US, India sign strategic security agreement amid anti-China rhetoric

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh address a joint press conference at Hyderabad House in New Delhi on Oct. 27, 2020. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 27 October 2020
Follow

US, India sign strategic security agreement amid anti-China rhetoric

  • Secretary of State Pompeo reaffirms Washington's stance to support India in efforts to ‘defend its sovereignty’
  • Some analysts in New Delhi remain skeptical to the American claim, saying that the deal will further escalate Indo-China tensions

NEW DELHI: The United States and India signed a defense agreement on Tuesday that will provide New Delhi access to classified satellite and sensor data available with the US security establishment, a major tool that is likely to have significant military ramifications for the region.
“We held a comprehensive discussion on a range of key issues,” Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh said at a news conference on Tuesday where he also described the signing of the Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement (BECA) between the two countries as “a significant move.”
“We identified projects for the joint development of defense equipment,” he continued. “We reaffirmed our commitment to peace and security of the Indo-Pacific region.”
The US and India signed the deal during the annual 2+2 dialogue between the defense and foreign ministers of the two countries amid escalating tensions and a “war-like situation” between New Delhi and Beijing in the disputed Himalayan region of Ladakh.
The situation also remains precarious in Kashmir where India and Pakistan frequently blame each another for cross-border skirmishes that injure and kill soldiers and civilians on both sides of the Line of Control.
Tuesday’s development follows 20 Indian soldiers losing their lives during a deadly clash in the Galwan Valley of Ladakh on June 15, breaking 45 years of peace at the Indo-China border.
Reaffirming its support for New Delhi in the faceoff with China, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told the media that his country would “stand with India in its efforts to defend its sovereignty.”
US Secretary of Defense Mark Esper added it was time to institutionalize cooperation between the two nations.
“Our focus now must be on institutionalizing and regularizing our cooperation to meet the challenges of the day and uphold the principles of a free and open Indo-Pacific well into the future,” Esper said in the meeting with the Indian delegation.
In 2016, Washington designated New Delhi as a “major defense partner” and signed the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA) which allows the militaries of both the countries to use their bases for strategic purposes.
Two years later, in 2018, the two nations signed the Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA) for “interoperability between the two militaries and sale of high-end technology from the US to India.”
Singh said that India’s “military to military cooperation” with the US was “moving forward very well,” as he described Tuesday’s deal as a “significant” step in the right direction.
“Signing the BECA today, after signing LEMOA in 2016 and COMCASA in 2018 is a significant achievement in that direction … of bilateral defense issues and larger regional and global perspective,” he said.
The US, for its part, threw the spotlight on “advanced” security and cooperation between the two allies.
“This year marks the 15th anniversary of the first US-India Defense Framework and our third 2+2 Ministerial. We have strengthened our defense and security partnership considerably since then ... We [also] advanced our regional security, military-to-military, and information-sharing cooperation,” Esper said.
Experts believe the BECA defense pact would “facilitate operational engagement” between the two nations.
“BECA will complete the four basic agreements that facilitate operational engagement between the armed forces of the two states,” Pranay Kotasthane, a strategic expert at Bengaluru-based think-tank, the Takshashila Institution, told Arab News.
He said that the agreement did not compromise India’s strategic autonomy as was “feared by some.”
“The keyword here is ‘facilitate.’ There is no loss of autonomy because of these agreements. India doesn’t become beholden to fighting American wars because of these agreements,” he added.
Former Indian ambassador Anil Wadhwa agreed, saying that the deal broke the past “hesitation” of sharing data between the two nations.
“It certainly strengthens close military and technical cooperation. There would be no hesitation in terms of changing data and selling of equipment based on geospatial information,” Wadhwa, who served as Indian ambassador to Italy, Poland, Oman and Thailand, told Arab News.
The 2+2 dialogue is a format to discuss defense and security issues between India and the US, and it aims at enhancing peace and stability across the Indo-Pacific region.
Launched in 2015, it replaces the India-US Strategic Dialogue which remained in place since 2009 and focused on regional security, economic cooperation, defense, trade, and climate challenges.
Underlining its importance, Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said on Tuesday: “Our national security convergences have obviously grown in a more multipolar world. We met today to not only advance our own interests but to ensure that our bilateral cooperation makes a positive contribution in the world arena.”
The timing and the intent of the defense pact, however, raises questions on whether India is preparing itself to counter China.
Some experts say that at a time when New Delhi should be trying to reconcile its differences with Beijing, the American “embrace would frighten China.”
“The USA will not come to help India to fight China. The only result from this kind of deal would be greater enmity ... We are creating a situation where we are leaving China with no other alternative but to declare war on India,” New Delhi-based political analyst Prem Shankar Jha told Arab News.
He added that “we are doing everything we can to frighten the Chinese, but this will further heighten the tension” between the two countries.
Wadhwa disagreed, however, saying: “If Beijing is not concerned about New Delhi’s sensitivity, why should India care?”
“The Chinese have not been sensitive to our concerns; they did what they wanted to do. They have been at the Indian territory in Ladakh which they have not done before. In that situation, we had no choice but to get the defense deal from whichever place it was available,” he told Arab News.
Kotasthane said that the defense deal would “balance China’s growing power and arrogance.”
“China has chosen to provoke India militarily,” he added. “Under such circumstances, it is prudent for India to balance China's growing power and arrogance by collaborating with other states on its own terms.”


