British PM arrives in India with largest-ever trade mission

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks with business leaders at the Taj Mahal Palace in Mumbai, India, Oct. 8, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 08 October 2025
Follow

British PM arrives in India with largest-ever trade mission

  • Starmer’s first official visit to India follows signing of multibillion-dollar trade pact
  • PM vows to expedite implementation of the deal that is UK’s biggest since Brexit

NEW DELHI: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer arrived in Mumbai on Wednesday leading the UK’s largest-ever trade mission to India.

Starmer is accompanied by a 125-member delegation including business executives and representatives of universities and cultural institutions.

The trip, which follows the signing of a multibillion-dollar free trade agreement in July, is the British premier’s first official visit to India since taking office last year.

“This is the biggest trade mission that the United Kingdom has ever sent into India,” he told a business gathering upon arrival in the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel in Mumbai.

“That FTA is really important for us. It’s the biggest deal that we’ve struck since we left the EU.”

The deal was signed during Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to London in late July and is yet to be ratified by both governments in a process that usually takes about 12 months.

“I’ve asked the team to implement it as quickly as humanly possible, so that it’s in place,” Starmer said. “I think the opportunities are already opening up, the contact has already increased, trade with India went up hugely.”

As he is scheduled to meet Modi on Thursday, it is expected that both may push for the ratification to be expedited in the face of India’s dealing with 50 percent US tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump’s administration, and the UK’s foreign and trade policies affected by Brexit — the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, which took effect in 2021. 

“I think this is important for both in India and the UK, and not only in the context of operationalizing the FTA and to keep the momentum going in the relationship, but also because this is a moment where the American policies have created an incentive to deepen the economic engagement,” Harsh V. Pant, vice president at Delhi-based think tank Observer Research Foundation, told Arab News.

“In that context, we can see an early coming into effect on the FTA and those issues that need to be resolved, perhaps will be resolved much faster than previously anticipated.”

Under the new pact, about 99 percent of Indian goods will get duty-free access to the UK market.

It will also halve import duties on UK-produced whiskey and gin from 150 percent, followed by a further decrease to 40 percent in a decade. Tariffs on automobiles will be reduced from 100 percent to 10 percent.

The FTA has been widely estimated to increase bilateral trade by 60 percent. Currently, it stands at about $54 billion, according to UK Department for Business and Trade data, with UK exports to India estimated at $21.7 billion and imports at $32.4 billion.


Fossil fuel lobbyists out in force at Amazon climate talks: NGOs

Updated 57 min 8 sec ago
Follow

Fossil fuel lobbyists out in force at Amazon climate talks: NGOs

BELEM: Lobbyists tied to the fossil fuel industry have turned up in strength at the UN climate talks in the Brazilian Amazon, an NGO coalition said Friday, warning that their presence undermines the process.
A total of 1,602 delegates with links to the oil, gas and coal sectors have headed to Belem, equivalent to around one in 25 participants, according to Kick Big Polluters Out (KBPO), which analyzed the list of attendees.
By comparison, hosts Brazil have sent 3,805 delegates.
The list compiled by KBPO includes representatives of energy giants ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell and TotalEnergies, as well as state-owned oil firms from Africa, Brazil, China and the Gulf.
But it also includes personnel from a broad range of companies such as German automaker Volkswagen or Danish shipping giant Maersk, or representatives of trade associations and other groups.
The Venice Sustainability Foundation is on the list because its members include Italian oil firm Eni.
KBPO also counted Danish wind energy giant Orsted, as it still has a gas trading business, and French energy firm EDF — most of its power comes from nuclear plants but it still uses some fossil fuels.
The list includes state-owned Emirati renewable firm Masdar.
One of the analysts, Patrick Galey, head of fossil fuel investigations at Global Witness, told AFP that some of the names might appear “surprising” at first sight, but KBPO analyzes data and open source material to identify those linked to fossil fuels.
Any renewable company that is a subsidiary of a fossil fuel firm made the list, for instance, because they are “at the beck and call” of their parent group, Galey said.
KBPO said it considers a fossil fuel lobbyist any delegate who “represents an organization or is a member of a delegation that can be reasonably assumed to have the objective of influencing” policy or legislation in the interests of the oil, gas and coal industry.
KBPO started analyzing official lists of COP participants in 2021.
COP28 in oil-rich Dubai in 2023 had a record number of participants — over 80,000 — but also the most fossil fuel lobbyists ever counted by KBPO at 2,456, or three percent of the total.
In Belem, 3.8 percent of attendees are tied to fossil fuel interests, the largest share ever documented by KBPO.
The UN began publishing a more comprehensive list of participants at COP28, making historical comparisons tricky.
“It’s common sense that you cannot solve a problem by giving power to those who caused it,” said Kick Big Polluters Out member Jax Bonbon from IBON International in the Philippines, which was recently struck by a devastating typhoon.
“Yet three decades and 30 COPs later, more than 1,500 fossil fuel lobbyists are roaming the climate talks as if they belong here,” Bonbon said in a statement.
The numbers could be higher.
According to Transparency International, 54 percent of participants in national delegations either withheld their affiliation or selected a vague category such as “guest” or “other.”