BBC’s Frank Gardner pulls out of ‘one-sided’ Al Jazeera debate

1 / 2
Protesters calling for the closure of ‘terror-supporting' Qatari network Al Jazeera gather on Monday outside the Frontline Club in London, where a panel discussion on Al Jazeera’s future was held. (Arab News photo)
2 / 2
Protesters calling for the closure of ‘terror-supporting' Qatari network Al Jazeera gather on Monday outside the Frontline Club in London, where a panel discussion on Al Jazeera’s future was held. (Arab News photo)
Updated 19 July 2017
Follow

BBC’s Frank Gardner pulls out of ‘one-sided’ Al Jazeera debate

LONDON: BBC journalist Frank Gardner pulled out of a debate over the future of Al Jazeera held Monday, which media commentators had slammed for being one-sided and which drew a crowd of protesters.
 
The correspondent was due to chair a panel discussion at the London-based Frontline Club but pulled out due to concerns raised by the BBC.
 
Commentators also cast doubt over the balance of the panel debate, which was entitled "The Al Jazeera Case."
 
Arab News has exclusively learned from confirmed sources within the BBC that Gardner declined to moderate the panel as it was deemed "a propaganda stunt by Qatar and Al-Jazeera with no attempt at balance on the panel."
 
In an email to Arab News, the BBC source criticized the organizers for failing "to invite anyone from the UAE, Saudi, Bahrain or Egypt onto the panel in time."
 
Panel members included Wadah Khanfar, the ex-director general of Al Jazeera Media Network, along with Giles Trendle, managing director of Al Jazeera English. It also included David Hearst, editor in chief of Middle East Eye, a website widely believed to be funded by Qatar. Hearst denies this, although on Monday he sidestepped a question about exactly who funds the website.
 
A BBC spokeswoman, when asked by Arab News to comment on the record, only explained Gardner's pulling out by saying: “Unfortunately we are not always able to take part in events we are invited to.”
 
Laura Gane of the Frontline Club told Arab News that, “understandably ... the BBC was concerned about him talking about another network."
 
Yet Gane also responded to questions raised about the one-sided nature of the panel discussion.
 
“We completely accept the fact that … there was an issue of neutrality,” she said.
 
“We knew we had an audience that would really challenge people.”
 
The panel also included Marc Jones of the Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies at the Exeter University, whose work has focused on “political repression in Bahrain,” according to the Frontline Club website.
 
Safa Al-Ahmad, an Saudi Arabian journalist and filmmaker, took Gardner’s place as moderator of the panel — and did challenge some of the speakers, with some audience members also raising strong objections about Al Jazeera’s output.
 
Yet academics and experts slammed the choice of panelists in the debate over the future of Al Jazeera, which has been caught up in the bitter diplomatic dispute in the Gulf over Qatar’s alleged support of extremist groups.
 
Fawaz Gerges, professor of international relations at the London School of Economics, said that such a debate needed to be more balanced.
 
“This is a serious family dispute. You can’t just have one member of the family airing their grievances,” he told Arab News. “You need both sides.”
 
Gerges said that Qatar was seeking to change the narrative about Al Jazeera to focus on freedom of speech and media rights. “This is not just about Al Jazeera - they are just one element in the equation.”
 
Middle East politics and business expert Michael Barron, director of Michael Barron Consulting, said however that it was valid for the TV network to present its case.
 
“Al Jazeera is part of the dispute between Qatar and its neighbors, with both sides strongly pressing their point of view. This panel appears to be an attempt to put forward the Al-Jazeera case which they are entitled to do. There will undoubtedly be occasions when the counter view is put forward such as the UAE foreign minister speaking in London this morning,” he told Arab News.
 
Former and current Al Jazeera executives Wadah Khanfar and Giles Trendle defended Al Jazeera’s record at Monday night’s event.
 
“We believe our journalism is balanced and professional,” Trendle said.
 
Trendle claimed that Al Jazeera retained “editorial independence” from the Qatari government, and said categorically that the network will not be shut down.
 
Wadah Khanfar, the former director general of Al Jazeera, said that Al Jazeera had broken “taboos” by putting forward both sides of the story, and was not a “tool of the state.”
 
One audience member, a former employee of Al Jazeera, vehemently disagreed with this view.
 
“When I joined in 2009, this was the most exciting news channel on the planet, producing the best international news and current affairs we had ever seen. But Qatar ruined it,” she said.
 
The former staffer said she noticed a “creeping executive interference” at the English-language channel, and said she resigned on principle.
 
