India facing ‘unprecedented’ situation

Tens of thousands of farmers have set up barricades on roads into New Delhi since November 26, vowing not to move until the laws are repealed. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 11 December 2020
Follow

India facing ‘unprecedented’ situation

  • Nationwide farmer strike demands end to ‘corporatizing’ laws

NEW DELHI: A nationwide strike by Indian farmers and 15 opposition parties demanding a rollback of three agricultural laws has brought the country to a standstill.

The laws were passed by New Delhi in September, and following months of agitation, experts have called the situation “unprecedented” for India.

“Never in the past three decades have I seen such unprecedented, organized farmer protests,” Urmilesh Singh, a New Delhi- based political analyst, told Arab News.

 

“This is a movement which is not led by any political party. It is very organic. If a political leadership emerges out of the protest, then it would be a huge challenge for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s regime,” he added.

Farmers claim the reforms work against their interests due to deregulation and allowing private players unhindered production access.

“We are observing a strike from 9 a.m. in the morning to 3 p.m. in the afternoon to register our protest against the new farm laws that threaten the existence of farmers,” Sunil Pradhan, leader of the Indian Farmers’ Union, told Arab News.

“Our agitation will continue until the government withdraws its laws that would lead to the corporatization of the farm sector and marginalization of farmers,” he added.

Tuesday’s strike follows several rounds of inconclusive talks between the two sides, with another meeting due to take place on Wednesday.

While Pradhan and several other farmers blocked the national highway in Greater Noida, the intensity of the protests could be seen in the northern Indian states of Haryana, Punjab and Delhi, while other states reported clashes between opposition leaders and police.

“Modi should stop stealing from farmers,” Rahul Gandhi, opposition leader and former president of the Congress party, tweeted on Tuesday.

“All our countrymen know that today is a nationwide shutdown. By supporting the shutdown, please help in the success of our food growers’ struggle,” he added.

Meanwhile, in a statement released in New Delhi on Tuesday, another farmer leader, Rakesh Tikait, sought to distance protesters from political parties.

“Our shutdown is different from that of political parties. It is a four-hour symbolic strike for an ideological cause. We want that there should be no problem for the common people. We appeal to them not to travel during this period,” he said.

The protests began almost two weeks ago when tens of thousands of farmers from Haryana and Punjab marched to New Delhi, urging the government to withdraw the latest legislation, which allows traders to stockpile grains. Farmers fear it will lead to rising prices and more profit for traders amid the coronavirus pandemic.

However, the government argues that the move would allow growers to be self-sufficient by setting prices and selling products directly to private firms, such as supermarket chains.

Farmers are not buying that and say the new laws would instead pave the way for the government to stop purchasing the crops at guaranteed prices, leaving them “at the mercy of private buyers” who will aggressively fix prices.

The legislation exposes the agriculture sector to market forces. It has a provision to allow farmers to sell their produce directly to private players and allow corporate investment in farms.

Until now, produce prices had been fixed by the government under the Minimum Support Price (MSP), which farmers say is usually higher than market rates.

Farmers fear that once the free market assumes a significant role in the agriculture sector, the government will withdraw from the MSP.

One of the main demands made by farmers is for statutory support of the MSP.

“We want legal status for the MSP because the state government regulates mandis (markets). Verbal promises won’t work. Farmers need statutory support,” said Shiv Kumar Sharma, president of the National Farmers Conglomerate.

The government has blamed opposition parties for “misleading farmers,” and accused the Congress party of “indulging in duplicity” by supporting the protests.

“The opposition parties are politicizing the farmers’ agitation,” said Sudesh Verma, spokesperson of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party.

“The opposition has been losing elections; they don’t have adequate presence in the parliament and see an opportunity in the farmers’ protest to oppose Modi,” he added.

Verma said the government was willing to listen to the “genuine concerns” of farmers.

“The government is willing to address all the farmers’ concerns and discuss all the sticking points, but to demand that the laws are wrong and should be repealed is not justified,” he added.

