed down by the bad.

 

David Romano is Thomas G. Strong Professor of Middle East Politics at Missouri State University

Desert Storm: 30 years on
The end of the Gulf War on Feb. 28, 1991 saw the eviction of Iraq from Kuwait but paved the way for decades of conflict

Enter


keywords

Hamas prepares response to Gaza truce offer

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Hamas prepares response to Gaza truce offer

JERUSALEM: Hamas was studying Tuesday Israel’s offer of a 40-day truce in the war in the Gaza Strip in exchange for the release of scores of hostages held since the Palestinian militant group’s October 7 attacks.
Returning to Qatar after the latest talks in Cairo, the Hamas delegation said it would “discuss the ideas and the proposal... we are keen to respond as quickly as possible,” a Hamas source told AFP on condition of anonymity.
Egyptian sources told Al-Qahera News, a site linked to Egyptian intelligence services, that the Hamas delegation would “return with a written response.”
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken described the truce terms as “extraordinarily generous,” while the White House asked fellow mediators Egypt and Qatar to increase pressure on Hamas to accept the latest push to halt the nearly seven-month-old war.
According to Monday night call readouts, US President Joe Biden urged the Egyptian and Qatari leaders “to exert all efforts to secure the release of hostages held by Hamas,” calling this “the only obstacle” to securing relief for civilians in the besieged strip.
For months, Egypt, Qatar and the United States have been trying to secure a new agreement between the combatants. A one-week truce in November saw 80 Israeli hostages exchanged for 240 Palestinians held in Israeli prisons.
Relentless Israeli bombardment has meanwhile devastated Hamas-run Gaza, flattening much of the territory and bringing its people to the brink of famine, while threatening to unfurl into a wider regional conflict.
In the far southern city of Rafah, Palestinians despaired over the war while searching for victims of the latest strike.
“Civilian individuals with no ties to Hamas or any other group were struck by a rocket, torn apart,” Um Louay Masri said at a destroyed building where children were being pulled out from underneath the rubble. “Why did this occur?“
To global alarm, Israel has vowed to go after Hamas battalions in Rafah, where the majority of Gaza’s 2.4 million people have sought refuge.
But Foreign Minister Israel Katz said over the weekend the government may “suspend” that operation if a truce is reached.

Blinken’s Mideast tour
Speaking in Riyadh on his seventh visit to the region since the start of the war in Gaza, top US diplomat Blinken underscored the need for Hamas to “decide quickly” on the truce.
He told a World Economic Forum special meeting that he was “hopeful that they will make the right decision.”
At the WEF meeting, Egypt’s Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry said “the proposal has taken into account the positions of both sides.”
“We are hopeful,” he added.
British Foreign Secretary David Cameron said that Hamas has been offered a “sustained 40 days’ ceasefire, the release of potentially thousands of Palestinian prisoners, in return for the release of these hostages.”
On the sidelines of the WEF, US, European and Arab representatives met to discuss how to advance a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan told the gathering that tangible and irreversible steps toward establishing a Palestinian state would be an essential component of any durable ceasefire deal.
To incentivise Israel to support a Palestinian state, Washington has pushed the prospect of normalized Israel-Saudi relations, with Blinken suggesting Monday that some progress was being made in that arena.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is a long-standing opponent of Palestinian statehood however, and Israel has previously rejected a permanent ceasefire.
A Hamas source has told AFP the group is keen for a deal that “guarantees a permanent ceasefire, the free return of displaced people, an acceptable deal for (a prisoner-hostage) exchange and an end to the siege” in Gaza.

