For Pakistani Kashmiris, a sense of the grave inside their bunkers

Pakistani Kashmiri resident Chaudhry Hakam Deen sits with relatives in their bunker next to their house in Dhanna village, near the Line of Control (LoC) in Pakistan-administered Kashmir during a cross-border shelling by Indian troops. (AFP)
Updated 09 March 2019
0

For Pakistani Kashmiris, a sense of the grave inside their bunkers

  • The nuclear-armed neighbors regularly send shells and gunfire across the de facto border in Kashmir
  • Several civilians and soldiers died in the recent shelling on both sides

DHANNA, Pakistan: Chaudhry Hakam Deen has a bunker — a cold, damp hole dug in the ground — next to his home where he and his family have often taken refuge amid soaring tensions with India.
Spending the night inside, he said, “feels like sitting in a graveyard.”
The shelter dates from the Kargil conflict, a skirmish between India and Pakistan in disputed Kashmir in 1999.
Twenty years later, the nuclear-armed neighbors are again at loggerheads.
The latest crisis was sparked by a February 14 suicide bombing in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed 40 Indian paramilitaries, and was claimed by a Pakistan-based militant group.
In its aftermath, New Delhi and Islamabad launched tit-for-tat air strikes on each other’s territory, igniting fears of fresh conflict in South Asia.
The nuclear-armed neighbors regularly send shells and gunfire across the de facto border in Kashmir, known as the Line of Control, or LoC.
But as they stumbled to the brink of war in recent weeks, there was a surge in the already-heavy firing, and families such as Deen’s found the bunkers a miserable refuge.
Deen’s shelter, a stone’s throw from his house in the village of Dhanna some five kilometers (three miles) from the LoC, is as tiny as it is uncomfortable: just four feet (one meter) long and three feet wide.
Most adults cannot stand beneath its low ceiling, forced to sit or squat on cardboard or carpets, huddled around a mud stove whose smoke makes the inhabitants cough.
“When shelling starts we take our children... inside the bunker,” Deen says, looking down.
“They don’t have strength in their legs to even walk to the bunker, they don’t eat anything inside out of fear,” he adds.
For his older brother Chaudhry Maqbool, being in the bunker is worse than just being in a cemetery: it feels like sitting in a grave itself.
The white and blue walls of Deen’s home are studded with holes, some the size of a fist. One shell landed in his kitchen, while another broke an outside door.
He has piled sandbags at the entrance to his bunker. But in the event of an explosion, the packed earth walls and the roof of branches and plastic sheets may not be enough to protect those huddled inside.

Several civilians and soldiers died in the recent shelling on both sides of the LoC.
In Dhanna, the shelling was so intense that most of the 2,000 villagers fled. Only a handful stayed to protect their property.
An AFP correspondent saw a dozen houses, a health center and a service station that had been hit by the Indian strikes.
The women and children of Deen’s family were finally evacuated to the nearby town of Kotli, which was less exposed.
Tensions may have eased for now, but overall the shelling has increased dramatically since 2016, and locals fear worse is to come.
“This is a valley of fear. Life is at a standstill here,” said Sardar Javed, a local journalist.
“When people hear a sound they become nervous. They don’t know what will happen to them the next moment.”
Another resident, Ulfat Bibi, simply fortified her house, reinforcing the thickness of the walls and ceiling.
Still, the grandmother in her 50s says, each time the shelling begins it feels like the “world has come to an end.”
She and her family cannot flee, however, for fear of losing their two buffalo — their only assets.
At Bibi’s side, her 35-year-old daughter-in-law, Jameela Akhtar, is holding her two children, aged two and five.
Their eyes look into the distance, and they appear afraid.
They “are so terrified that they have become psychotic,” their mother says.


India’s Supreme Court chief justice denies sexually harassing assistant

Updated 20 April 2019
0

India’s Supreme Court chief justice denies sexually harassing assistant

  • “This is unbelievable,” Gogoi, India’s most powerful judge said
  • The allegations, dating from October, were carried in full by a number of major Indian online publications

MUMBAI: The chief justice of India’s Supreme Court, Ranjan Gogoi, on Saturday denied allegations that he made unwanted sexual advances toward a junior court assistant who worked in an office at his home and that she was subsequently victimized.
“This is unbelievable,” Gogoi, India’s most powerful judge, told a special hearing of the court he called on Saturday so that the allegations could be addressed. “I should not stoop low even in denying it.”
Gogoi said the events showed that India’s judiciary was under “serious threat” and was being destabilized by a larger conspiracy, without elaborating.
“There is some bigger force behind the woman,” he said.
The allegations, dating from October, were carried in full by a number of major Indian online publications on Saturday.
The 35-year-old woman, whose identity has not been publicly disclosed, wrote a letter to all 22 of the Supreme Court judges along with an affidavit detailing her allegations on Friday.
Those included a series of allegations that the woman and her family were victimized by a series of related actions by the authorities, including the termination of her employment, and the suspension of her husband and his brother, who worked in the Delhi police force.
She also says another brother of her husband’s had his Supreme Court job terminated and she also faced a “false and frivolous” bribery complaint, leading to her arrest and subsequent bail.
“Me and my family’s victimization is a consequence of my not agreeing to the sexual advances made by the Chief Justice of India, Justice Rangan Gogoi,” she said in the letter to the judges.
Justice Arun Mishra, who joined Gogoi on the bench for the special hearing, said the allegations were “wild and baseless.”
The court asked the media to show restraint in covering the case to avoid undermining the reputation and independence of the judiciary, though it decided not to issue a gag order.