He questioned the rationale behind calling for an all-India strike on Tuesday “especially when the next round of talks is on Wednesday.”

Verma said: “I believe that farmers have been misled to call for a nationwide strike.

“There has been a consensus that there should be reform in the agriculture sector. Why are those parties advocating reforms now opposing it?”

However, agriculture experts said that “farmers are not foolish enough to protest against laws had they been beneficial for them.”

Devendra Sharma, one Punjab-based agriculture expert, said: “The present crisis is there because the farmers have been denied their rightful income over the decades.

“The simmering anger finds its echo in the protest against the central laws. Farmers fear that in the days to come their livelihood is going to be hit very badly.”


UN extends mandate for UN peacekeepers in Western Sahara, with Algeria protesting over human rights

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

UN extends mandate for UN peacekeepers in Western Sahara, with Algeria protesting over human rights

UNITED NATIONS: The UN Security Council voted to extend the mandate of the UN peacekeeping force in the Western Sahara for another year Thursday with Algeria refusing to vote in protest at the resolution’s failure to include a reference to monitoring human rights in the disputed north African territory.
The vote was 12 countries in favor, Russia and Mozambique abstaining, and Al geria, which supports the Polisario Front, one of the parties to the nearly 50-year dispute, not voting.
Morocco annexed Western Sahara, a former Spanish colony in 1975, sparking a conflict with the Algerian-backed pro-independence Polisario Front. The region is believed to have considerable offshore oil deposits and mineral resources and is slightly larger than the United Kingdom.
The UN brokered a 1991 ceasefire and established a peacekeeping mission to monitor the truce and help prepare a referendum on the territory’s future. Disagreements over who is eligible to vote have prevented the referendum from taking place, and Morocco insists it will now only support autonomy for the Western Sahara.
The Polisario Front renewed armed conflict in 2020, ending a 29-year truce, and tensions have escalated.
Algeria’s UN Ambassador Amar Bendjama tried unsuccessfully to get two amendments inserted into the US-drafted resolution, and lashed out at the United States for reportedly not including its requests including for the UN mission known as MINURSO to monitor human rights in Western Sahara in the resolution.
US deputy ambassador Robert Wood said the resolution makes clear the Security Council’s support for Staffan de Mistura, the secretary-general’s personal envoy to Western Sahara, “as he intensifies efforts to advance an enduring and dignified resolution for Western Sahara without further delay.”
Wood said it is “more urgent than ever to reach a political solution for Western Sahara,” noting that US Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently reiterated that the US views Morocco’s autonomy proposal “as serious, credible, and realistic and one potential approach to satisfy the aspirations of the people of Western Sahara.”
Earlier this month, UN envoy de Mistura proposed dividing Western Sahara as one potential way to satisfy both sides and give residents a chance to decide under who they want to live, but he told the council that both Morocco and the Polisario Front showed “no sign of willingness to explore it further.”

German lawyers ask court to block ship allegedly carrying explosives to Israeli company

Updated 01 November 2024
Follow

German lawyers ask court to block ship allegedly carrying explosives to Israeli company

  • German-based Lubeca Marine, which owns the MV Kathrin, said the ship “was never scheduled to make any port calls in Israel”