Mounting pressure
Netanyahu is under tremendous pressure from the families of hostages taken by Hamas in the October 7 attack to secure their release.
On Monday, the families of two Israeli captives seen alive in a video released by Hamas last weekend called for their release.
“I demand the leaders of the free world to help us bring our people home,” said Aviva Siegel, who was freed in the November truce and is the wife of captive Keith Siegel.
Israel estimates 129 hostages remain in Gaza, including 34 believed to be dead.
Hamas’s attack resulted in the deaths of about 1,170 people in Israel, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures.
Israel’s retaliatory offensive has killed at least 34,488 people in Gaza, mostly women and children, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory.
That tally includes at least 34 deaths in a 24-hour window, the ministry said Monday, down from a peak this month of at least 153 deaths on April 9.
At Rafah’s Al-Najjar hospital, a crowd of grief-stricken relatives jostled over the dead, shrouded in white.
“We demand the entire world to call for a lasting truce,” Abu Taha said at the hospital.

Access of aid
After an Israeli drone strike in early April killed seven workers from a US-based charity, Biden suggested to Netanyahu, for the first time, that continued US support could be conditional on protection and aid for civilians.
On Sunday, the White House said Israel was letting more aid trucks into Gaza in line with “commitments” Biden asked it to meet.
The UN has, however, continued to cite “access constraints” that significantly hinder delivery.
The US military is building a pier to help boost humanitarian supplies — an effort that the Pentagon on Monday said would cost Washington at least $320 million.
The UN has warned a heatwave and the proliferation of insects are increasing the risk for diseases at the swelling tent cities in Gaza.
“I have sick children who cannot tolerate the heat,” said Alaa Al-Saleh, a Palestinian displaced to an encampment in Rafah. “We are cramped inside the tent, rarely going outside.”

Suspected Al-Qaeda explosion kills 6 troops loyal to secessionist group in Yemen

Updated 30 April 2024
Follow

Suspected Al-Qaeda explosion kills 6 troops loyal to secessionist group in Yemen

  • AQAP is seen as one of the more dangerous branches of the terror group still operating more than a decade after the killing of founder Osama bin Laden

SANAA, Yemen: An explosive device detonated and killed six troops loyal to a United Arab Emirates-backed secessionist group Monday in southern Yemen, a military spokesman said, the latest attack blamed on Al-Qaeda militants in the impoverished Arab country.
The explosion hit a military vehicle as it passed in a mountainous area in the Modiyah district of southern Abyan province, said Mohamed Al-Naqib, a spokesman for the Southern Armed Forces, the military arm of the secessionist Southern Transitional Council.
Eleven other troops were wounded, he added.
It is at odds with the internationally recognized government, although they are allies in Yemen’s years long war against the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels who control the north and the capital Sanaa.
Al-Naqib blamed Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, or AQAP, for the attack.
AQAP is seen as one of the more dangerous branches of the terror group still operating more than a decade after the killing of founder Osama bin Laden.
It is active in several regions in Yemen, exploiting the country’s civil war to cement its presence in the nation at the southern tip of the Arabian Peninsula.
Yemen’s ruinous civil war began in 2014 when the Houthis seized the capital of Sanaa and much of northern Yemen and forced the internationally recognized government into exile.

 

 


US says five Israeli military units committed abuses in West Bank

Updated 30 April 2024
Follow

US says five Israeli military units committed abuses in West Bank

  • Israel has killed more than 34,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry
  • Press reports have identified a battalion called the Netzah Yehuda, composed mainly of ultra-Orthodox Jews, as being accused of abuses. It is about 1,000-strong and since 2022 has been stationed in the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since 1967

WASHINGTON: The United States has concluded that five Israeli security force units committed serious human rights violations against Palestinians in the West Bank before the Hamas attack in October, the State Department said Monday.
Israel has taken remedial measures with four of these units, making US sanctions less likely. Consultations are under way with Israel over the fifth unit, State Department deputy spokesman Vedant Patel told reporters.
He declined to identify the units, give details of the abuse, or say what measures the Israeli government had taken against them.
A US official speaking on condition of anonymity said the fifth unit is part of the army.