US troops to leave Chad in second African state withdrawal

Updated 58 min 4 sec ago
Follow

US troops to leave Chad in second African state withdrawal

  • It is important to stress that this withdrawal in no way signifies a break in cooperation between the two countries in the fight against terrorism

WASHINGTON: The US will withdraw some troops from Chad, the Pentagon has said, days after Washington agreed to move forces out of neighboring Niger.
The US has approximately 100 troops stationed in Chad as part of its strategy to combat extremism in West Africa.
“USAFRICOM is currently planning to reposition some US military forces from Chad, a portion of which were already scheduled to depart,” Pentagon press secretary Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder told a news conference, referring to the US Africa Command.
“This is a temporary step as part of an ongoing review of our security cooperation, which will resume after Chad’s May 6 presidential election.”
The withdrawal of about 75 US Army Special Forces personnel is scheduled to begin this weekend and be completed within days unless there are last-minute diplomatic developments, the New York Times reported, citing US officials.
Chad’s air force chief had ordered the US military this month to halt activities at an air base near the capital N’Djamena, according to a letter sent to the transitional government.
He said he had asked the US military to provide documents “justifying its presence at the Adji Kossei Air Base” but had not received any.
US troops at the Adji Kossei military base train anti-terrorism special forces and an elite unit of the Chadian army to combat the Nigerian jihadist group Boko Haram.
“The presence of American forces in Chad was initially motivated by a common commitment to the fight against terrorism, an objective shared between the two nations,” a Chadian government spokesperson said.
“However, the Chadian general staff has expressed concerns about this presence,” said Abderaman Koulamallah. In recognition of the concerns expressed, the US government has decided to temporarily withdraw its forces from Chad.
“It is important to stress that this withdrawal does not in any way signal a break in cooperation between the two countries in the fight against terrorism.
“Further discussions will take place to explore the possibility of the return of US forces in the case of a specific bilateral agreement between the two nations.”
Neighboring Niger is also a linchpin in the US and French strategy to combat jihadists in the region.
But Niger’s ruling military junta said in March that it was ending a military cooperation agreement with Washington, claiming it had been imposed and the US troop presence was illegal.
Washington this week began discussions with Niger on withdrawing the more than 1,000 US personnel in the country, which is also home to a $100-million American drone base.
The US will “continue to explore options on how we can ensure that we’re able to continue to address potential terrorist threats” in the wake of the withdrawal, Ryder said this week following the announcement of the US pull-out from Niger.
General Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno seized the presidency of Chad in a 2021 coup after the death of his father, Idriss Deby Itno, who had ruled the Sahel country with an iron fist for more than three decades.
He announced in March his candidacy in the upcoming presidential election that has seen opposition candidates banned from running, and his main rival Yaya Dillo Djerou shot dead in an army assault on his party headquarters.
 