BERLIN: Human rights lawyers have filed a court appeal in Berlin seeking to block a 150-metric-ton shipment of military-grade explosives aboard German cargo ship MV Kathrin which they say is to be delivered to Israel’s biggest defense contractor. The European Legal Support Center said on Wednesday the action was filed on behalf of three Palestinians from Gaza, arguing that the shipment of primarily RDX explosives could be used in munitions for Israel’s war in Gaza, potentially contributing to alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Israel denies accusations that it has committed war crimes in the Gaza Strip, saying its forces abide by international humanitarian law while fighting Palestinian militants who operate in densely populated civilian areas.
German-based Lubeca Marine, which owns the MV Kathrin, said the ship “was never scheduled to make any port calls in Israel” and had recently discharged its cargo, originally destined for Bar, Montenegro, without disclosing where the discharge took place.
The company declined to disclose details of the cargo for contractual reasons, but said it complied fully with all international and EU regulations, ensuring necessary permits are obtained before any operations.
The ELSC said the RDX shipment was destined for Israeli Military Industries, a division of Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest defense contractor. Elbit Systems declined to comment.
“We never claimed that the Kathrin was bound for Israel (itself), it’s the cargo which is bound for Elbit Systems,” ELSC lawyer Ahmed Abed told Reuters regarding the group’s appeal filed at Berlin’s Administrative Court. “The company ignored all the warnings.”
LSEG data and vessel-tracking website Marine Traffic indicated that the MV Kathrin had docked in the major Egyptian Mediterranean port of Alexandria on Monday and was last seen there.
According to the port of Alexandria’s website, the ship, which it identified as German, unloaded military equipment in Alexandria and was set to depart on Nov. 5.


Blinken urges China to rein in Pyongyang amid warnings that North Korean troops were set to join Russia’s war against Ukraine

Updated 01 November 2024
Follow

Blinken urges China to rein in Pyongyang amid warnings that North Korean troops were set to join Russia’s war against Ukraine

  • Some 10,000 North Korean troops in Russia, 8,000 in Kursk region
  • US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin believes Ukraine can hold Russian territory in Kursk

WASHINGTON: The United States expects North Korean troops in Russia’s Kursk region to enter the fight against Ukraine in the coming days, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Thursday as he pressed China to use its influence to rein in Pyongyang.
Blinken spoke after North Korea conducted its longest-ever intercontinental ballistic missile test earlier on Thursday and South Korea warned that Pyongyang could get missile technology from Russia in exchange for helping with the war in Ukraine.
The top US diplomat said there were 10,000 North Korean troops in Russia, including as many as 8,000 in the Kursk region where Ukrainian forces continue to hold territory after fighting their way into the Russian border area in August.
At a press conference with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and their South Korean counterparts, Blinken said Russia has been training the North Korean soldiers in artillery, unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones, and basic infantry operations, indicating they “fully intend” to use the forces in frontline operations.
They would become legitimate military targets if they enter the battlefield, Blinken said.
“We’ve not yet seen these troops deploy into combat against Ukrainian forces, but we would expect that to happen in the coming days,” he said.
During their meeting, the US and South Korea discussed a range of options for responding, Blinken added, saying Moscow’s use of North Korean soldiers in its “meat grinder” war against Ukraine was a “clear sign of weakness.”
Austin said the US would announce new security assistance for Ukraine in coming days.

Russia-North Korea Cooperation
Blinken and his South Korea and Japanese counterparts condemned the ICBM launch as a flagrant violation of UN Security Council resolutions. The flight-time of the missile was 87 minutes, according to South Korea, putting nearly all of the United States within range.
The Kremlin on Thursday declined to comment when asked if Russia was helping North Korea to develop its missile and other military technology.
Blinken said Beijing, like Washington, should be very concerned about what Russia might be doing in order to enhance North Korea’s military capacities because it was destabilizing to Asia.
Austin said the Pentagon was very early in its assessment phase of the launch “and we don’t see any indication at this point that there was Russian involvement.”
Blinken said the US and South Korea agreed China should do more to curb North Korea’s provocative actions and US officials had had a “robust conversation” with Beijing this week.
“They know well the concerns that we have, and the expectations that, both in word and deed, they’ll use the influence that they have to work to curb these activities,” Blinken said of Chinese officials.
Beijing, partners with both Moscow and Pyongyang, has so far repeated calls for deescalation by all sides and a political settlement to the Korean conflict.
The United States, France, Japan, Malta, South Korea, Slovenia and Britain requested a UN Security Council meeting over the ICBM launch and two diplomats said it would likely take place on Monday.
Washington says China, which entered a “no limits” partnership with Moscow ahead of Russia’s February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, has been supporting the Kremlin’s war with dual use goods to prop up the Russian defense industrial base.
China rejects the US accusations about what it calls normal trade with Russia.
Austin said Ukraine could hold on to Russian territory in Kursk, and that the number of North Korean troops pales in comparison to casualties Russian forces recently have been suffering — some 1,250 a day.
“I do believe that they can hold on to the territory, if they choose to do that. They do have options,” Austin said of Ukrainian troops.
Many Western analysts argue China should be alarmed by any North Korean participation in Russia’s war, saying it’s a sign Pyongyang has reduced its reliance on Beijing and that its involvement would galvanize closer ties between Washington’s European and Asian allies.
Nonetheless, Sydney Seiler, a former US national intelligence officer for North Korea, said China was not disturbed enough to actively oppose the deployments.
“I don’t think China openly supports this. But at the same time, they’re not going to do what’s necessary to stop it,” he said.