Children react as they flee following Israeli bombardment in Nuseirat in the central Gaza Strip on April 29, 2024, amid the ongoing conflict in the Palestinian territory between Israel and the militant group Hamas.  (AFP)

Press reports have identified a battalion called the Netzah Yehuda, composed mainly of ultra-Orthodox Jews, as being accused of abuses.
It is about 1,000-strong and since 2022 has been stationed in the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since 1967.
“After a careful process, we found five Israeli units responsible for individual incidents of gross violations of human rights,” Patel said.
All the incidents took place before the October 7 Hamas attack and were not in Gaza, he added.
“Four of these units have effectively remediated these violations, which is what we expect partners to do, and is consistent with what we expect all countries whom we have a secure relationship with,” said Patel.

Israeli military attacks Al-Shifa hospital complex in Gaza. (Reuters file photo)

Israel has provided “additional information” about the fifth unit, he added.
US law bars the government from funding or arming foreign security forces against which there are credible allegations of human rights abuses.
The United States provides military aid to allies around the world, including Israel.
The Israeli army has been fighting the militant Palestinian group Hamas in the Gaza Strip for almost seven months and is trading fire almost every day with Hezbollah along the border with Lebanon. Both groups are backed by Iran.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted angrily to recent news reports that the United States might slap sanctions against a unit of the Israeli military because of human rights abuses, saying the army should not be punished with the country at war.
Patel said the United States is continuing its evaluation of the fifth army unit and has not decided whether to deny it US military assistance.
This case comes with the administration of President Joe Biden under pressure to demand accountability from Israel over how it is waging war against Hamas, with such a high civilian death toll.
In an election year, more people are calling for the United States to make its billions of dollars in annual military aid to Israel contingent on more concern for Palestinian civilians. Pro-Palestinian protests are also sweeping US college campuses.
Hamas’ October attack in Israel resulted in the deaths of about 1,170 people in Israel, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures.
Israel’s retaliatory offensive has killed at least 34,488 people in Gaza, mostly women and children, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory.
 

 


US warns of ‘large-scale massacre’ in Sudan city

Updated 30 April 2024
Follow

US warns of ‘large-scale massacre’ in Sudan city

  • Millions have been displaced in the country since fighting began last year between the SAF forces of General Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan and RSF paramilitaries under General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo

UNITED NATIONS, United States: The US ambassador to the United Nations on Monday warned of an impending “large-scale massacre” in the Sudanese city of El-Fasher, a humanitarian hub in the Darfur region.
The city had until recently been relatively unaffected by fighting between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), but bombardment and clashes have been reported both there and in surrounding villages since mid-April.
El-Fasher “is on the precipice of a large-scale massacre. This is not conjecture. This is the grim reality facing millions of people,” Linda Thomas-Greenfield told journalists following a UN Security Council meeting on Sudan.
“There are already credible reports that the RSF and its allied militias have razed multiple villages west of El-Fasher, and as we speak, the RSF is planning an imminent attack on El-Fasher,” which “would be a disaster on top of a disaster,” Thomas-Greenfield said.
Millions have been displaced in the country since fighting began last year between the SAF forces of General Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan and RSF paramilitaries under General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo.
El-Fasher functions as the main humanitarian hub in the vast western region of Darfur, home to around a quarter of Sudan’s 48 million people.
 

 


Why Syria’s wars fell off the radar despite continued crisis and suffering

Updated 30 April 2024
Follow

Why Syria’s wars fell off the radar despite continued crisis and suffering

  • Media focus on the Gaza war and its spillovers has further reduced visibility of the Syrian conflict, say analysts
  • Despite ongoing fighting and displacement, Syria is viewed through the lens of the Israel-Iran stand-off

LONDON: More than 13 years have passed since the onset of Syria’s brutal civil war, with millions of Syrians continuing to endure displacement, destitution, and even renewed bouts of violence, with no political resolution in sight.

And yet, with the world preoccupied with simultaneous crises in Gaza and Ukraine, Syria’s plight seems to have faded into the background, becoming a mere sideshow in Iran and Israel’s escalating confrontation.

Omar Al-Ghazzi, an associate professor of media and communications at the London School of Economics, believes “the scale of killing in the genocidal war on Gaza has sadly raised the bar of reporting on human suffering, particularly in Arab countries.