 


Voter turnout slumps, Modi ‘wave’ missing from India’s 2024 polls

Updated 27 April 2024
Follow

Voter turnout slumps, Modi ‘wave’ missing from India’s 2024 polls

  • India’s general election started on April 19 and is taking place in seven phases till June 1
  • Voters are battling extreme temperatures as parts of India gripped by heatwave

NEW DELHI: Voter numbers have slumped in the first and second phase of India’s general election, with experts saying that the “wave” of enthusiasm that brought incumbent Prime Minister Narendra Modi to power in 2014 was no longer present in the ongoing polls.
More than 968 million people have been registered to vote in the world’s biggest general election, in which Modi and his Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party are aiming for a rare third consecutive term in power.
The first phase of voting was on April 19 and the polls are taking place over six weeks, with results expected on June 4.
India has a total of 28 states and eight federally governed territories. Some regions complete the process on a single day, while others spread it out over several phases.
The second phase was on April 26 and the other voting dates will be May 7, May 13, May 20, May 25 and June 1.
Friday’s turnout was estimated by the Election Commission of India at 61 percent — compared with 68 percent in the second phase five years ago. In the first phase, it was 65 percent against nearly 70 percent in 2019.
The lower turnout showed “apathy toward politics,” D. Dhanuraj, chairman of the Kerala-based Center for Public Policy Research, told Arab News.
“I think it is clear now that there is no wave in favor of any party as such. In 2014, there was a wave, in 2019 there was a wave,” he said, referring to the enthusiastic pro-Modi balloting in the past two general elections.
“(In) 2024, there was a talk that there was a wave, but I think it is becoming clear that there is no such wave, no wave that would give exponential majority in the parliament to any party.”
Modi and his BJP-led National Democratic Alliance are challenged by an alliance of two dozen opposition parties — the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance, or INDIA — led by the Congress party, which has ruled the country for close to 45 years since independence in 1947.
Congress plunged to a historic low when it was swept out of power by the BJP in the 2014 and 2019 general vote, and won its second-lowest number of 52 seats in 2019, when Modi’s party enjoyed a landslide victory, winning 303 out of 543 seats in the lower house of parliament.
The party or coalition that wins at least 272 parliamentary seats forms the government.
In 2024, Modi has been aiming for 400 seats for the National Democratic Alliance led by his BJP. But the target, often cited ahead of the first phase, has not been repeated.
Although pre-poll surveys suggested Modi would easily win, it is no longer projected to be a landslide as in in the two previous elections.
“It was the electoral rhetoric of the BJP to cross 400 seats, but this reality is not happening, it seems now,” Satish Kumar Singh, political analyst in Delhi, told Arab News.
“The BJP gave that slogan just to galvanize voters. When there is less voting that also means that the BJP might not have a whopping majority, it might be close to a simple majority.”
Another factor deterring voters from standing in long queues at polling stations was the hotter-than-normal summer, with temperatures in some states on Friday exceeding 40 degrees Celsius.
“There is no wave but heatwave in this election,” Singh said. “That is keeping the voters away from the polling booths.”
Not all experts expected the lower turnout to affect the ruling party’s chances in the polls.
“There seems to me no empirical evidence that if voter turnout increases it supports any side — the ruling (party) or the opposition,” said Sandeep Shashtry, political analyst and vice-chancellor of Jagran Lakecity University in Bhopal.
“I think we cannot make a generalization about the wider implications.”


Anti-war protesters dig in as some schools close encampments after reports of antisemitic activity

Updated 27 April 2024
Follow

Anti-war protesters dig in as some schools close encampments after reports of antisemitic activity

  • Protesters nationwide are demanding that schools cut financial ties to Israel and divest from companies they say are enabling the conflict
  • Early Saturday, police in riot gear cleared an encampment on the campus of Northeastern University in Boston while several dozen students shouted and booed at them