“Al Jazeera Arabic was used as a political tool by the Qatari government, not directly, but indirectly and all over the place. The deal was that you left Al Jazeera English alone, but in the end you didn’t.
 
“Why did Al Jazeera English allow pressure from the Muslim Brotherhood, the agenda in Qatar, to infect and ruin a beautifully neutral channel and turn it into a propaganda channel?”
 
Wadah Khanfar, sitting on stage, laughed at such accusations; the former Al Jazeera employee shot back saying, “don’t laugh Wadah — it’s really serious.”
 
Dozens of protesters outside the venue held up banners and chanted “close down Al Jazeera!”
 
Political activist Sohaib Amr, one of those assembled outside the venue, cited several examples of Al Jazeera allegedly supporting terrorism.
 
“If you go to the terrorist and just give promotion to them… it will make propaganda for them,” he told Arab News.
 
“There is a difference between freedom of speech and promoting terrorism.”

TikTok CEO to fight US ban law

Updated 24 April 2024
Follow

TikTok CEO to fight US ban law

WASHINGTON: TikTok’s chief executive said on Wednesday that the company expects to win a legal challenge to block legislation signed into law by US President Joe Biden that he said would ban the popular short video app used by 170 million Americans.

“Rest assured — we aren’t going anywhere,” CEO Shou Zi Chew said in a video posted moments after Biden signed the bill that gives China-based ByteDance 270 days to divest TikTok’s US assets or face a ban. “The facts and the Constitution are on our side and we expect to prevail again.”

Biden’s signing sets a Jan. 19 deadline for a sale — one day before his term is set to expire — but he could extend the deadline by three months if he determines ByteDance is making progress. Biden is seeking a second term against former President Donald Trump.

In 2020, Trump was blocked by the courts in his bid to ban TikTok and Chinese-owned WeChat, a unit of Tencent, in the United States.

Chew added: “Make no mistake — this is a ban on TikTok.” He emphasized that TikTok would continue to operate as the company challenges the restrictions.

Driven by widespread worries among US lawmakers that China could access Americans’ data or surveil them with the app, the bill was overwhelmingly passed late on Tuesday by the US Senate. The US House of Representatives approved it on Saturday.

The four-year battle over TikTok is a significant front in a war over the internet and technology between Washington and Beijing. Last week, Apple said China had ordered it to remove Meta Platforms’ WhatsApp and Threads from its App Store in China over Chinese national security concerns.

TikTok is set to challenge the bill on First Amendment grounds and TikTok users are also expected to again take legal action. A US judge in Montana in November blocked a state ban on TikTok, citing free-speech grounds.

The American Civil Liberties Union said banning or requiring divestiture of TikTok would “set an alarming global precedent for excessive government control over social media platforms.”

However, the new legislation is likely to give the Biden administration a stronger legal footing to ban TikTok if ByteDance fails to divest the app, experts say.

If ByteDance failed to divest TikTok, app stores operated by Apple, Alphabet’s Google and others could not legally offer TikTok or provide web hosting services to ByteDance-controlled applications or TikTok’s website.

The bill would also give the White House new tools to ban or force the sale of other foreign-owned apps it deems to be security threats.

Democratic Senator Ron Wyden said he was concerned the bill “provides broad authority that could be abused by a future administration to violate Americans’ First Amendment rights.”

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said on Monday that President Joe Biden was “pushing” for a ban on TikTok and would be the one responsible if a ban were imposed, urging voters to take notice.

Biden’s re-election campaign plans to continue using TikTok, a campaign official said on Wednesday. Trump’s campaign has not joined TikTok.

Biden signed legislation in late 2022 that barred US government employees from using TikTok on government phones.


Advertising network MCN launches influencer practice in Mideast

Updated 24 April 2024
Follow

Advertising network MCN launches influencer practice in Mideast

DUBAI: Regional advertising group Middle East Communications Network has launched a dedicated influencer practice in the Middle East, North Africa and Turkiye to help clients across the group’s agencies, including FP7McCann, MullenLowe, UM, and Weber Shandwick.

Rami Gholmieh has been appointed to lead the practice as the regional director of influencer marketing, while Razan Zahra will serve as director of influencer relations.

“At the heart of our influence practice lies a commitment to two fundamental principles: effectiveness and efficiency,” Gholmieh told Arab News.

“The challenge lies in creating balance between leveraging channels to encourage content sharing and investing into paid promotions. Ultimately it requires a nuanced approach, tailored to the specific objectives and audience dynamics of respective brands.”

The practice takes a “de-siloed” approach to help agency brands across the group deliver influencer marketing campaigns, according to MCN.