“News media are so saturated with stories of human suffering in Gaza that wars in other countries, such as Syria and Sudan, get much less coverage,” he told Arab News. “This shows how mass killing in Gaza cheapens human life everywhere.”

According to the UN, 5 million Syrian refugees are living outside the country, while at least 7.2 million others are internally displaced. (AFP)

Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, launched in retaliation for the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on southern Israel, has killed more than 34,000 people, according to Gaza’s health ministry, and displaced more than 90 percent of the enclave’s population. 

Nanar Hawach, a senior Syria analyst at International Crisis Group, concurred, saying that “international reporting on the Middle East is focused on the Gaza war and its spillover to regional countries, which has further reduced the visibility of the Syrian conflict.

“A status quo has prevailed in Syria since 2020,” he told Arab News. “With frozen front lines and a stalled peace process, there is little progression or change to draw renewed attention.”

Since Oct. 7, media attention has focused almost exclusively on Israeli attacks on Syrian targets, including Iran’s interests in the country.

One recent Syria-related incident that gripped the world’s attention was the suspected Israeli strike on the Iranian Embassy’s annex in Damascus, which killed Quds Force commander Mohammad Reza Zahedi and his deputy.

Rescue workers search in the rubble of a building annexed to the Iranian embassy after an air strike in Damascus on April 2, 2024. (AFP)​​​

“In terms of geopolitics, the status quo in Syria seems to have settled on a hum of internal warfare,” said Al-Ghazzi. “News media are only interested in the Syria story if it affects the stand-off between Iran and Israel.

“There are also regional and international actors who are interested in portraying Syria as a safe country for the resettlement of refugees, which may also explain the lack of appetite in covering ongoing warfare there.”

There are currently more than 5 million Syrian refugees living outside the country, while at least 7.2 million others are internally displaced, according to UN figures.

Neighboring host countries, including Turkiye, Lebanon and Jordan, have been pushing Syrian refugees to return, often involuntarily, claiming the war has ended and that their areas are now safe. Others have normalized relations with the Bashar Assad regime.

But the reality on the ground is grim, offering little hope for safe refugee repatriation.

Children attend class in make-shift classrooms at a camp for the displaced in Syria’s northwestern Idlib province on December 20, 2021. (AFP)

Syrians inside the country continue to endure many hardships, made worse by economic pressures, persecution by armed factions, and the aftermath of the Feb. 6, 2023 twin earthquakes that devastated parts of the north.

Anti-government protests in the southern Druze-majority city of Suweida have been ongoing since August due to deteriorating economic conditions, with smaller demonstrations also taking place in Daraa.

Syria has also been “facing a massive upsurge in violence” on several fronts since September last year, according to Louis Charbonneau, the UN director at Human Rights Watch.

In an interview last month with Erbil-based media agency Rudaw, Charbonneau said that Syria has seen “a severe increase in attacks on civilians.”

In late April, Syrian regime forces clashed with what the country’s defense ministry referred to as a “terrorist group” that attempted an attack on a military post near Idlib in the country’s opposition-held northwest.

INNUMBERS

102 Civilians, including 11 children and 14 women, killed in March, according to The Syrian Network for Human Rights.

5 Individuals who died of torture in March in Syria, the SNHR said.

Meanwhile, a senior official at a Russian center in Syria, Rear Adm. Vadim Kulit, told news agencies his country’s aircraft destroyed “two sites serving as bases for fighters taking part in the shelling of Syrian government forces. More than 20 terrorists were liquidated.”

Kulit also said Syrian regime forces lost a soldier a day earlier when they came under fire from militants in Latakia.

In the southern governorate of Daraa, where the uprising against the regime began in 2011, a series of explosions has kept residents in a constant grip of anxiety.

The most recent of these took place in early April, when an explosive device “planted by terrorists” in the city of Sanamayn killed seven children, according to state media. Local militia leader Ahmad Al-Labbad was accused of planting the bomb, with the explosion sparking clashes the following day between rival armed groups in Daraa.