Kamala Harris says Trump’s comment on women ‘is offensive to everybody’

Updated 01 November 2024
Follow

Kamala Harris says Trump’s comment on women ‘is offensive to everybody’

  • Trump had said he would "protect" women whether they “like it or not,” referring to abortion restrictions that he would push for if he becomes president again
  • “This is just the latest on a long series of reveals by the former president of how he thinks about women and their agency,” Harris responded

PHOENIX, Arizona: Kamala Harris said Thursday that Donald Trump’s comment that he would protect women whether they “like it or not” shows that the Republican presidential nominee does not understand women’s rights “to make decisions about their own lives, including their own bodies.”
“I think it’s offensive to everybody, by the way,” Harris said before she set out to spend the day campaigning in the Western battleground states of Arizona and Nevada.
She followed up those remarks at her rally in Phoenix: “He simply does not respect the freedom of women or the intelligence of women to know what’s in their own best interests and make decisions accordingly. But we trust women.”
The comments by Trump come as he has struggled to connect with women voters and as Harris courts women in both parties with a message centered on freedom. She’s making the pitch that women should be free to make their own decisions about their bodies and that if Trump is elected, more restrictions will follow.
Trump appointed three of the justices to the US Supreme Court who formed the conservative majority that overturned federal abortion rights. As the fallout from the 2022 decision spreads, he has taken to claiming at public events and in social media posts that he would “protect women” and ensure they wouldn’t be “thinking about abortion.”
At a rally Wednesday evening near Green Bay, Wisconsin, Trump told his supporters that aides had urged him to stop using the phrase because it was “inappropriate.”
Then he added a new bit to the protector line. He said he told his aides: “Well, I’m going to do it whether the women like it or not. I am going to protect them.”
Harris said the remark was part of a pattern of troubling statements by Trump.
“This is just the latest on a long series of reveals by the former president of how he thinks about women and their agency,” she said.
Harris tied Trump’s comments to his approach to reproductive rights, but Trump generally speaks more of protecting women from criminals, terrorists and foreign adversaries, in keeping with the bleak picture he paints of a country in decline.
“I’m going to protect them from migrants coming in. I’m going to protect them from foreign countries that want to hit us with missiles and lots of other things,” Trump said during a rally in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
He seemed to tie in abortion when he first used the “protector” language in a Truth Social post and at a rally in Indiana, Pennsylvania, on Sept. 20. He assured the women who would be “protected” that they “will no longer be thinking about abortion.”
The dispute showed signs Thursday of further entrenching each candidate’s supporters.
It was not only women who described Trump’s remarks as offensive. At the Harris rally in Phoenix, Edison Kinlicheenie, 50, said he sees Trump more as a threat than a protector, noting that the former president has a track record of preying on women.
“I have a wife and a daughter, so I wouldn’t let no predator like that come around” them, Kinlicheenie said.
At a Trump rally in Albuquerque, Sarah Pyle, 41, cited the opposition to allowing transgender athletes to compete in women’s events to portray Trump as someone who helps women.
“I don’t want my girls to grow up in a world like this,” the Albuquerque mother said, referring to the controversy. “We fought for women’s rights for so long, and now we’re giving them back to men. It makes no sense.”
More broadly, Trump and Republicans have struggled with how to talk about abortion rights, particularly as women around the nation are grappling with obtaining proper medical care because of abortion restrictions that have had implications far beyond the ability to end an unwanted pregnancy.
Trump has given contradictory answers about his position on abortion, at some points saying that women should be punished for having abortions and showcasing the justices he appointed. During his successful 2016 campaign, he told voters that if he were elected, he would appoint justices to the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade and said he was “pro-life.”
But in recent weeks he’s promised to veto a national abortion ban, after repeatedly refusing to make such a pledge. He’s said the states should regulate care and said some laws were “too tough.”
Since 2022, the patchwork of state laws on abortion has created uneven medical care. Some women have died. Others have bled in emergency room parking lots or became critically ill from sepsis as doctors in states with strict abortion bans send pregnant women away until they are sick enough to warrant medical care. That includes women who never intended to end pregnancies. Both infant and maternal mortality has risen.
Harris’ campaign has highlighted Trump’s statements around women. In one campaign ad, a woman who became gravely ill with sepsis after a pregnancy complication stands in front of a mirror looking at a large scar on her abdomen, as audio plays of Trump’s comments about protecting women.
Harris hopes abortion will be a strong motivator for women at the ballot box.
In early voting so far, 1.2 million more women than men have voted across the seven battleground states, according to data from analytics firm TargetSmart.
That doesn’t necessarily translate into Democratic gains. But in the 2020 presidential election, there was a 9 percentage point difference between men and women in support for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, according to AP VoteCast, a survey of more than 110,000 voters.
The Democratic ticket was supported by 55 percent of women and 46 percent of men. That was essentially unchanged from the 2018 midterms, when VoteCast found a 10-point gender gap, with 58 percent of women and 48 percent of men backing Democrats in congressional races.
 