L: Rami Gholmieh, regional director of influencer marketing. R: Razan Zahra, director of influencer relations.
L: Rami Gholmieh, regional director of influencer marketing. R: Razan Zahra, director of influencer relations.

The influencer marketing industry is rapidly growing, with 76.9 percent of marketers saying influencer marketing is a top priority, and 46.2 percent increasing budgets last year, according to a 2023 survey.

The growth and evolution of the industry is partly the reason why MCN chose to launch a dedicated practice now despite influencer marketing having been around for years.

With “the evolving dynamics of consumer engagement and brand interactions combined with new platforms and changing consumption patterns, a dedicated and fully integrated practice within the broader ecosystem is required to create tailor-made solutions for our clients,” the company said.  

As the digital and social media landscape becomes more complex, MCN’s influencer practice aims to help brands by “understanding the social voice, (acquiring) knowledge of real-time cultural insights, (and) possessing platform expertise, the ability to co-create, and journey awareness,” concluded Gholmieh.


Eurovision Song Contest host Sweden braces for anti-Israel protests

Updated 24 April 2024
Follow

Eurovision Song Contest host Sweden braces for anti-Israel protests

  • Event organizer European Broadcasting Union has resisted calls for Israel to be excluded due to its war in Gaza
  • Contest will take place in Malmo from 7-11 May and is expected to draw 100,000 visitors

MALMO: Sweden said it plans to host a dazzling Eurovision Song Contest, watched by 200 million people worldwide, but visitors face heightened security amid planned protests over Israel’s participation and a new geo-political backdrop since Sweden joined NATO.
The contest, the world’s biggest of its kind, takes place in Malmo from 7-11 May and is expected to draw 100,000 visitors to Sweden’s third-largest city which has a large Muslim population. Organizers plan a special tribute to Swedish pop group ABBA, who won Eurovision 50 years ago this year. The European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which organizes the contest, has resisted calls for Israel to be excluded due to its war in Gaza. Controversy over the conflict has already hit various cultural events across Europe. Much focus is expected to be on Israeli contestant Eden Golan and her song Hurricane, as multiple large pro-Palestinian protests are planned outside the venue in Malmo. Israel was permitted to compete after it agreed to modify the lyrics of its original song “October Rain” which the EBU said made reference to the Oct. 7 Hamas onslaught in Israel.
EBU brands Eurovision a non-political event and insists that the contest is between public service broadcasters, not governments.
Still, it banned Russian in 2022 from Eurovision after several European public broadcasters called for the country to be expelled following its invasion of Ukraine.
Sweden is hosting the annual competition for the seventh time, after Swedish singer Loreen won last year’s competition in Liverpool with her song “Tattoo.”
Ebba Adielsson, executive Eurovision producer from Swedish broadcaster SVT, promised “some smashing shows.” She ruled out an ABBA reunion but said the event would celebrate the group’s 1974 win with their song “Waterloo,” a victory that launched the band onto the international stage.
Swiss contestant Nemo is the favorite to win this year, according to bookmakers, followed by Croatia’s Baby Lasagna, Joost Klein of the Netherlands, and Italy’s Angelina Mango.

’HIGH THREAT-LEVEL’
Visitors from 89 countries expected in Malmo will have to pass through airport-like security checks when entering venues around the city.
“There’s a high threat level combined with a lot of people,” said Per-Erik Ebbestahl, Malmo’s security director.
Organizers face the risk of protests escalating into violence, heightened terror threats in the country, and increased tensions with Russia after Sweden’s NATO membership.
In central Malmo there are official posters for Eurovision but also protest banners replicating the same colorful design, with the word Eurovision replaced by ‘genocide’ and the words: “Israel out of Eurovision or Eurovision out of Malmo.”
Orwa Kadoura, a Palestinian living in Malmo and one of the organizers of the protests, said the Israeli delegation was “here to represent Israel and their government, which is committing acts of genocide right now.”
Israel rejects any accusation of genocide in Gaza during its war against Hamas.
Police say security will be tighter compared with when Sweden last hosted the event in 2016.
“The situation around the world is complex, and also the security for Sweden is different,” said Petra Stenkula, Malmo police chief. “We are ready for anything that can happen.”
Sweden joined NATO in March, two years after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine forced it to rethink its national security policy. Russia has threatened to take unspecified “political and military-technical counter-measures” in response.
Gang crime in Sweden’s biggest cities, including Malmo, has also been a problem for years, fueled by the drug trade.
Eurovision begins on May 7 with the first semifinal, followed by a second semifinal two days later and the final on Sat. May 11.