Twenty people were killed in the subsequent fighting, including three of Al-Labbad’s family members and 14 of his fighters, according to the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

People gather around ambulances and a fire truck at the scene of a bomb explosion in the norther Syrian city of Azaz, early on March 31, 2024. (AFP)

In northern Syria, the Turkish-backed Syrian National Army militia and its Military Police have been accused by Human Rights Watch of committing human rights abuses in the areas under their control. 

The SNA invaded the Afrin and Ras Al-Ain regions, territories that had previously been a part of the Kurdish-led Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria, in 2018 and 2019, respectively.

Noting the “clear, intentional demographic changes in Afrin,” Charbonneau said in his interview with Rudaw that the SNA has been “removing Kurds who are living in these areas and then replacing them with Arabs who were living in other parts of Syria.”

A report published in March by the UK-based Syrian Network for Human Rights also claims that the US-backed and Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces have been targeting areas in the Aleppo governorate with “indiscriminate and disproportionate shelling” in “a clear violation of international humanitarian law.”

The report added that the “group’s indiscriminate killings amount to war crimes.” 

In Idlib, a suicide bombing early this month in the town of Sarmada killed Abu Maria Al-Qahtani, one of the founders of Al-Nusra Front, which renamed itself Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham after severing ties with Al-Qaeda.

Mourners march with the body of Abu Maria Al-Qahtani during his funeral in Syria’s Idlib on April 5, 2024. (AFP)

The Syrian Network for Human Rights’ report said that Syrian regime forces in February carried out attacks on armed opposition factions in the rural parts of Aleppo, Idlib, and Hama.

October last year saw a week of intense airstrikes by Syrian regime and Russian forces on Idlib and parts of western Aleppo. This bombing campaign was triggered by a drone attack on a Syrian military academy in Homs, which killed more than 100 people, including civilians.

Reuters had described the attack on the Homs military academy as “one of the bloodiest attacks ever against a Syrian army installation.”

Also in February, US airstrikes targeted regime-controlled areas in Deir ez-Zor governorate, focusing on military outposts hosting pro-regime Iranian militias, the report added.

Syrian soldiers arrange caskets during the funeral of the victims of a drone attack targeting a Syrian military academy, outside a hospital in Homs on October 6, 2023. (AFP)

Camille Alexandre Otrakji, a Syrian-Canadian analyst, believes the violence in Syria has slipped from global attention because “many media organizations prioritize what is best for Israel. 

“Unfortunately for Syrians, Israel’s interests align with the continuation of conflict in their country,” he told Arab News. “Raising awareness of their suffering can exert pressure on the international community to actively pursue negotiated compromises to end the conflict, which is not in Israel’s interest.

“Western media rarely exhibited an interest in outcomes other than victory for the side they supported and championed.” However, “as that side has largely dissipated, only a disparate collection of unattractive armed groups remains, challenging their common portrayal as the ‘good side.’”

He added: “The novelty and intensity of a conflict influences perceptions of its newsworthiness. The 13-year conflict in Syria peaked years ago, leading to coverage fatigue and a general sense of Syria fatigue among both audiences and activists. Charitable organizations are also experiencing a noticeable decline in donations for Syria.”

Camille Alexandre Otrakji, a Syrian-Canadian analyst, believes the violence in Syria has slipped from global attention because “many media organizations prioritize what is best for Israel. (AFP)

Moreover, as social media activists “have realized that their activism or influence does not translate into tangible gains on the ground,” their motivation to continue covering the conflict in Syria “has dramatically declined.”

UN experts believe the only way to end the Syrian conflict is through a political process. But for more than a year, “the intra-Syrian political process has been in deep freeze,” UN Special Envoy for Syria Geir Pedersen said in August.

“A continued stalemate is likely to increase international disengagement,” Hawach of the International Crisis Group told Arab News. “Without significant concessions from Syrian actors and the involved external parties, the Syrian issue risks becoming a forgotten case.”