NEW YORK: As students protesting the Israel-Hamas war at universities across US dug in Saturday and vowed to keep their demonstrations going, some universities shut down encampments after reports of antisemitic activity among the protesters.
With the death toll mounting in the war in Gaza, protesters nationwide are demanding that schools cut financial ties to Israel and divest from companies they say are enabling the conflict. Some Jewish students say the protests have veered into antisemitism and made them afraid to set foot on campus.
Early Saturday, police in riot gear cleared an encampment on the campus of Northeastern University in Boston while several dozen students shouted and booed at them from a distance, but the scene was otherwise not confrontational.
The school said in a statement that the demonstration, which began two days ago, had become “infiltrated by professional organizers” with no affiliation to the school and protesters had used antisemitic slurs.
“We cannot tolerate this kind of hate on our campus,” the statement posted on the social media platform X said.
The University of Pennsylvania took similar action Friday when interim President J. Larry Jameson called for an encampment of protesters on the west Philadelphia campus to be disbanded, saying it violates the university’s facilities policies.
The “harassing and intimidating comments and actions” by some protesters violate the school’s open expression guidelines as well as state and federal law, Jameson said, and vandalism of a statue with antisemitic graffiti was “especially reprehensible and will be investigated as a hate crime.”
“I am deeply saddened and troubled that our many efforts to respectfully engage in discourse, support open expression, and create a community that is free of hate and inclusive for everyone have been ignored by those who choose to disrupt and intimidate,” he said.
At Columbia University, where protesters have inspired pro-Palestinian demonstrations across the country, negotiations continued with those at the student encampment.
The university’s senate passed a resolution Friday that created a task force to examine the administration’s leadership, which last week called in police in an attempt to clear the protest, resulting in scuffles and more than 100 arrests.
Though the university has repeatedly set and then pushed back deadlines for the removal of the encampment, the school sent an email to students Friday night saying that bringing back police “at this time” would be counterproductive.
Decisions to call in law enforcement, leading to hundreds of arrests nationwide, have prompted school faculty members at universities in California, Georgia and Texas to initiate or pass votes of no confidence in their leadership. They are largely symbolic rebukes, without the power to remove their presidents.
But the tensions pile pressure on school officials, who are already scrambling to resolve the protests as May graduation ceremonies near.
California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, gave protesters who have barricaded themselves inside a building since Monday until 5 p.m. Friday to leave and “not be immediately arrested.” The deadline came and went. Only some of the protesters left, others doubled down. After protesters rebuffed police earlier in the week, the campus was closed for the rest of the semester.
In Colorado, police swept through an encampment Friday at Denver’s Auraria Campus, which hosts three universities and colleges, arresting about 40 protesters on trespassing charges.
Students representing the Columbia encampment said Friday that they reached an impasse with administrators and intend to continue their protest. After meetings Thursday and Friday, student negotiators said the university had not met their primary demand for divestment.
In the letter sent to Columbia students Friday night, the university’s leadership said “we support the conversations that are ongoing with student leaders of the encampment.”
Columbia’s president, Minouche Shafik, faced significant criticism from faculty Friday, but retained the support of trustees.
A report by the university senate’s executive committee, which represents faculty, found Shafik and her administration took “many actions and decisions that have harmed Columbia University.” Those included calling in police and allowing students to be arrested without consulting faculty, misrepresenting and suspending student protest groups and hiring private investigators.
Also Friday, Columbia student protester Khymani James walked back comments made in an online video in January that recently received new attention. James said in the video that “Zionists don’t deserve to live” and people should be grateful James wasn’t killing them.
“What I said was wrong,” James said in a statement. “Every member of our community deserves to feel safe without qualification.”
James, who served as a spokesperson for the pro-Palestinian encampment as a member of Columbia University Apartheid Divest, was banned from campus Friday, according to a Columbia spokesperson.
Protest organizers said James’ comments didn’t reflect their values. They declined to describe James’ level of involvement with the demonstration.
In France, students at the Paris Institute of Political Studies, which counts President Emmanuel Macron among its many famous alumni, students blocked access to a campus building and classes went online as the wave of protests reached overseas.
Police clashed with protesters Thursday at Indiana University, Bloomington, where 34 were arrested; Ohio State University, where about 36 were arrested; and at the University of Connecticut, where one person was arrested.
The University of Southern California canceled its May 10 graduation ceremony Thursday, a day after more than 90 protesters were arrested on campus. The university said it will still host dozens of commencement events, including all the traditional individual school ceremonies.
Universities where faculty members have initiated or passed votes of no confidence in their presidents include Cal Poly Humboldt, University of Texas at Austin and Emory University.