Sky News report reveals Israel’s involvement in mass grave in Gaza

Updated 24 April 2024
Follow

Sky News report reveals Israel’s involvement in mass grave in Gaza

  • Evidence suggests IDF bulldozed graves after taking control

LONDON: An investigation by Sky News suggests Israel is likely responsible for the mass grave discovered at a hospital in Gaza’s southern city of Khan Younis over the weekend.

Local authorities reported uncovering 283 bodies in the mass grave within the courtyard of Nasser Hospital after the Israel Defense Forces withdrew from the area on April 7.

Israel’s military dismissed claims of burying bodies there as “baseless” but confirmed that it had “examined” some bodies during a two-week operation at the hospital.

Analysis of satellite imagery and social media indicates that Palestinians buried their dead in mass graves during Israel’s siege of Nasser Hospital and that the IDF bulldozed these graves after taking control.

Prior to the Israeli army’s takeover of the hospital compound in its full-scale operation in February, staff had been forced to bury hundreds of bodies in makeshift graves near the hospital’s main building due to the impossibility of reaching nearby cemeteries.

The IDF began exhuming and examining bodies buried in the compound based on intelligence sources indicating the presence of bodies belonging to Israeli hostages.

The army said the examination “was carried out respectfully while maintaining the dignity of the deceased.

“Bodies examined, which did not belong to Israeli hostages, were returned to their place,” the IDF added.

However, Sky News’ Data and Forensic team discovered evidence indicating extensive damage to the sites caused by the army’s examination.

Footage uploaded a few days after the IDF left Nasser Hospital showed significant destruction at the southeastern corner of the complex, where some of the mass graves had been dug.

Another video revealed that bulldozer operations in the area caused an arm to be visible, partially buried in a mound of earth.

Satellite images confirmed that the damage occurred while Israeli forces were occupying the complex between Feb. 15 and 22.

The UN’s human rights chief expressed horror at the discovery and announced an investigation into claims that some of the bodies had their hands bound and were stripped of clothing.

Earlier last week, other mass graves were found at Al-Shifa, the largest medical facility in the coastal enclave.

The discovery led the Hamas-run government to accuse Israel of digging the graves “to hide its crimes.”

Since the conflict began, with retaliatory acts toward Hamas fighters killing and kidnapping 1,200 Israelis, Tel Aviv has launched a bloody, full-scale operation into the Gaza Strip that has resulted in the deaths of over 34,000 people, mostly women and children.


US police arrest Jadaliyya co-editor Sinan Antoon during pro-Gaza demonstration at New York University

Updated 23 April 2024
Follow

US police arrest Jadaliyya co-editor Sinan Antoon during pro-Gaza demonstration at New York University

  • Antoon was arrested along with other NYU faculty members while attempting to protect demonstrating students from the police
  • NYU students were calling for a ceasefire in Palestine's Gaza Strip

LONDON: US police officers on Monday arrested Sinan Antoon, the co-editor of Jadaliyya magazine, during a pro-Gaza demonstration at New York University in Manhattan.

The Arab Studies Institute publication announced in a post on X that Antoon, an associate professor at NYU, was arrested with other faculty members while trying to protect protesting students, who were reportedly calling for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip.

Antoon is an Iraqi-American poet, novelist, literary translator and academic. He was born and raised in Baghdad before moving to the US after the 1991 Gulf War. 

The Israeli onslaught on the besieged enclave has since Oct. 7 killed at least 34,000 Palestinians, displaced some 1.9 million, and injured more than 75,800 people, according to Gaza’s health authority.

Confirming Jadaliyya’s announcement, human rights attorney Noura Erakat wrote on X: “NYPD is arresting faculty on their campuses for protecting their students.

 “The academy is imbricated with the state and the military industry intent on war in blatant abrogation of its mission and any semblance of independence. What a gross betrayal.”

On Monday, officers from the New York Police Department moved in on NYU demonstrators after a deadline expired for people to clear an area of the campus, the Financial Times reported.

This came hours after New York’s Columbia University, where more than 100 people were arrested last week, announced it would switch to online classes in an attempt to defuse pro-Palestine protests.

The arrests at the NYU campus are part of a string of US police clampdowns on university students across the country protesting against the war on Gaza.

Local authorities claimed the clampdowns came amid scrutiny over “antisemitism” on US university campuses. 

US police also arrested at least 47 pro-Gaza demonstrators at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut.

The Columbia University clampdown, the first of its kind in three decades, triggered protests on other US campuses, including at Brown University, Berkeley, Princeton, Northwestern, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Emerson College in Boston.

In addition to calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, the protesting students also reportedly called for divestment of the university’s funds from companies linked to Israel.