UN rapporteur urges climate activist’s release ahead of COP29

Updated 01 November 2024
Follow

UN rapporteur urges climate activist’s release ahead of COP29

GENEVA: The UN rapporteur on environmental defenders on Thursday urged Azerbaijan to free Anar Mammadli, saying his detention seemed aimed at silencing climate advocates ahead of November’s COP29 summit.
Michel Forst voiced alarm over the alleged “persecution, penalization and harassment” of Mammadli, who has now been in pre-trial detention for six months on “allegedly trumped-up criminal charges” in what the rapporteur called “apparent reprisal for his environmental activism.”
“I am gravely concerned about the deterioration in the treatment of Mr.Mammadli and the crackdowns on civil society actors, including environmental defenders,” Forst said in a statement.
Mammadli risks up to eight years behind bars on smuggling charges which human rights groups claim are bogus.
He and activist Bashir Suleymanli had formed a civil society group called Climate of Justice Initiative, which set out to promote environmental justice in the tightly-controlled, oil-rich nation.
The COP29 UN climate summit is being held in Azerbaijan’s capital Baku from November 11-22.
Forst said it appeared that the charges and the lengthy detention “were a form of retaliation against Mr. Mammadli for his efforts in the lead up to COP29.”
His ongoing detention on charges subject only to a preliminary investigation “therefore appears grossly unreasonable and disproportionate.”
“The length of Mr. Mammadli’s pre-trial detention also strongly indicates that it is a measure that is punitive in nature, aiming to intimidate Mr. Mammadli and other environmental defenders from speaking out, particularly in the lead up to COP29. This is unacceptable.”
Mammadli’s health has deteriorated in detention and served to “further penalize” him, Forst said, calling for his immediate release and for the charges to be “immediately dropped.”
As UN special rapporteur, Forst is tasked with taking measures to protect any person experiencing or at imminent threat of penalization, persecution or harassment for seeking to exercise their rights under the convention.
Azerbaijan is a party to the convention.
The former Soviet republic wedged between Russia and Iran has faced considerable scrutiny over its hosting of COP29.