Russia says it struck Ukrainian energy plants in response to Kyiv targeting its own energy sector

Updated 27 April 2024
Follow

Russia says it struck Ukrainian energy plants in response to Kyiv targeting its own energy sector

  • The strikes were “in response to attempts by the Kyiv regime to damage Russian energy and industrial facilities“
  • Ukraine has systematically targeted Russian oil refineries and other facilities in drone attacks in recent weeks

MOSCOW: The Russian Defense Ministry said on Saturday that its forces had carried out 35 strikes in the last week against Ukrainian energy facilities, defense factories, railway infrastructure, air defenses, and ammunition stocks.
It said in a statement that the strikes, which spanned April 20-27, were “in response to attempts by the Kyiv regime to damage Russian energy and industrial facilities.”
Ukraine has systematically targeted Russian oil refineries and other facilities in drone attacks in recent weeks, ignoring US requests not to do so.
Ukrainian officials said Russian missiles had pounded power facilities in central and western Ukraine on Saturday, increasing pressure on the ailing energy system as the country faces a shortage of air defenses despite a breakthrough in US military aid.
The Russian Defense Ministry said its campaign of strikes had been conducted using sea- and air-launched long-range precision weapons, including Kinzhal hypersonic missiles and drones.
It said it had also targeted and hit Ukrainian troop formations as well as what it described as foreign mercenaries.


Philippine capital’s financial center to become halal hub

Updated 27 April 2024
Follow

Philippine capital’s financial center to become halal hub

  • Makati Halal Hub to act as a platform for manufacturers, traders and consumers
  • Philippines’ central business district is perceived as trendsetter for other regions

MANILA: Philippine businesses in Makati City are joining hands with the Department of Trade and Industry to make the country’s financial center a halal hub, the head of the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry’s Makati branch said on Saturday.

Makati City in Metro Manila is often referred to as the Philippines’ central business district. It has the highest concentration of banks and multinational and local corporations in the country. Foreign embassies are also based there.

The predominantly Catholic Philippines — where Muslims constitute about 10 percent of the nearly 120 million population — plans to raise 230 billion pesos ($4 billion) in investments and generate around 120,000 jobs by expanding its domestic halal industry by 2028.

The DTI signed on Friday a memorandum of understanding with PCCI Makati to join the government’s efforts to tap into the global halal market, which is estimated to be worth more than $7 trillion.

“To be able to implement its policies more effectively — such as the promotion and development of the country’s halal industry — they (the government) have to collaborate or strike a partnership with the business community or the businessmen who will be responsible in making this a reality,” PCCI Makati President Toots Cortez told Arab News.

“We can be the catalyst. We will begin by creating awareness, especially among the MSMEs (micro, small and midsize enterprises) because, according to the records of DTI, 99.5 percent of business in the Philippines are composed of SMEs.”

The agreement on establishing the Makati Halal Hub will position the city as a “central point for innovation and business in the halal sector, spanning a variety of industries including food production, financial services, and more,” the DTI said in a statement, as it expects the initiative to “provide substantial opportunities for Filipino entrepreneurs and international investors alike, fostering a robust economic ecosystem.”

According to the vision, the hub will act as a platform facilitating connections between manufacturers, traders, buyers, distributors and consumers in the halal sector.

“If we can group together and promote halal, I think that will be the best approach … You don’t need a big budget,” Cortez said.

“There are many Muslim embassies in Makati City, many restaurants and major establishments … Many tourists come to Makati, so if we can convince the establishments in Makati to be accredited as halal, that’s a good beginning from our side as a catalyst.”

He believes that the industry’s promotion in the city will make an impact as Makati is widely perceived as a trendsetter for other Philippine regions.

“The others, they follow the lead,” Cortez said. “They follow the lead on what’s happening in Makati City.”