Pakistan's first women-team builds Formula car to race in international student competition

1 / 4
Pakistan's first all-female team gathers in a room at National University of Science and Technology (NUST) in Islamabad to brainstorm design and manufacturing the Formula car. (Photo courtesy: Facebook page of Auj - Formula Student)
2 / 4
Two team members use a machine lathe to design parts for the Formula car which is going to take part in International Student Formula competition in England from July 11-15. (Photo courtesy: Facebook page of Auj - Formula Student)
3 / 4
Two team members use a machine lathe to design parts for the Formula car which is going to take part in International Student Formula competition in England from July 11-15. (Photo courtesy: Facebook page of Auj - Formula Student)
4 / 4
The team unveiled the Formula One car in Cafe Garage, in NUST. The car has been manufactured in five months using all local parts and completed in record time. (Photo courtesy: Facebook page of Auj - Formula Student)
Updated 03 July 2018
Follow

Pakistan's first women-team builds Formula car to race in international student competition

  • Pakistani women are challenging stereotypes and excelling in all fields of life, say women rights activists
  • The students not only designed the prototype car, but built it from scratch using all local parts, including the engine, so that production costs were kept down to $4,929

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s first all-girl team from National University of Science and Technology (NUST) has developed a Formula car and are all set to represent the country in the International Formula Student competition in England this month.

“It was a challenging job, but we completed our Formula car in just five months,” Harim Akhtar, one of the 13 who designed and built the car, told Arab News.
She said they submitted their plans to the Formula Student competition in December last year for approval . “We were among the lucky applicants to get our case approved,” she said.
Akhtar said they not only designed the car, but built it from scratch using local parts, including the engine, for the prototype, enabling them to keep costs down to $4,929.
“We made some of its parts ourselves in the university workshop,” she said, “using lathe machines and welding some parts. It was a challenge, but we did it.”
One of the hardest bits was persuading their parents to allow them to stay at the university garage and workshop until late at night. “Our parents were not used to allowing us stay out late, and sometimes it was difficult to convince them,” she said.
Akhtar said when they first visited auto spare parts dealers in a Rawalpindi market some were shocked at first. “They were not used to dealing with female customers. Some even advised us to stay at home as this job was only meant for boys,” she said.
Formula Student —Europe’s most established educational engineering competition — is backed by high profile engineers and global industries. It aims to develop innovative and enterprising young engineers from around the world and encourage more people to start a career in engineering.
Each year hundreds of competitors take on the challenge of producing a prototype single-seat racing car for sprint racing or autocross. The finished vehicle is presented to a manufacturing firm for technical evaluation.
The NUST team’s car can go from 0-100 kilometers per hour in just 4.5 seconds and has 90 horsepower engine.
The team will compete against 30 other teams from around the world.
Farzana Bari, a human rights activist and former head of the gender studies department at Islamabad’s Quaid-i-Azam University, said manufacturing the car by an all-female team demonstrated female empowerment in the society.
“In our urban centers opportunities for women are expanding and it is encouraging to see they are excelling in every field of life,” she told Arab News.
“The NUST team is an inspiration to other women too,” she said. “This shows women are challenging stereotypes in all fields of life.”
The competition will take place on July 11-15 at Silverstone, the British home of motor racing in Northamptonshire, England.
Talking about the team’s future plans, Harim Akhtar said that they would produce a formula car each year to improve its design and manufacture. “We hope to learn a lot of new technical skills from the competition and will try to achieve perfection in our next model,” she said.


Review: Netflix’s ‘The New Yorker at 100’

Updated 14 December 2025
Follow

Review: Netflix’s ‘The New Yorker at 100’

  • Directed by Marshall Curry, the documentary opened the doors to the publication’s meticulous world, offering viewers a rare look inside the issues within the magazine’s issues

Out this month, Netflix’s “The New Yorker at 100” documentary marks the centennial of the weekly that has brought forth arguably some of the most compelling long-form journalism in my lifetime.

As a ferocious reader with an insatiable appetite for print, I vividly recall picking-up a copy of The New Yorker in Saudi Arabia after school as a teen, determined to read it cover-to-cover — only to find myself mentally, intellectually and physically exhausted after deciphering a single lyrical and Herculean-sized long-form piece.

Reading The New Yorker still makes one both feel smarter — and perhaps not smart enough — at the very same time. Just like the documentary.

Much like Vogue’s 2009 documentary, “The September Issue,” which followed (now retired) editor-in-chief Anna Wintour as she prepared for the September 2007 issue; this documentary largely centered on the making of the Feb. 17 & 24, 2025 multi-cover edition.

A quintessentially New York staple that readers either love or loathe — or both — the magazine has long been seen as a highbrow publication for the “elite.”

But The New Yorker is in on the joke. It never did take itself too seriously.

Directed by Marshall Curry, the documentary opened the doors to the publication’s meticulous world, offering viewers a rare look inside the issues within the magazine’s issues.

Narrated by actress Julianne Moore, it included sit-down interviews with famous figures, largely offering gushing testimonials.

It, of course, included many cameos from pop culture references such as from “Seinfeld,” “The Good Place” and others.

It also mentioned New Yorker’s famed late writers Anthony Bourdain and Truman Capote, and Ronan Farrow.

As a journalist myself, I enjoyed the behind-the-scenes peeks into staff meetings and editing discussions, including the line-by-line fact-checking process.

While lovingly headquartered in New York — and now based at One World Trade Center after decades in the heart of Times Square — the magazine has long published dispatches from elsewhere in the country and around the world.

I wish there had been more airtime dedicated to Jeanette “Jane” Cole Grant, who co-founded the magazine with her husband-at-the-time, Harold Ross, during the Roaring Twenties.

Ironically, neither founder hailed from New York — Grant arrived from Missouri at 16 to pursue singing before becoming a journalist on staff at The New York Times — and Ross came from a Colorado mining town.

Perhaps more bizarrely, Ross, who served as the first editor-in-chief of The New Yorker — known today for its intricate reporting and 11 Pulitzer Prizes — had dropped out of school at 13. He served as lead editor for 26 years until his death, guided by instinct and surrounded by talented writers he hired.

As the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and the magazine’s fifth editor-in-chief, David Remnick has held the role since 1998. “It is a place that publishes a 15,000-word profile of a musician one week, a 9,000-word account from Southern Lebanon, with gag cartoons interspersed in them,” he said in one scene.

It also offered a glimpse of the leadership of his predecessor, the vivacious and provocative Tina Brown, who served as editor-in-chief for six years starting in 1992.

No woman has held the top editor position before or since her tenure.

Some of the most compelling moments in the documentary, for me, showed journalists scribbling in reporter notebooks in darkened movie theaters, rocking-out in dingy punk shows, and reporting from political rallies while life unfolded around them.

These journalists were not sitting in diners, merely chasing the money or seated in corner offices; they were on the ground, focused on accuracy and texture, intent on portraying what it meant to be a New Yorker who cared about the world, both beyond the city’s borders and within them.

While Arab bylines remain limited, the insights from current marginalized writers and editors showed how the magazine has been trying to diversify and include more contributors of color. They are still working on it.

A century in, this documentary feels like an issue of The New Yorker — except perhaps easier to complete.